1915.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:16:41 GMT 2002 1915.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.982 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=49.926 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.923 msec 1915.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1915.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1915.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.982/27.339/49.926/12.116 ms 1915.ms:16.982 27.339 49.926 12.116 1915.loss:0 1930.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:31:41 GMT 2002 1930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.080 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.930 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.929 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.937 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.925 msec 1930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1930.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.930/32.360/39.937/7.418 ms 1930.ms:19.930 32.360 39.937 7.418 1930.loss:0 1945.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:46:41 GMT 2002 1945.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.328 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.951 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1945.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1945.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1945.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/22.627/29.951/3.888 ms 1945.ms:19.948 22.627 29.951 3.888 1945.loss:0 2000.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:01:42 GMT 2002 2000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.223 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.956 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 2000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.949/28.407/32.223/4.320 ms 2000.ms:19.949 28.407 32.223 4.320 2000.loss:0 2015.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:16:42 GMT 2002 2015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=36.336 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.955 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.954 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.961 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=49.952 msec 2015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.955/39.231/49.952/6.490 ms 2015.ms:29.955 39.231 49.952 6.490 2015.loss:0 2030.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:31:41 GMT 2002 2030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.103 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.945 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.614 msec 2030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.614/30.307/32.103/0.926 ms 2030.ms:29.614 30.307 32.103 0.926 2030.loss:0 2045.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:46:41 GMT 2002 2045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.583 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 2045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.941/22.670/29.941/3.902 ms 2045.loss:0 2045.ms:19.941 22.670 29.941 3.902 2100.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:01:41 GMT 2002 2100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.811 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 2100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.944/20.319/21.811/0.761 ms 2100.ms:19.944 20.319 21.811 0.761 2100.loss:0 2115.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:16:41 GMT 2002 2115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.438 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.931 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 2115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.931/24.433/29.939/4.582 ms 2115.ms:19.931 24.433 29.939 4.582 2115.loss:0 2130.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:31:41 GMT 2002 2130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.560 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 2130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/22.065/29.946/3.950 ms 2130.ms:19.933 22.065 29.946 3.950 2130.loss:0 2145.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:46:41 GMT 2002 2145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.707 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.953 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.960 msec 2145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.707/25.896/29.960/4.963 ms 2145.ms:19.707 25.896 29.960 4.963 2145.loss:0 2200.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:01:41 GMT 2002 2200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.145 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 2200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.942/20.387/22.145/0.888 ms 2200.ms:19.942 20.387 22.145 0.888 2200.loss:0 2215.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:16:41 GMT 2002 2215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.292 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 2215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.292/18.608/19.960/2.662 ms 2215.ms:13.292 18.608 19.960 2.662 2215.loss:0 2230.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:31:41 GMT 2002 2230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.632 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.632/19.286/19.951/1.330 ms 2230.ms:16.632 19.286 19.951 1.330 2230.loss:0 2245.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:46:41 GMT 2002 2245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.311 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 2245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.957/20.030/20.311/0.166 ms 2245.ms:19.957 20.030 20.311 0.166 2245.loss:0 2300.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:01:48 GMT 2002 2300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.180 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.059 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.901 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 2300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.059/20.203/22.180/1.043 ms 2300.ms:19.059 20.203 22.180 1.043 2300.loss:0 2315.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:17:00 GMT 2002 2315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.409 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.924 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 2315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.924/22.426/29.937/3.879 ms 2315.ms:19.924 22.426 29.937 3.879 2315.loss:0 2330.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:31:42 GMT 2002 2330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.649 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.932 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.870 msec 2330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/31.065/39.932/7.882 ms 2330.ms:19.935 31.065 39.932 7.882 2330.loss:0 2345.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:46:56 GMT 2002 2345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.742 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.934 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.781 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 2345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.742/23.865/39.781/7.958 ms 2345.ms:19.742 23.865 39.781 7.958 2345.loss:0 0000.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:01:41 GMT 2002 0000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=27.273 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.951 msec 0000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 27.273/29.413/29.952/1.075 ms 0000.ms:27.273 29.413 29.952 1.075 0000.loss:0 0015.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:16:41 GMT 2002 0015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=42.727 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.952 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.968 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.947 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 0015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.968/32.510/42.727/8.126 ms 0015.ms:19.968 32.510 42.727 8.126 0015.loss:0 0030.