1915.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:17:41 GMT 2002 1915.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=27.589 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.709 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.933 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.635 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 1915.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1915.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1915.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.709/27.361/39.635/7.366 ms 1915.ms:19.709 27.361 39.635 7.366 1915.loss:0 1930.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:32:42 GMT 2002 1930.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=40.276 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.921 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.933 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.930 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.930 msec 1930.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1930.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.921/33.998/40.276/4.985 ms 1930.ms:29.921 33.998 40.276 4.985 1930.loss:0 1945.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:47:42 GMT 2002 1945.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.630 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.949 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.952 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.956 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.953 msec 1945.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1945.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1945.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.949/22.288/29.952/3.886 ms 1945.ms:19.949 22.288 29.952 3.886 1945.loss:0 2000.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:02:42 GMT 2002 2000.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=63.664 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.946 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.935 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.942 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.946 msec 2000.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.935/40.686/63.664/12.330 ms 2000.ms:29.935 40.686 63.664 12.330 2000.loss:0 2015.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:17:43 GMT 2002 2015.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=39.207 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.958 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.955 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.920 msec 2015.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.920/27.796/39.207/7.254 ms 2015.ms:19.920 27.796 39.207 7.254 2015.loss:0 2030.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:32:42 GMT 2002 2030.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=16.866 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.955 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.963 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.957 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.945 msec 2030.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.866/23.337/29.955/5.517 ms 2030.ms:16.866 23.337 29.955 5.517 2030.loss:0 2045.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:47:42 GMT 2002 2045.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=29.020 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.874 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.575 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.716 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.813 msec 2045.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.575/27.599/39.813/7.524 ms 2045.ms:19.575 27.599 39.813 7.524 2045.loss:0 2100.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:02:42 GMT 2002 2100.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=37.936 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.941 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.939 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.939 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.936 msec 2100.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.941/29.538/37.936/5.712 ms 2100.ms:19.941 29.538 37.936 5.712 2100.loss:0 2115.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:17:41 GMT 2002 2115.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=17.815 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.947 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.928 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.935 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.935 msec 2115.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.815/25.512/29.947/5.460 ms 2115.ms:17.815 25.512 29.947 5.460 2115.loss:0 2130.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:32:41 GMT 2002 2130.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=24.310 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.946 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.953 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.947 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=389.944 msec 2130.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.946/94.820/389.944/147.571 ms 2130.ms:19.946 94.820 389.944 147.571 2130.loss:0 2145.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:47:41 GMT 2002 2145.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=22.039 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.949 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.942 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.951 msec 2145.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 22.039/28.364/29.951/3.170 ms 2145.ms:22.039 28.364 29.951 3.170 2145.loss:0 2200.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:02:41 GMT 2002 2200.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=41.457 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.944 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=49.953 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.948 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.949 msec 2200.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.944/30.250/49.953/12.902 ms 2200.ms:19.944 30.250 49.953 12.902 2200.loss:0 2215.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:17:41 GMT 2002 2215.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=43.142 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.951 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.953 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.949 msec 2215.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.943/34.587/43.142/5.774 ms 2215.ms:29.943 34.587 43.142 5.774 2215.loss:0 2230.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:32:41 GMT 2002 2230.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.964 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.956 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.951 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.892 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.960 msec 2230.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.892/22.344/29.951/3.886 ms 2230.ms:19.892 22.344 29.951 3.886 2230.loss:0 2245.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:47:41 GMT 2002 2245.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=43.137 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.963 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.958 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.954 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.958 msec 2245.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.954/24.594/43.137/9.271 ms 2245.ms:19.954 24.594 43.137 9.271 2245.loss:0 2300.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:02:49 GMT 2002 2300.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=19.733 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.941 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.927 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.946 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.929 msec 2300.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.733/23.895/29.946/4.935 ms 2300.ms:19.733 23.895 29.946 4.935 2300.loss:0 2315.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:18:01 GMT 2002 2315.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.893 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.935 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.933 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.927 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.929 msec 2315.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.927/22.323/29.929/3.880 ms 2315.ms:19.927 22.323 29.929 3.880 2315.loss:0 2330.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:32:43 GMT 2002 2330.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=27.238 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.928 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.934 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.919 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.934 msec 2330.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.934/27.390/39.919/7.413 ms 2330.ms:19.934 27.390 39.919 7.413 2330.loss:0 2345.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:47:56 GMT 2002 2345.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=24.480 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=23.446 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.940 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.935 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.936 msec 2345.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 2345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/23.547/29.936/3.683 ms 2345.ms:19.935 23.547 29.936 3.683 2345.loss:0 0000.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:02:42 GMT 2002 0000.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=37.523 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.671 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.953 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.946 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.938 msec 0000.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.938/35.406/39.953/4.541 ms 0000.ms:29.938 35.406 39.953 4.541 0000.loss:0 0015.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:17:41 GMT 2002 0015.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=22.680 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.948 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.952 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.937 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.935 msec 0015.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/22.490/29.937/3.873 ms 0015.ms:19.935 22.490 29.937 3.873 0015.loss:0 0030.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:32:42 GMT 2002 0030.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=41.552 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=99.955 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=49.958 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.953 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=49.953 msec 0030.