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:31:42 GMT 2002 0030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=56.553 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=79.576 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=59.810 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.652 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.862 msec 0030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 39.652/55.090/79.576/14.795 ms 0030.ms:39.652 55.090 79.576 14.795 0030.loss:0 0045.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:46:41 GMT 2002 0045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=12.704 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.967 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.973 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 12.704/18.513/19.973/2.907 ms 0045.ms:12.704 18.513 19.973 2.907 0045.loss:0 0100.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:01:41 GMT 2002 0100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.703 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.770 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.769 msec 0100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.703/21.028/29.944/4.736 ms 0100.ms:15.703 21.028 29.944 4.736 0100.loss:0 0115.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:16:41 GMT 2002 0115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.718 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.964 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.941/22.508/29.964/3.879 ms 0115.ms:19.941 22.508 29.964 3.879 0115.loss:0 0130.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:31:41 GMT 2002 0130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=29.223 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=129.945 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=89.940 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.938 msec 0130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.223/63.796/129.945/39.926 ms 0130.ms:29.223 63.796 129.945 39.926 0130.loss:0 0145.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:46:41 GMT 2002 0145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.227 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.942 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/24.202/29.946/4.712 ms 0145.ms:19.939 24.202 29.946 4.712 0145.loss:0 0200.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:01:42 GMT 2002 0200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.415 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=18.526 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.526/20.757/25.415/2.393 ms 0200.ms:18.526 20.757 25.415 2.393 0200.loss:0 0215.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:16:41 GMT 2002 0215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=31.770 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.940 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.943 msec 0215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.941/34.307/39.943/4.652 ms 0215.ms:29.941 34.307 39.943 4.652 0215.loss:0 0230.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:31:41 GMT 2002 0230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=27.810 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.930 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.938 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 27.810/31.513/39.938/4.293 ms 0230.ms:27.810 31.513 39.938 4.293 0230.loss:0 0245.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:46:42 GMT 2002 0245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=167.495 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 0245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.938/49.451/167.495/59.022 ms 0245.ms:19.938 49.451 167.495 59.022 0245.loss:0 0300.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:01:42 GMT 2002 0300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=49.251 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.943 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.951 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.946 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.943/37.807/49.251/7.263 ms 0300.ms:29.943 37.807 49.251 7.263 0300.loss:0 0315.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:16:41 GMT 2002 0315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=39.421 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.958 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.949 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.958 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.955 msec 0315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.958/37.848/39.958/3.952 ms 0315.ms:29.958 37.848 39.958 3.952 0315.loss:0 0330.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:31:44 GMT 2002 0330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.803 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.929 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.917 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.919 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.902 msec 0330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.919/27.094/29.929/3.925 ms 0330.ms:19.919 27.094 29.929 3.925 0330.loss:0 0345.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:46:42 GMT 2002 0345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=37.260 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.944 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.945 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.931 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=59.944 msec 0345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.931/37.404/59.944/13.234 ms 0345.ms:19.931 37.404 59.944 13.234 0345.loss:0 0400.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:01:42 GMT 2002 0400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.376 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.947 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 0400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0400.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/26.227/29.947/4.577 ms 0400.ms:19.933 26.227 29.947 4.577 0400.loss:0 0415.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:16:43 GMT 2002 0415.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.767 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.918 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.918 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.865 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.707 msec 0415.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0415.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0415.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.767/23.635/29.918/5.123 ms 0415.ms:18.767 23.635 29.918 5.123 0415.loss:0 0430.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:31:42 GMT 2002 0430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=28.692 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.932 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.934 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 0430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0430.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/25.685/29.934/4.721 ms 0430.ms:19.935 25.685 29.934 4.721 0430.loss:0 0445.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:46:41 GMT 2002 0445.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.498 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.805 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.931 msec 0445.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0445.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0445.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.498/22.622/29.931/6.367 ms 0445.ms:13.498 22.622 29.931 6.367 0445.loss:0 0500.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:01:42 GMT 2002 0500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=34.304 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.942 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.934 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.930 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.452 msec 0500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0500.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.452/30.712/34.304/1.812 ms 0500.ms:29.452 30.712 34.304 1.812 0500.loss:0 0515.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:16:42 GMT 2002 0515.