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.953/54.274/99.955/23.989 ms 0030.ms:29.953 54.274 99.955 23.989 0030.loss:0 0045.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:47:42 GMT 2002 0045.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=16.985 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.951 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.951 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.945 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=14.781 msec 0045.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.781/18.322/19.951/2.115 ms 0045.ms:14.781 18.322 19.951 2.115 0045.loss:0 0100.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:02:41 GMT 2002 0100.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.257 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.941 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.946 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.906 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.923 msec 0100.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.906/22.194/29.923/3.901 ms 0100.ms:19.906 22.194 29.923 3.901 0100.loss:0 0115.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:17:41 GMT 2002 0115.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=28.513 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.946 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.961 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.965 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.948 msec 0115.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/23.666/29.946/4.567 ms 0115.loss:0 0115.ms:19.948 23.666 29.946 4.567 0130.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:32:41 GMT 2002 0130.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=33.181 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.965 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.958 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.957 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=59.957 msec 0130.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.957/40.603/59.957/10.431 ms 0130.ms:29.957 40.603 59.957 10.431 0130.loss:0 0145.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:47:42 GMT 2002 0145.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=22.346 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.927 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.928 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.933 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.913 msec 0145.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.913/22.409/29.927/3.876 ms 0145.ms:19.913 22.409 29.927 3.876 0145.loss:0 0200.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:02:42 GMT 2002 0200.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=24.350 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.950 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.936 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.949 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.947 msec 0200.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.936/22.826/29.949/3.951 ms 0200.ms:19.936 22.826 29.949 3.951 0200.loss:0 0215.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:17:42 GMT 2002 0215.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=48.194 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.936 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.959 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.905 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=59.947 msec 0215.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 39.905/45.588/59.947/7.861 ms 0215.ms:39.905 45.588 59.947 7.861 0215.loss:0 0230.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:32:41 GMT 2002 0230.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=43.701 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.950 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.948 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=69.953 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=69.950 msec 0230.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.950/46.700/69.953/20.428 ms 0230.ms:19.950 46.700 69.953 20.428 0230.loss:0 0245.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:47:42 GMT 2002 0245.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=27.622 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.951 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.963 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.945 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.933 msec 0245.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/33.482/39.963/8.286 ms 0245.ms:19.945 33.482 39.963 8.286 0245.loss:0 0300.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:02:42 GMT 2002 0300.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=31.994 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.958 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.957 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.956 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.954 msec 0300.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.956/34.363/39.957/4.631 ms 0300.ms:29.956 34.363 39.957 4.631 0300.loss:0 0315.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:17:42 GMT 2002 0315.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=31.157 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.948 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.952 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=49.955 msec 0315.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.943/36.191/49.955/7.834 ms 0315.ms:29.943 36.191 49.955 7.834 0315.loss:0 0330.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:32:44 GMT 2002 0330.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=19.350 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.925 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.921 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=49.919 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.925 msec 0330.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.350/33.808/49.919/10.355 ms 0330.ms:19.350 33.808 49.919 10.355 0330.loss:0 0345.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:47:42 GMT 2002 0345.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=33.028 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.939 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.934 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.939 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.904 msec 0345.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.934/34.548/39.939/4.535 ms 0345.ms:29.934 34.548 39.939 4.535 0345.loss:0 0400.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:02:42 GMT 2002 0400.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=34.435 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.911 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=49.914 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=69.924 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.615 msec 0400.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0400.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 34.435/46.759/69.924/12.623 ms 0400.loss:0 0400.ms:34.435 46.759 69.924 12.623 0415.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:17:43 GMT 2002 0415.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=31.084 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.855 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.877 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.927 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.945 msec 0415.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0415.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0415.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/28.137/31.084/4.126 ms 0415.ms:19.945 28.137 31.084 4.126 0415.loss:0 0430.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:32:42 GMT 2002 0430.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=26.138 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.917 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.933 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.933 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.929 msec 0430.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0430.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/25.170/29.929/4.493 ms 0430.ms:19.933 25.170 29.929 4.493 0430.loss:0 0445.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:47:41 GMT 2002 0445.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=23.914 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.944 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.941 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.935 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.948 msec 0445.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0445.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0445.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/24.736/29.948/4.495 ms 0445.ms:19.935 24.736 29.948 4.495 0445.loss:0 0500.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:02:42 GMT 2002 0500.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=26.410 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.941 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.521 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.925 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.942 msec 0500.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0500.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.925/25.147/29.941/4.433 ms 0500.loss:0 0500.ms:19.925 25.147 29.941 4.433 0515.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:17:42 GMT 2002 0515.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=34.574 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.938 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.929 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.938 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.938 msec 0515.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0515.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0515.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.929/32.863/39.938/3.970 ms 0515.ms:29.929 32.863 39.938 3.970 0515.loss:0 0530.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:32:41 GMT 2002 0530.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=36.894 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.954 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.961 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.942 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.947 msec 0530.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0530.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.942/31.339/36.894/2.783 ms 0530.ms:29.942 31.339 36.894 2.783 0530.loss:0 0545.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:47:42 GMT 2002 0545.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=13.072 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.953 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.958 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.954 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.961 msec 0545.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0545.