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=148.241 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=159.941 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=169.947 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=129.943 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=119.947 msec 0515.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0515.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0515.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 119.947/145.603/169.947/18.492 ms 0515.ms:119.947 145.603 169.947 18.492 0515.loss:0 0530.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:31:41 GMT 2002 0530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=33.999 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.956 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 0530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0530.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.938/30.759/33.999/1.634 ms 0530.ms:29.938 30.759 33.999 1.634 0530.loss:0 0545.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:46:41 GMT 2002 0545.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.250 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 0545.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0545.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0545.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.250/19.209/19.957/1.482 ms 0545.ms:16.250 19.209 19.957 1.482 0545.loss:0 0600.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:01:41 GMT 2002 0600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.538 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=33.358 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 0600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0600.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/23.149/33.358/5.202 ms 0600.ms:19.945 23.149 33.358 5.202 0600.loss:0 0615.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:16:41 GMT 2002 0615.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.488 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 0615.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0615.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0615.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.488/19.644/19.952/0.605 ms 0615.ms:18.488 19.644 19.952 0.605 0615.loss:0 0630.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:31:41 GMT 2002 0630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.450 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0630.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.937/20.043/20.450/0.255 ms 0630.ms:19.937 20.043 20.450 0.255 0630.loss:0 0645.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:46:42 GMT 2002 0645.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.923 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0645.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0645.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0645.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.923/19.139/19.948/1.612 ms 0645.ms:15.923 19.139 19.948 1.612 0645.loss:0 0700.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:01:41 GMT 2002 0700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.656 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 0700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0700.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.893/20.477/22.656/1.097 ms 0700.ms:19.893 20.477 22.656 1.097 0700.loss:0 0715.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:16:41 GMT 2002 0715.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=24.122 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0715.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0715.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0715.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/22.778/29.938/3.932 ms 0715.loss:0 0715.ms:19.939 22.778 29.938 3.932 0730.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:31:43 GMT 2002 0730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.573 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.916 msec 0730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0730.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.573/19.867/19.953/0.213 ms 0730.ms:19.573 19.867 19.953 0.213 0730.loss:0 0745.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:46:41 GMT 2002 0745.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.892 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0745.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0745.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0745.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.892/19.144/19.961/1.626 ms 0745.ms:15.892 19.144 19.961 1.626 0745.loss:0 0800.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:01:41 GMT 2002 0800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.077 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.961 msec 0800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0800.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/25.974/29.961/4.870 ms 0800.ms:19.948 25.974 29.961 4.870 0800.loss:0 0815.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:16:41 GMT 2002 0815.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.447 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.950 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0815.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0815.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0815.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.953/22.652/29.950/3.895 ms 0815.ms:19.953 22.652 29.950 3.895 0815.loss:0 0830.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:31:41 GMT 2002 0830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.823 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.969 msec 0830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0830.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.823/19.132/19.969/1.656 ms 0830.ms:15.823 19.132 19.969 1.656 0830.loss:0 0845.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:46:41 GMT 2002 0845.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=29.965 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0845.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0845.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0845.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/21.945/29.965/4.012 ms 0845.ms:19.939 21.945 29.965 4.012 0845.loss:0 0900.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:01:41 GMT 2002 0900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.879 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0900.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/28.530/32.879/4.446 ms 0900.ms:19.933 28.530 32.879 4.446 0900.loss:0 0915.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:16:41 GMT 2002 0915.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.427 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0915.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0915.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0915.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/20.640/23.427/1.404 ms 0915.ms:19.935 20.640 23.427 1.404 0915.loss:0 0930.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:31:40 GMT 2002 0930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.463 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=109.949 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0930.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.463/36.650/109.949/36.735 ms 0930.ms:13.463 36.650 109.949 36.735 0930.loss:0 0945.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:46:41 GMT 2002 0945.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.206 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=49.946 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.959 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 0945.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0945.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0945.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.206/27.604/49.946/11.918 ms 0945.ms:18.206 27.604 49.946 11.918 0945.loss:0 1000.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:01:41 GMT 2002 1000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.874 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.963 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.906 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.874/19.327/19.963/1.236 ms 1000.ms:16.874 19.327 19.963 1.236 1000.loss:0 1015.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:16:40 GMT 2002 1015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.330 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/20.626/23.330/1.352 ms 1015.ms:19.933 20.626 23.330 1.352 1015.loss:0 1030.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:31:41 GMT 2002 1030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.833 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/20.532/22.833/1.157 ms 1030.ms:19.952 20.532 22.833 1.157 1030.loss:0 1045.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:46:41 GMT 2002 1045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.369 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.753 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.951/22.398/29.753/3.796 ms 1045.ms:19.951 22.398 29.753 3.796 1045.loss:0 1100.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:01:41 GMT 2002 1100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.623 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.891 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.891/20.270/21.623/0.688 ms 1100.ms:19.891 20.270 21.623 0.688 1100.loss:0 1115.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:16:41 GMT 2002 1115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=12.115 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.936 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 1115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 12.115/20.376/29.936/5.660 ms 1115.ms:12.115 20.376 29.936 5.660 1115.loss:0 1130.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:31:41 GMT 2002 1130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.954 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.924 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.924/20.540/22.954/1.216 ms 1130.ms:19.924 20.540 22.954 1.216 1130.loss:0 1145.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:46:40 GMT 2002 1145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.774 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=169.940 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.774/49.707/169.940/60.118 ms 1145.ms:18.774 49.707 169.940 60.118 1145.loss:0 1200.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:01:41 GMT 2002 1200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.418 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.903 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.418/19.036/19.961/1.817 ms 1200.ms:15.418 19.036 19.961 1.817 1200.loss:0 1215.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:16:40 GMT 2002 1215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.399 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.963 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 1215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.399/18.844/19.963/2.224 ms 1215.ms:14.399 18.844 19.963 2.224 1215.loss:0 1230.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:31:41 GMT 2002 1230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.057 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.951 msec 1230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.946/23.973/39.951/7.989 ms 1230.ms:19.946 23.973 39.951 7.989 1230.loss:0 1245.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:46:41 GMT 2002 1245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.028 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.910 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.917 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.895 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.915 msec 1245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.895/20.933/25.028/2.047 ms 1245.ms:19.895 20.933 25.028 2.047 1245.loss:0 1300.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:01:40 GMT 2002 1300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=17.873 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.873/19.539/19.960/0.833 ms 1300.ms:17.873 19.539 19.960 0.833 1300.loss:0 1315.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:16:41 GMT 2002 1315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.454 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.905 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.845 msec 1315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.454/19.210/19.925/1.384 ms 1315.ms:16.454 19.210 19.925 1.384 1315.loss:0 1330.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:31:41 GMT 2002 1330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.695 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.929/20.691/23.695/1.509 ms 1330.ms:19.929 20.691 23.695 1.509 1330.loss:0 1345.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:46:41 GMT 2002 1345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.204 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 1345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.204/19.793/19.944/0.307 ms 1345.ms:19.204 19.793 19.944 0.307 1345.loss:0 1400.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:01:41 GMT 2002 1400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.509 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1400.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.509/19.257/19.951/1.379 ms 1400.ms:16.509 19.257 19.951 1.379 1400.loss:0 1415.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:16:41 GMT 2002 1415.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=11.637 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1415.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1415.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1415.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 11.637/20.286/29.957/5.809 ms 1415.ms:11.637 20.286 29.957 5.809 1415.loss:0 1430.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:31:42 GMT 2002 1430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=39.538 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1430.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.942/25.863/39.538/7.858 ms 1430.ms:19.942 25.863 39.538 7.858 1430.loss:0 1445.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:46:41 GMT 2002 1445.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.161 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1445.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1445.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1445.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.161/19.791/19.954/0.339 ms 1445.ms:19.161 19.791 19.954 0.339 1445.loss:0 1500.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:01:41 GMT 2002 1500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.352 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.966 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1500.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.352/18.836/19.966/2.245 ms 1500.ms:14.352 18.836 19.966 2.245 1500.loss:0 1515.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:16:41 GMT 2002 1515.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.603 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.955 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1515.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1515.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1515.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/24.284/29.957/4.673 ms 1515.ms:19.952 24.284 29.957 4.673 1515.loss:0 1530.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:31:42 GMT 2002 1530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.011 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.420 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=17.957 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.913 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.778 msec 1530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1530.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.957/19.415/20.011/0.776 ms 1530.ms:17.957 19.415 20.011 0.776 1530.loss:0 1545.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:46:41 GMT 2002 1545.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.106 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.920 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.918 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.922 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1545.