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0545.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.072/18.579/19.961/2.757 ms 0545.ms:13.072 18.579 19.961 2.757 0545.loss:0 0600.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:02:41 GMT 2002 0600.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.534 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.949 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.892 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.938 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.960 msec 0600.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0600.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.892/20.254/21.534/0.658 ms 0600.ms:19.892 20.254 21.534 0.658 0600.loss:0 0615.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:17:41 GMT 2002 0615.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=19.454 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.936 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.947 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.931 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.936 msec 0615.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0615.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0615.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.454/19.840/19.947/0.263 ms 0615.ms:19.454 19.840 19.947 0.263 0615.loss:0 0630.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:32:41 GMT 2002 0630.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=20.368 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.937 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.872 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.947 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.937 msec 0630.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0630.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.872/20.012/20.368/0.200 ms 0630.ms:19.872 20.012 20.368 0.200 0630.loss:0 0645.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:47:42 GMT 2002 0645.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=24.183 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.949 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.942 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.940 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.945 msec 0645.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0645.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0645.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.940/20.791/24.183/1.705 ms 0645.ms:19.940 20.791 24.183 1.705 0645.loss:0 0700.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:02:41 GMT 2002 0700.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=20.903 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.940 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.946 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.938 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.945 msec 0700.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0700.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.938/20.134/20.903/0.404 ms 0700.ms:19.938 20.134 20.903 0.404 0700.loss:0 0715.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:17:42 GMT 2002 0715.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=22.926 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.946 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.949 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.936 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.953 msec 0715.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0715.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0715.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.936/20.542/22.926/1.192 ms 0715.ms:19.936 20.542 22.926 1.192 0715.loss:0 0730.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:32:43 GMT 2002 0730.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.018 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.960 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.952 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.949 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.955 msec 0730.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0730.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.955/26.166/29.960/4.654 ms 0730.ms:19.955 26.166 29.960 4.654 0730.loss:0 0745.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:47:41 GMT 2002 0745.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=23.676 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.957 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.950 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.945 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.956 msec 0745.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0745.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0745.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/24.696/29.957/4.509 ms 0745.ms:19.945 24.696 29.957 4.509 0745.loss:0 0800.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:02:41 GMT 2002 0800.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=33.103 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.960 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.947 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.957 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.961 msec 0800.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0800.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.961/28.585/33.103/4.485 ms 0800.ms:19.961 28.585 33.103 4.485 0800.loss:0 0815.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:17:42 GMT 2002 0815.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=23.164 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.964 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.952 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.570 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.955 msec 0815.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0815.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0815.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.570/22.521/29.964/3.942 ms 0815.ms:19.570 22.521 29.964 3.942 0815.loss:0 0830.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:32:41 GMT 2002 0830.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=22.018 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.953 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.958 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.956 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.965 msec 0830.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0830.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.956/22.370/29.953/3.874 ms 0830.ms:19.956 22.370 29.953 3.874 0830.loss:0 0845.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:47:41 GMT 2002 0845.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=18.062 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.956 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.940 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.939 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.956 msec 0845.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0845.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0845.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.062/21.570/29.939/4.250 ms 0845.ms:18.062 21.570 29.939 4.250 0845.loss:0 0900.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:02:42 GMT 2002 0900.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=23.048 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.952 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.942 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.942 msec 0900.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0900.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 23.048/28.565/29.952/2.762 ms 0900.ms:23.048 28.565 29.952 2.762 0900.loss:0 0915.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:17:41 GMT 2002 0915.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.166 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.952 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.929 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.944 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.950 msec 0915.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0915.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0915.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.929/20.188/21.166/0.497 ms 0915.ms:19.929 20.188 21.166 0.497 0915.loss:0 0930.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:32:41 GMT 2002 0930.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=22.870 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.951 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.957 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.947 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.952 msec 0930.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0930.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.951/22.535/29.947/3.876 ms 0930.ms:19.951 22.535 29.947 3.876 0930.loss:0 0945.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:47:41 GMT 2002 0945.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=28.988 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.951 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.952 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.958 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=89.950 msec 0945.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 0945.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0945.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.951/37.759/89.950/26.442 ms 0945.ms:19.951 37.759 89.950 26.442 0945.loss:0 1000.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:02:41 GMT 2002 1000.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=20.975 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.950 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.960 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.946 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.949 msec 1000.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.949/26.156/39.960/7.858 ms 1000.ms:19.949 26.156 39.960 7.858 1000.loss:0 1015.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:17:41 GMT 2002 1015.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=13.025 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.949 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.953 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.947 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.954 msec 1015.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.025/18.565/19.954/2.774 ms 1015.ms:13.025 18.565 19.954 2.774 1015.loss:0 1030.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:32:42 GMT 2002 1030.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=14.025 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.959 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.943 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.958 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.955 msec 1030.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.025/18.768/19.959/2.371 ms 1030.ms:14.025 18.768 19.959 2.371 1030.loss:0 1045.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:47:41 GMT 2002 1045.