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1545.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1545.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.106/19.557/19.923/0.747 ms 1545.ms:18.106 19.557 19.923 0.747 1545.loss:0 1600.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:01:42 GMT 2002 1600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=28.570 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.950 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.945 msec 1600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1600.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.944/29.670/39.945/6.351 ms 1600.ms:19.944 29.670 39.945 6.351 1600.loss:0 1615.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:16:41 GMT 2002 1615.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.831 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.891 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 1615.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1615.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1615.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.831/19.900/19.936/0.182 ms 1615.ms:19.831 19.900 19.936 0.182 1615.loss:0 1630.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:31:41 GMT 2002 1630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.623 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1630.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/22.484/29.937/3.870 ms 1630.ms:19.952 22.484 29.937 3.870 1630.loss:0 1645.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:46:41 GMT 2002 1645.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.664 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1645.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1645.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1645.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.947/20.296/21.664/0.689 ms 1645.ms:19.947 20.296 21.664 0.689 1645.loss:0 1700.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:01:42 GMT 2002 1700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=30.113 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.934 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=199.961 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1700.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.957/61.986/199.961/69.385 ms 1700.ms:19.957 61.986 199.961 69.385 1700.loss:0 1715.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:16:41 GMT 2002 1715.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.259 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.948 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1715.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1715.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1715.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.953/22.014/29.948/3.970 ms 1715.ms:19.953 22.014 29.948 3.970 1715.loss:0 1724.ping:+ date 1724.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:26:33 GMT 2002 1724.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1724.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1724.ping:+ p=11904 1724.ping:+ wait 1724.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1724.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=48.132 msec 1724.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.910 msec 1724.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1724.ping:2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss 1724.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.910/39.021/48.132/9.111 ms 1724.ms:29.910 39.021 48.132 9.111 1724.loss:0 1730.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:31:41 GMT 2002 1730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.979 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.959 msec 1730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1730.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.979/21.160/29.959/4.664 ms 1730.ms:15.979 21.160 29.959 4.664 1730.loss:0 1736.ping:+ date 1736.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:37:24 GMT 2002 1736.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1736.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1736.ping:+ p=12695 1736.ping:+ wait 1736.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1736.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1736.ping:1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss 1736.ms:399 399 399 1736.loss:100 1738.ping:+ date 1738.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:38:32 GMT 2002 1738.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1738.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1738.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.704 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.914 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1738.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1738.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1738.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.704/22.887/29.941/6.066 ms 1738.ms:14.704 22.887 29.941 6.066 1738.loss:0 1745.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:45:32 GMT 2002 1745.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.987 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.901 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.924 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1745.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1745.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1745.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/25.141/29.924/4.476 ms 1745.ms:19.945 25.141 29.924 4.476 1745.loss:0 1800.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:00:34 GMT 2002 1800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=34.809 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.928 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 1800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1800.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.917/28.903/34.809/4.875 ms 1800.ms:19.917 28.903 34.809 4.875 1800.loss:0 1815.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:15:32 GMT 2002 1815.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=45.142 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.930 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1815.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1815.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1815.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.929/24.976/45.142/10.084 ms 1815.ms:19.929 24.976 45.142 10.084 1815.loss:0 1830.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:30:33 GMT 2002 1830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=26.380 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.936 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=149.945 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 1830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1830.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 26.380/53.229/149.945/48.377 ms 1830.ms:26.380 53.229 149.945 48.377 1830.loss:0 1845.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:45:34 GMT 2002 1845.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.334 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.917 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.927 msec 1845.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1845.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1845.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.334/18.808/19.932/2.240 ms 1845.ms:14.334 18.808 19.932 2.240 1845.loss:0 1900.ping:Fri Feb 22 19:00:34 GMT 2002 1900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=17.312 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.906 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1900.