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=22.830 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.954 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.947 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.945 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.949 msec 1045.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/22.525/29.949/3.876 ms 1045.ms:19.945 22.525 29.949 3.876 1045.loss:0 1100.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:02:41 GMT 2002 1100.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=55.543 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=69.943 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.943 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.941 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.943 msec 1100.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.941/37.062/69.943/21.457 ms 1100.ms:19.941 37.062 69.943 21.457 1100.loss:0 1115.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:17:42 GMT 2002 1115.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=20.372 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.939 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.930 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.950 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.946 msec 1115.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.930/20.027/20.372/0.213 ms 1115.ms:19.930 20.027 20.372 0.213 1115.loss:0 1130.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:32:41 GMT 2002 1130.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=22.379 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.923 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.921 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.230 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.916 msec 1130.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.230/20.273/22.379/1.100 ms 1130.ms:19.230 20.273 22.379 1.100 1130.loss:0 1145.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:47:41 GMT 2002 1145.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=32.268 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.950 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.958 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.953 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.946 msec 1145.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.953/28.415/32.268/4.325 ms 1145.ms:19.953 28.415 32.268 4.325 1145.loss:0 1200.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:02:42 GMT 2002 1200.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=25.338 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.952 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.952 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.954 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.942 msec 1200.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.942/21.027/25.338/2.161 ms 1200.ms:19.942 21.027 25.338 2.161 1200.loss:0 1215.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:17:40 GMT 2002 1215.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=20.634 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.953 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.948 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.955 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.962 msec 1215.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/20.090/20.634/0.299 ms 1215.ms:19.948 20.090 20.634 0.299 1215.loss:0 1230.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:32:41 GMT 2002 1230.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=52.960 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=49.956 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=49.905 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.957 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=49.961 msec 1230.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 39.957/48.547/52.960/4.460 ms 1230.ms:39.957 48.547 52.960 4.460 1230.loss:0 1245.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:47:41 GMT 2002 1245.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=20.282 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.955 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.951 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.948 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.956 msec 1245.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/22.018/29.951/3.970 ms 1245.ms:19.948 22.018 29.951 3.970 1245.loss:0 1300.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:02:41 GMT 2002 1300.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=23.406 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.965 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.954 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.968 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.956 msec 1300.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.954/20.649/23.406/1.390 ms 1300.ms:19.954 20.649 23.406 1.390 1300.loss:0 1315.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:17:42 GMT 2002 1315.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.443 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.791 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.895 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=27.827 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.918 msec 1315.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.791/23.774/29.918/4.259 ms 1315.ms:19.791 23.774 29.918 4.259 1315.loss:0 1330.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:32:41 GMT 2002 1330.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=15.445 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.719 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.937 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.713 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.931 msec 1330.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.445/20.949/29.937/4.799 ms 1330.ms:15.445 20.949 29.937 4.799 1330.loss:0 1345.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:47:41 GMT 2002 1345.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=33.580 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.935 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.947 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.880 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 1345.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.880/28.657/39.935/7.822 ms 1345.ms:19.880 28.657 39.935 7.822 1345.loss:0 1400.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:02:42 GMT 2002 1400.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=23.694 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.944 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.961 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.944 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.942 msec 1400.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1400.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.944/22.697/29.942/3.901 ms 1400.ms:19.944 22.697 29.942 3.901 1400.loss:0 1415.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:17:41 GMT 2002 1415.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=21.993 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.941 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.910 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=19.944 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=19.943 msec 1415.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1415.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1415.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.943/26.346/39.910/7.718 ms 1415.ms:19.943 26.346 39.910 7.718 1415.loss:0 1430.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:32:42 GMT 2002 1430.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=20.485 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=19.950 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=19.948 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.945 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=49.951 msec 1430.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1430.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/30.055/49.951/12.567 ms 1430.ms:19.948 30.055 49.951 12.567 1430.loss:0 1445.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:47:42 GMT 2002 1445.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=36.025 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=59.946 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=89.948 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=109.959 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=59.951 msec 1445.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1445.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1445.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 36.025/71.165/109.959/25.864 ms 1445.ms:36.025 71.165 109.959 25.864 1445.loss:0 1500.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:02:42 GMT 2002 1500.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=102.657 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=89.962 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.950 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=69.966 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=49.960 msec 1500.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1500.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 39.950/70.499/102.657/23.530 ms 1500.ms:39.950 70.499 102.657 23.530 1500.loss:0 1515.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:17:41 GMT 2002 1515.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=33.189 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.962 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.950 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.961 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=119.964 msec 1515.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1515.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1515.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.950/50.605/119.964/34.871 ms 1515.ms:29.950 50.605 119.964 34.871 1515.loss:0 1530.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:32:43 GMT 2002 1530.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=40.663 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.943 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.950 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.944 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.941 msec 1530.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1530.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.941/36.088/40.663/5.026 ms 1530.ms:29.941 36.088 40.663 5.026 1530.loss:0 1545.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:47:41 GMT 2002 1545.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=34.847 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.945 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.928 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.944 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.942 msec 1545.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1545.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1545.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.928/30.921/34.847/1.966 ms 1545.ms:29.928 30.921 34.847 1.966 1545.loss:0 1600.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:02:42 GMT 2002 1600.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=79.003 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=69.953 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=49.945 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=49.943 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=49.950 msec 1600.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1600.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 49.943/59.758/79.003/12.358 ms 1600.ms:49.943 59.758 79.003 12.358 1600.loss:0 1615.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:17:41 GMT 2002 1615.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=31.272 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.939 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.937 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.933 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 1615.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1615.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1615.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.933/30.204/31.272/0.577 ms 1615.ms:29.933 30.204 31.272 0.577 1615.loss:0 1630.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:32:42 GMT 2002 1630.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=32.061 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.947 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.959 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.938 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.943 msec 1630.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1630.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.938/30.369/32.061/0.867 ms 1630.ms:29.938 30.369 32.061 0.867 1630.loss:0 1645.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:47:41 GMT 2002 1645.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=39.831 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.950 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.955 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.939 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.948 msec 1645.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1645.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1645.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.939/33.924/39.948/4.874 ms 1645.loss:0 1645.ms:29.939 33.924 39.948 4.874 1700.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:02:42 GMT 2002 1700.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=28.939 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.949 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.957 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.960 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.952 msec 1700.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1700.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 28.939/29.751/29.960/0.434 ms 1700.ms:28.939 29.751 29.960 0.434 1700.loss:0 1715.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:17:42 GMT 2002 1715.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=36.604 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.946 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.677 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.942 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.950 msec 1715.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1715.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1715.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 36.604/39.223/39.950/1.337 ms 1715.ms:36.604 39.223 39.950 1.337 1715.loss:0 1724.ping:+ date 1730.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:32:42 GMT 2002 1730.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=43.286 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.950 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.958 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.959 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=49.955 msec 1730.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1730.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.950/36.621/49.955/8.434 ms 1730.ms:29.950 36.621 49.955 8.434 1730.loss:0 1738.ping:+ date 1738.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:38:44 GMT 2002 1738.ping:+ qping cesium.clock.org 1738.ping:+ ping -c 5 cesium.clock.org 1738.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1738.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=43.867 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.966 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.967 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.965 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.969 msec 1738.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1738.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1738.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.965/32.746/43.867/5.564 ms 1738.ms:29.965 32.746 43.867 5.564 1738.loss:0 1745.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:45:44 GMT 2002 1745.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=27.719 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.941 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=69.915 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=59.835 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=29.914 msec 1745.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1745.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1745.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 27.719/45.464/69.915/16.684 ms 1745.ms:27.719 45.464 69.915 16.684 1745.loss:0 1800.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:00:50 GMT 2002 1800.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=35.258 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.936 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.925 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.927 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.931 msec 1800.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1800.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 35.258/38.995/39.936/1.877 ms 1800.ms:35.258 38.995 39.936 1.877 1800.loss:0 1815.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:15:44 GMT 2002 1815.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=28.786 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.939 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=29.942 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.938 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.945 msec 1815.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1815.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1815.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 28.786/31.710/39.945/4.141 ms 1815.ms:28.786 31.710 39.945 4.141 1815.loss:0 1830.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:30:45 GMT 2002 1830.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=45.525 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=39.949 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=39.947 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=39.936 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.945 msec 1830.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1830.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 39.936/41.060/45.525/2.239 ms 1830.ms:39.936 41.060 45.525 2.239 1830.loss:0 1845.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:45:46 GMT 2002 1845.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=53.448 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=69.820 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=59.926 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=59.917 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=59.881 msec 1845.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1845.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1845.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 53.448/60.598/69.820/5.250 ms 1845.ms:53.448 60.598 69.820 5.250 1845.loss:0 1900.ping:Fri Feb 22 19:00:47 GMT 2002 1900.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=32.659 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=29.475 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=46.546 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=29.912 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (216.240.40.205): icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=39.941 msec 1900.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 1900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1900.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.475/35.706/46.546/6.592 ms 1900.ms:29.475 35.706 46.546 6.592 1900.loss:0 11051100.ping:Wed Nov 5 11:00:17 PST 2008 11051100.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=36.6 ms 11051100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=29.7 ms 11051100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=29.5 ms 11051100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=30.7 ms 11051100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=30.1 ms 11051100.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11051100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.573/31.364/36.610/2.662 ms 11051100.ms:29.573 31.364 36.610 2.662 11051100.loss:0 11051130.ping:Wed Nov 5 11:30:21 PST 2008 11051130.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=339 ms 11051130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=367 ms 11051130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=343 ms 11051130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=343 ms 11051130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=340 ms 11051130.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 11051130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 339.127/346.818/367.050/10.253 ms 11051130.ms:339.127 346.818 367.050 10.253 11051130.loss:0 11051200.ping:Wed Nov 5 12:00:21 PST 2008 11051200.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=30.9 ms 11051200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=29.2 ms 11051200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=30.4 ms 11051200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=32.4 ms 11051200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=28.4 ms 11051200.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11051200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.483/30.301/32.442/1.394 ms 11051200.ms:28.483 30.301 32.442 1.394 11051200.loss:0 11051230.ping:Wed Nov 5 12:30:20 PST 2008 11051230.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=29.8 ms 11051230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=29.3 ms 11051230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=32.3 ms 11051230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=30.2 ms 11051230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=30.7 ms 11051230.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11051230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.389/30.508/32.387/1.048 ms 11051230.ms:29.389 30.508 32.387 1.048 11051230.loss:0 11051300.ping:Wed Nov 5 13:00:20 PST 2008 11051300.