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.312/19.403/19.938/1.049 ms 1900.ms:17.312 19.403 19.938 1.049 1900.loss:0 11060230.ping:Fri Nov 6 02:30:16 PST 2009 11060230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=59.8 ms 11060230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11060230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11060230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=77.9 ms 11060230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11060230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.831/50.274/77.978/16.263 ms 11060230.ms:37.831 50.274 77.978 16.263 11060230.loss:0 11060300.ping:Fri Nov 6 03:00:17 PST 2009 11060300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11060300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.0 ms 11060300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11060300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11060300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11060300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11060300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.036/41.346/51.095/5.746 ms 11060300.ms:33.036 41.346 51.095 5.746 11060300.loss:0 11060330.ping:Fri Nov 6 03:30:16 PST 2009 11060330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11060330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=67.7 ms 11060330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=68.1 ms 11060330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11060330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11060330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.003/50.293/68.183/14.444 ms 11060330.ms:38.003 50.293 68.183 14.444 11060330.loss:0 11060400.ping:Fri Nov 6 04:00:10 PST 2009 11060400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.0 ms 11060400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11060400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11060400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11060400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11060400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11060400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.075/39.960/49.127/5.759 ms 11060400.ms:31.075 39.960 49.127 5.759 11060400.loss:0 11060430.ping:Fri Nov 6 04:30:16 PST 2009 11060430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.5 ms 11060430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.2 ms 11060430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=30.8 ms 11060430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11060430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11060430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11060430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.296/36.123/49.152/7.445 ms 11060430.ms:30.296 36.123 49.152 7.445 11060430.loss:0 11060500.ping:Fri Nov 6 05:00:16 PST 2009 11060500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11060500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11060500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 11060500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=52.7 ms 11060500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=22.6 ms 11060500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.640/35.621/52.749/9.701 ms 11060500.ms:22.640 35.621 52.749 9.701 11060500.loss:0 11060530.ping:Fri Nov 6 05:30:16 PST 2009 11060530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11060530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11060530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11060530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11060530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11060530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11060530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.510/37.061/37.804/0.846 ms 11060530.ms:35.510 37.061 37.804 0.846 11060530.loss:0 11060600.ping:Fri Nov 6 06:00:17 PST 2009 11060600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 11060600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=26.6 ms 11060600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11060600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=66.6 ms 11060600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=26.7 ms 11060600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.692/41.329/66.688/15.229 ms 11060600.ms:26.692 41.329 66.688 15.229 11060600.loss:0 11060630.ping:Fri Nov 6 06:30:16 PST 2009 11060630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=44.9 ms 11060630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11060630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11060630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11060630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11060630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.524/35.911/44.936/4.519 ms 11060630.ms:33.524 35.911 44.936 4.519 11060630.loss:0 11060700.ping:Fri Nov 6 07:00:15 PST 2009 11060700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11060700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11060700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 11060700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.5 ms 11060700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11060700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11060700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.376/39.640/53.575/8.192 ms 11060700.ms:32.376 39.640 53.575 8.192 11060700.loss:0 11060730.ping:Fri Nov 6 07:30:16 PST 2009 11060730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11060730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11060730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 11060730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11060730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11060730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11060730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.042/35.815/44.364/4.290 ms 11060730.ms:33.042 35.815 44.364 4.290 11060730.loss:0 11060800.ping:Fri Nov 6 08:00:10 PST 2009 11060800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=80.1 ms 11060800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11060800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11060800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11060800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.4 ms 11060800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11060800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.492/47.191/80.124/16.911 ms 11060800.ms:31.492 47.191 80.124 16.911 11060800.loss:0 11060830.ping:Fri Nov 6 08:30:10 PST 2009 11060830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11060830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11060830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 11060830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11060830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 11060830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11060830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.246/40.546/43.274/3.735 ms 11060830.ms:33.246 40.546 43.274 3.735 11060830.loss:0 11060900.ping:Fri Nov 6 09:00:16 PST 2009 11060900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=255 ms 11060900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=293 ms 11060900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=333 ms 11060900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=414 ms 11060900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=513 ms 11060900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11060900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 255.515/362.299/513.813/92.217 ms 11060900.ms:255.515 362.299 513.813 92.217 11060900.loss:0 11060930.ping:Fri Nov 6 09:30:10 PST 2009 11060930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11060930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11060930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.7 ms 11060930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.8 ms 11060930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.9 ms 11060930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=68.6 ms 11060930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11060930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11060930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.822/49.808/68.637/11.669 ms 11060930.ms:31.822 49.808 68.637 11.669 11060930.loss:0 11061000.ping:Fri Nov 6 10:00:16 PST 2009 11061000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=53.3 ms 11061000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=54.2 ms 11061000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.3 ms 11061000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 11061000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.3 ms 