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=77.0 ms 11051300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=117 ms 11051300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=75.4 ms 11051300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=32.8 ms 11051300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=69.1 ms 11051300.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11051300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.881/74.447/117.751/26.977 ms 11051300.ms:32.881 74.447 117.751 26.977 11051300.loss:0 11051330.ping:Wed Nov 5 13:30:21 PST 2008 11051330.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=30.5 ms 11051330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=50.6 ms 11051330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=33.7 ms 11051330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=32.3 ms 11051330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=33.8 ms 11051330.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11051330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.582/36.243/50.656/7.306 ms 11051330.ms:30.582 36.243 50.656 7.306 11051330.loss:0 11051400.ping:Wed Nov 5 14:00:21 PST 2008 11051400.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=182 ms 11051400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=33.9 ms 11051400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=36.0 ms 11051400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=31.0 ms 11051400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=34.6 ms 11051400.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11051400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.098/63.724/182.852/59.586 ms 11051400.ms:31.098 63.724 182.852 59.586 11051400.loss:0 11051430.ping:Wed Nov 5 14:30:20 PST 2008 11051430.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=34.0 ms 11051430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=64.3 ms 11051430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=31.0 ms 11051430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=6 ttl=239 time=44.0 ms 11051430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=7 ttl=239 time=31.6 ms 11051430.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051430.ping:7 packets transmitted, 5 received, 28% packet loss, time 6001ms 11051430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.027/41.036/64.385/12.583 ms 11051430.ms:31.027 41.036 64.385 12.583 11051430.loss:28 11051500.ping:Wed Nov 5 15:00:20 PST 2008 11051500.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=32.8 ms 11051500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=31.6 ms 11051500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=32.6 ms 11051500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=43.3 ms 11051500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=32.4 ms 11051500.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11051500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.636/34.606/43.389/4.417 ms 11051500.ms:31.636 34.606 43.389 4.417 11051500.loss:0 11051530.ping:Wed Nov 5 15:30:21 PST 2008 11051530.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.1 ms 11051530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.5 ms 11051530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=23.2 ms 11051530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.8 ms 11051530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=20.6 ms 11051530.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11051530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.665/22.103/23.245/0.869 ms 11051530.ms:20.665 22.103 23.245 0.869 11051530.loss:0 11051600.ping:Wed Nov 5 16:00:21 PST 2008 11051600.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=27.1 ms 11051600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=30.6 ms 11051600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=43.9 ms 11051600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=33.7 ms 11051600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=37.1 ms 11051600.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11051600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.117/34.528/43.976/5.778 ms 11051600.ms:27.117 34.528 43.976 5.778 11051600.loss:0 11051630.ping:Wed Nov 5 16:30:20 PST 2008 11051630.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=41.0 ms 11051630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=41.7 ms 11051630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=39.3 ms 11051630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=351 ms 11051630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=28.8 ms 11051630.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11051630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.847/100.474/351.418/125.558 ms 11051630.ms:28.847 100.474 351.418 125.558 11051630.loss:0 11051700.ping:Wed Nov 5 17:00:21 PST 2008 11051700.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=25.6 ms 11051700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=34.6 ms 11051700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=30.6 ms 11051700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=26.3 ms 11051700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=36.1 ms 11051700.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11051700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.690/30.694/36.155/4.236 ms 11051700.ms:25.690 30.694 36.155 4.236 11051700.loss:0 11051730.ping:Wed Nov 5 17:30:20 PST 2008 11051730.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=29.6 ms 11051730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=30.3 ms 11051730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=29.8 ms 11051730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=44.1 ms 11051730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=81.4 ms 11051730.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11051730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.629/43.080/81.479/19.969 ms 11051730.ms:29.629 43.080 81.479 19.969 11051730.loss:0 11051800.ping:Wed Nov 5 18:00:20 PST 2008 11051800.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=29.4 ms 11051800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=31.2 ms 11051800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=30.0 ms 11051800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=30.3 ms 11051800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=53.7 ms 11051800.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11051800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.494/34.977/53.767/9.413 ms 11051800.ms:29.494 34.977 53.767 9.413 11051800.loss:0 11051830.ping:Wed Nov 5 18:30:20 PST 2008 11051830.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=210 ms 11051830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=218 ms 11051830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=29.8 ms 11051830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=29.3 ms 11051830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=31.0 ms 11051830.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11051830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.387/103.904/218.428/90.444 ms 11051830.ms:29.387 103.904 218.428 90.444 11051830.loss:0 11051900.ping:Wed Nov 5 19:00:20 PST 2008 11051900.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=30.4 ms 11051900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=30.5 ms 11051900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=33.7 ms 11051900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=33.0 ms 11051900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=6 ttl=239 time=33.1 ms 11051900.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051900.ping:6 packets transmitted, 5 received, 16% packet loss, time 5001ms 11051900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.482/32.194/33.722/1.382 ms 11051900.ms:30.482 32.194 33.722 1.382 11051900.loss:16 11051930.ping:Wed Nov 5 19:30:20 PST 2008 11051930.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11051930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=31.0 ms 11051930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=66.1 ms 11051930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=21.7 ms 11051930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=32.2 ms 11051930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=20.5 ms 11051930.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11051930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms 11051930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.548/34.372/66.189/16.598 ms 11051930.ms:20.548 34.372 66.189 16.598 11051930.loss:0 11052000.ping:Wed Nov 5 20:00:20 PST 2008 11052000.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11052000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=29.6 ms 11052000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=42.7 ms 11052000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=25.0 ms 11052000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=25.3 ms 11052000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=57.1 ms 11052000.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11052000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11052000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.049/35.993/57.182/12.403 ms 11052000.ms:25.049 35.993 57.182 12.403 11052000.loss:0 11052030.ping:Wed Nov 5 20:30:15 PST 2008 11052030.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11052030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=23.0 ms 11052030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.0 ms 11052030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=29.3 ms 11052030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.4 ms 11052030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=50.8 ms 11052030.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11052030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11052030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.411/29.349/50.859/11.122 ms 11052030.ms:21.411 29.349 50.859 11.122 11052030.loss:0 11052100.ping:Wed Nov 5 21:00:20 PST 2008 11052100.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11052100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.8 ms 11052100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=23.3 ms 11052100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.4 ms 11052100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=30.3 ms 11052100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=24.8 ms 11052100.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11052100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11052100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.463/24.789/30.380/2.911 ms 11052100.ms:22.463 24.789 30.380 2.911 11052100.loss:0 11052130.ping:Wed Nov 5 21:30:20 PST 2008 11052130.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11052130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=28.5 ms 11052130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=36.5 ms 11052130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=24.2 ms 11052130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.5 ms 11052130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=43.4 ms 11052130.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11052130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11052130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.582/30.850/43.406/8.062 ms 11052130.ms:21.582 30.850 43.406 8.062 11052130.loss:0 11052200.ping:Wed Nov 5 22:00:14 PST 2008 11052200.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11052200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=23.8 ms 11052200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=20.8 ms 11052200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=32.0 ms 11052200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=36.0 ms 11052200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=21.4 ms 11052200.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11052200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11052200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.808/26.825/36.013/6.115 ms 11052200.ms:20.808 26.825 36.013 6.115 11052200.loss:0 11052230.ping:Wed Nov 5 22:30:20 PST 2008 11052230.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11052230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=24.6 ms 11052230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=23.4 ms 11052230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=24.7 ms 11052230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=26.0 ms 11052230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=25.6 ms 11052230.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11052230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11052230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.494/24.925/26.069/0.903 ms 11052230.ms:23.494 24.925 26.069 0.903 11052230.loss:0 11052300.ping:Wed Nov 5 23:00:16 PST 2008 11052300.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11052300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=99.7 ms 11052300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=20.9 ms 11052300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=28.2 ms 11052300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=27.0 ms 11052300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=46.2 ms 11052300.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11052300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11052300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.941/44.460/99.710/28.886 ms 11052300.ms:20.941 44.460 99.710 28.886 11052300.loss:0 11052330.ping:Wed Nov 5 23:30:20 PST 2008 11052330.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11052330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=92.1 ms 11052330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=56.3 ms 11052330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.3 ms 11052330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=23.0 ms 11052330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=22.8 ms 11052330.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11052330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11052330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.380/43.365/92.134/27.646 ms 11052330.ms:22.380 43.365 92.134 27.646 11052330.loss:0 11060000.ping:Thu Nov 6 00:00:20 PST 2008 11060000.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=24.2 ms 11060000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=20.6 ms 11060000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.3 ms 11060000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=25.2 ms 11060000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=21.6 ms 11060000.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11060000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.643/22.833/25.217/1.670 ms 11060000.ms:20.643 22.833 25.217 1.670 11060000.loss:0 11060030.ping:Thu Nov 6 00:30:20 PST 2008 11060030.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=20.6 ms 11060030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=21.3 ms 11060030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=25.1 ms 11060030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.4 ms 11060030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=21.1 ms 11060030.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.633/21.916/25.112/1.625 ms 11060030.ms:20.633 21.916 25.112 1.625 11060030.loss:0 11060100.ping:Thu Nov 6 01:00:20 PST 2008 11060100.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.7 ms 11060100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.8 ms 11060100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=21.4 ms 11060100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=23.3 ms 11060100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=23.2 ms 11060100.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.469/22.727/23.359/0.681 ms 11060100.ms:21.469 22.727 23.359 0.681 11060100.loss:0 11060130.ping:Thu Nov 6 01:30:20 PST 2008 11060130.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=25.6 ms 11060130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=26.1 ms 11060130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=24.9 ms 11060130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=24.7 ms 11060130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=27.4 ms 11060130.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11060130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.743/25.782/27.405/0.966 ms 11060130.ms:24.743 25.782 27.405 0.966 11060130.loss:0 11060200.ping:Thu Nov 6 02:00:21 PST 2008 11060200.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=37.9 ms 11060200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=43.3 ms 11060200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=46.5 ms 11060200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.0 ms 11060200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=52.3 ms 11060200.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11060200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.004/40.228/52.333/10.684 ms 11060200.ms:21.004 40.228 52.333 10.684 11060200.loss:0 11060230.ping:Thu Nov 6 02:30:20 PST 2008 11060230.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=24.0 ms 11060230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=20.6 ms 11060230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=23.8 ms 11060230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=22.2 ms 11060230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=21.2 ms 11060230.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11060230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.645/22.419/24.072/1.378 ms 11060230.ms:20.645 22.419 24.072 1.378 11060230.loss:0 11060300.ping:Thu Nov 6 03:00:20 PST 2008 11060300.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=19.9 ms 11060300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=23.3 ms 11060300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.7 ms 11060300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.0 ms 11060300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=22.7 ms 11060300.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11060300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.923/21.974/23.388/1.285 ms 11060300.ms:19.923 21.974 23.388 1.285 11060300.loss:0 11060330.ping:Thu Nov 6 03:30:20 PST 2008 11060330.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.8 ms 11060330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=21.6 ms 11060330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=21.2 ms 11060330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.8 ms 11060330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=23.1 ms 11060330.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.200/22.139/23.149/0.748 ms 11060330.ms:21.200 22.139 23.149 0.748 11060330.loss:0 11060400.ping:Thu Nov 6 04:00:20 PST 2008 11060400.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=26.5 ms 11060400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=52.5 ms 11060400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=19.4 ms 11060400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=26.7 ms 11060400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=6 ttl=239 time=34.4 ms 11060400.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060400.ping:6 packets transmitted, 5 received, 16% packet loss, time 5002ms 11060400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.488/31.931/52.526/11.327 ms 11060400.ms:19.488 31.931 52.526 11.327 11060400.loss:16 11060430.ping:Thu Nov 6 04:30:21 PST 2008 11060430.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=34.4 ms 11060430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=52.1 ms 11060430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=63.0 ms 11060430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=115 ms 11060430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=71.7 ms 11060430.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11060430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.420/67.390/115.567/27.121 ms 11060430.ms:34.420 67.390 115.567 27.121 11060430.loss:0 11060500.ping:Thu Nov 6 05:00:20 PST 2008 11060500.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=158 ms 11060500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=194 ms 11060500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.1 ms 11060500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=19.8 ms 11060500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=36.3 ms 11060500.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11060500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.805/86.214/194.365/74.736 ms 11060500.ms:19.805 86.214 194.365 74.736 11060500.loss:0 11060530.ping:Thu Nov 6 05:30:20 PST 2008 11060530.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=20.2 ms 11060530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=20.7 ms 11060530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.4 ms 11060530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=22.9 ms 11060530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=22.8 ms 11060530.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 11060530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.205/21.851/22.946/1.150 ms 11060530.ms:20.205 21.851 22.946 1.150 11060530.loss:0 11060600.ping:Thu Nov 6 06:00:20 PST 2008 11060600.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=21.6 ms 11060600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=21.2 ms 11060600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=69.8 ms 11060600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=58.5 ms 11060600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=20.1 ms 11060600.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.132/38.308/69.879/21.475 ms 11060600.ms:20.132 38.308 69.879 21.475 11060600.loss:0 11060630.ping:Thu Nov 6 06:30:20 PST 2008 11060630.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=68.0 ms 11060630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=21.6 ms 11060630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.5 ms 11060630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=22.8 ms 11060630.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=46.2 ms 11060630.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11060630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.641/36.266/68.075/18.413 ms 11060630.ms:21.641 36.266 68.075 18.413 11060630.loss:0 11060700.ping:Thu Nov 6 07:00:21 PST 2008 11060700.