11061000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11061000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.305/48.734/54.230/4.163 ms 11061000.ms:45.305 48.734 54.230 4.163 11061000.loss:0 11061030.ping:Fri Nov 6 10:30:16 PST 2009 11061030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.9 ms 11061030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11061030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=26.1 ms 11061030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11061030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 11061030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms 11061030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.180/35.719/47.988/7.125 ms 11061030.ms:26.180 35.719 47.988 7.125 11061030.loss:0 11061100.ping:Fri Nov 6 11:00:16 PST 2009 11061100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11061100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11061100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11061100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11061100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.9 ms 11061100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.863/38.402/44.921/3.803 ms 11061100.ms:34.863 38.402 44.921 3.803 11061100.loss:0 11061130.ping:Fri Nov 6 11:30:16 PST 2009 11061130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=57.6 ms 11061130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11061130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=26.0 ms 11061130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.8 ms 11061130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11061130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.032/40.316/57.687/10.705 ms 11061130.ms:26.032 40.316 57.687 10.705 11061130.loss:0 11061200.ping:Fri Nov 6 12:00:16 PST 2009 11061200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=392 ms 11061200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=339 ms 11061200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=370 ms 11061200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=278 ms 11061200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=308 ms 11061200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4054ms 11061200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 278.542/337.995/392.945/41.155 ms 11061200.ms:278.542 337.995 392.945 41.155 11061200.loss:0 11061230.ping:Fri Nov 6 12:30:16 PST 2009 11061230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11061230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11061230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=26.1 ms 11061230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.8 ms 11061230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=25.8 ms 11061230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.874/34.546/45.835/7.714 ms 11061230.ms:25.874 34.546 45.835 7.714 11061230.loss:0 11061300.ping:Fri Nov 6 13:00:16 PST 2009 11061300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11061300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.5 ms 11061300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11061300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 11061300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.2 ms 11061300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11061300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.561/38.728/45.561/5.067 ms 11061300.ms:34.561 38.728 45.561 5.067 11061300.loss:0 11061330.ping:Fri Nov 6 13:30:16 PST 2009 11061330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=61.0 ms 11061330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.9 ms 11061330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 11061330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.4 ms 11061330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11061330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.389/49.934/61.076/6.863 ms 11061330.ms:39.389 49.934 61.076 6.863 11061330.loss:0 11061400.ping:Fri Nov 6 14:00:16 PST 2009 11061400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=72.4 ms 11061400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 11061400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=64.3 ms 11061400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11061400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.2 ms 11061400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11061400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.433/50.585/72.438/15.651 ms 11061400.ms:33.433 50.585 72.438 15.651 11061400.loss:0 11061430.ping:Fri Nov 6 14:30:16 PST 2009 11061430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=25.5 ms 11061430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=53.7 ms 11061430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=64.0 ms 11061430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.5 ms 11061430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11061430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.528/46.129/64.090/14.258 ms 11061430.ms:25.528 46.129 64.090 14.258 11061430.loss:0 11061500.ping:Fri Nov 6 15:00:16 PST 2009 11061500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11061500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11061500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 11061500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11061500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 11061500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11061500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.666/35.974/44.823/4.468 ms 11061500.ms:32.666 35.974 44.823 4.468 11061500.loss:0 11061530.ping:Fri Nov 6 15:30:16 PST 2009 11061530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11061530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11061530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11061530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11061530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=71.5 ms 11061530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11061530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.816/42.478/71.574/14.932 ms 11061530.ms:31.816 42.478 71.574 14.932 11061530.loss:0 11061600.ping:Fri Nov 6 16:00:16 PST 2009 11061600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.7 ms 11061600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11061600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11061600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=108 ms 11061600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11061600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11061600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.762/51.914/108.507/28.559 ms 11061600.ms:30.762 51.914 108.507 28.559 11061600.loss:0 11061630.ping:Fri Nov 6 16:30:16 PST 2009 11061630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11061630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 11061630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.6 ms 11061630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11061630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11061630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11061630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.661/43.025/51.654/4.372 ms 11061630.ms:39.661 43.025 51.654 4.372 11061630.loss:0 11061700.ping:Fri Nov 6 17:00:16 PST 2009 11061700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.4 ms 11061700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11061700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 11061700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 11061700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=180 ms 11061700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.923/79.223/180.799/54.556 ms 11061700.ms:40.923 79.223 180.799 54.556 11061700.loss:0 11061730.ping:Fri Nov 6 17:30:16 PST 2009 11061730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=51.6 ms 11061730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=59.7 ms 11061730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=59.5 ms 11061730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.8 ms 11061730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11061730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.798/52.112/59.706/7.349 ms 11061730.ms:39.798 52.112 59.706 7.349 11061730.loss:0 11061800.ping:Fri Nov 6 