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.3 ms 11060700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=32.5 ms 11060700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.2 ms 11060700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.3 ms 11060700.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=21.4 ms 11060700.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 11060700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.356/23.971/32.558/4.314 ms 11060700.ms:21.356 23.971 32.558 4.314 11060700.loss:0 11060730.ping:Thu Nov 6 07:30:20 PST 2008 11060730.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=77.5 ms 11060730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=77.9 ms 11060730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=43.3 ms 11060730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=71.6 ms 11060730.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=82.4 ms 11060730.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11060730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.319/70.580/82.475/14.060 ms 11060730.ms:43.319 70.580 82.475 14.060 11060730.loss:0 11060800.ping:Thu Nov 6 08:00:20 PST 2008 11060800.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=20.5 ms 11060800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=24.2 ms 11060800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=23.0 ms 11060800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=22.2 ms 11060800.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=26.5 ms 11060800.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11060800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.582/23.340/26.557/2.001 ms 11060800.ms:20.582 23.340 26.557 2.001 11060800.loss:0 11060830.ping:Thu Nov 6 08:30:20 PST 2008 11060830.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=28.7 ms 11060830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=23.4 ms 11060830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=28.6 ms 11060830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=22.4 ms 11060830.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=104 ms 11060830.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11060830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.401/41.571/104.573/31.610 ms 11060830.ms:22.401 41.571 104.573 31.610 11060830.loss:0 11060900.ping:Thu Nov 6 09:00:20 PST 2008 11060900.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=54.7 ms 11060900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=23.4 ms 11060900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.1 ms 11060900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=23.1 ms 11060900.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=36.2 ms 11060900.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11060900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.176/31.959/54.707/12.500 ms 11060900.ms:22.176 31.959 54.707 12.500 11060900.loss:0 11060930.ping:Thu Nov 6 09:30:21 PST 2008 11060930.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=26.0 ms 11060930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.7 ms 11060930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=25.5 ms 11060930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=36.1 ms 11060930.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=24.5 ms 11060930.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11060930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11060930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.730/27.005/36.129/4.702 ms 11060930.ms:22.730 27.005 36.129 4.702 11060930.loss:0 11061000.ping:Thu Nov 6 10:00:21 PST 2008 11061000.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=24.2 ms 11061000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=21.3 ms 11061000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=23.1 ms 11061000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=22.4 ms 11061000.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=22.9 ms 11061000.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11061000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.388/22.828/24.278/0.959 ms 11061000.ms:21.388 22.828 24.278 0.959 11061000.loss:0 11061030.ping:Thu Nov 6 10:30:20 PST 2008 11061030.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.5 ms 11061030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=23.2 ms 11061030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=21.4 ms 11061030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.8 ms 11061030.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=22.7 ms 11061030.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 11061030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.466/22.380/23.269/0.677 ms 11061030.ms:21.466 22.380 23.269 0.677 11061030.loss:0 11061100.ping:Thu Nov 6 11:00:21 PST 2008 11061100.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=21.6 ms 11061100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.1 ms 11061100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=58.9 ms 11061100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=26.3 ms 11061100.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=22.8 ms 11061100.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11061100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.685/30.403/58.975/14.378 ms 11061100.ms:21.685 30.403 58.975 14.378 11061100.loss:0 11061130.ping:Thu Nov 6 11:30:21 PST 2008 11061130.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=110 ms 11061130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=75.0 ms 11061130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=76.4 ms 11061130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=63.1 ms 11061130.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=24.8 ms 11061130.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11061130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.809/70.077/110.946/27.683 ms 11061130.ms:24.809 70.077 110.946 27.683 11061130.loss:0 11061200.ping:Thu Nov 6 12:00:21 PST 2008 11061200.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=21.6 ms 11061200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=21.0 ms 11061200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.9 ms 11061200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=26.4 ms 11061200.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=22.1 ms 11061200.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.068/22.860/26.495/1.925 ms 11061200.ms:21.068 22.860 26.495 1.925 11061200.loss:0 11061230.ping:Thu Nov 6 12:30:21 PST 2008 11061230.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=38.1 ms 11061230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.2 ms 11061230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=21.4 ms 11061230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=22.1 ms 11061230.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=21.0 ms 11061230.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.098/25.006/38.108/6.565 ms 11061230.ms:21.098 25.006 38.108 6.565 11061230.loss:0 11061300.ping:Thu Nov 6 13:00:20 PST 2008 11061300.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=23.9 ms 11061300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=27.3 ms 11061300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=28.0 ms 11061300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.9 ms 11061300.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=36.9 ms 11061300.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3996ms 11061300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.964/27.649/36.969/5.162 ms 11061300.ms:21.964 27.649 36.969 5.162 11061300.loss:0 11061330.ping:Thu Nov 6 13:30:20 PST 2008 11061330.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=21.0 ms 11061330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=31.1 ms 11061330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=27.6 ms 11061330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=31.9 ms 11061330.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=21.8 ms 11061330.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11061330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.088/26.717/31.915/4.550 ms 11061330.ms:21.088 26.717 31.915 4.550 11061330.loss:0 11061400.ping:Thu Nov 6 14:00:21 PST 2008 11061400.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=20.9 ms 11061400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.5 ms 11061400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=36.9 ms 11061400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=22.3 ms 11061400.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=24.0 ms 11061400.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11061400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.959/25.389/36.982/5.882 ms 11061400.ms:20.959 25.389 36.982 5.882 11061400.loss:0 11061430.ping:Thu Nov 6 14:30:20 PST 2008 11061430.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=174 ms 11061430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=201 ms 11061430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=176 ms 11061430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=125 ms 11061430.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=177 ms 11061430.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11061430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 125.521/171.300/201.512/24.878 ms 11061430.ms:125.521 171.300 201.512 24.878 11061430.loss:0 11061500.ping:Thu Nov 6 15:00:20 PST 2008 11061500.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.9 ms 11061500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.4 ms 11061500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=22.5 ms 11061500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=21.9 ms 11061500.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=25.8 ms 11061500.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11061500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.965/23.144/25.815/1.380 ms 11061500.ms:21.965 23.144 25.815 1.380 11061500.loss:0 11061530.ping:Thu Nov 6 15:30:20 PST 2008 11061530.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=29.5 ms 11061530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=27.4 ms 11061530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=33.4 ms 11061530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=33.9 ms 11061530.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=21.7 ms 11061530.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11061530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.733/29.224/33.919/4.472 ms 11061530.ms:21.733 29.224 33.919 4.472 11061530.loss:0 11061600.ping:Thu Nov 6 16:00:21 PST 2008 11061600.ping:PING cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=252 ms 11061600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=204 ms 11061600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=154 ms 11061600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 time=236 ms 11061600.ping:64 bytes from cesium.clock.org (192.5.16.65): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 time=193 ms 11061600.ping:--- cesium.clock.org ping statistics --- 11061600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11061600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 154.863/208.329/252.240/34.157 ms 1