18:00:16 PST 2009 11061800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.9 ms 11061800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11061800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11061800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.8 ms 11061800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=22.9 ms 11061800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11061800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.920/40.385/53.883/11.480 ms 11061800.ms:22.920 40.385 53.883 11.480 11061800.loss:0 11061830.ping:Fri Nov 6 18:30:16 PST 2009 11061830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 11061830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11061830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.1 ms 11061830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.3 ms 11061830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11061830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11061830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.158/36.477/49.670/7.943 ms 11061830.ms:28.158 36.477 49.670 7.943 11061830.loss:0 11061900.ping:Fri Nov 6 19:00:16 PST 2009 11061900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11061900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11061900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=62.1 ms 11061900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11061900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=62.9 ms 11061900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11061900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.144/49.930/62.924/10.356 ms 11061900.ms:40.144 49.930 62.924 10.356 11061900.loss:0 11061930.ping:Fri Nov 6 19:30:16 PST 2009 11061930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11061930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11061930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11061930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11061930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11061930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11061930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11061930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11061930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.776/35.351/41.836/3.282 ms 11061930.ms:32.776 35.351 41.836 3.282 11061930.loss:0 11062000.ping:Fri Nov 6 20:00:16 PST 2009 11062000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11062000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11062000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11062000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11062000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=67.2 ms 11062000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11062000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11062000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11062000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.060/42.481/67.234/12.400 ms 11062000.ms:35.060 42.481 67.234 12.400 11062000.loss:0 11062030.ping:Fri Nov 6 20:30:17 PST 2009 11062030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11062030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.4 ms 11062030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11062030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11062030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=66.0 ms 11062030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11062030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11062030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11062030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.402/40.909/66.088/13.157 ms 11062030.ms:27.402 40.909 66.088 13.157 11062030.loss:0 11062100.ping:Fri Nov 6 21:00:16 PST 2009 11062100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11062100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11062100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 11062100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 11062100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11062100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11062100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11062100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11062100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.978/35.678/36.792/0.664 ms 11062100.ms:34.978 35.678 36.792 0.664 11062100.loss:0 11062130.ping:Fri Nov 6 21:30:16 PST 2009 11062130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11062130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11062130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11062130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11062130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11062130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=62.1 ms 11062130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11062130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11062130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.169/43.812/62.136/9.902 ms 11062130.ms:32.169 43.812 62.136 9.902 11062130.loss:0 11062200.ping:Fri Nov 6 22:00:17 PST 2009 11062200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11062200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11062200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11062200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11062200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=25.0 ms 11062200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11062200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11062200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11062200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.003/33.419/36.482/4.242 ms 11062200.ms:25.003 33.419 36.482 4.242 11062200.loss:0 11062230.ping:Fri Nov 6 22:30:16 PST 2009 11062230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11062230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 11062230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.2 ms 11062230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11062230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11062230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 11062230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11062230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11062230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.059/39.752/49.258/6.764 ms 11062230.ms:28.059 39.752 49.258 6.764 11062230.loss:0 11062300.ping:Fri Nov 6 23:00:16 PST 2009 11062300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11062300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=105 ms 11062300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=83.9 ms 11062300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=74.7 ms 11062300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=95.3 ms 11062300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=105 ms 11062300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11062300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11062300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 74.709/93.098/105.900/12.229 ms 11062300.ms:74.709 93.098 105.900 12.229 11062300.loss:0 11062330.ping:Fri Nov 6 23:30:17 PST 2009 11062330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11062330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=88.5 ms 11062330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=89.4 ms 11062330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=90.3 ms 11062330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=90.9 ms 11062330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=93.2 ms 11062330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11062330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11062330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 88.551/90.519/93.285/1.649 ms 11062330.ms:88.551 90.519 93.285 1.649 11062330.loss:0 11070000.ping:Sat Nov 7 00:00:17 PST 2009 11070000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=99.5 ms 11070000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=98.0 ms 11070000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=97.7 ms 11070000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=117 ms 11070000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=88.6 ms 11070000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 88.609/100.318/117.622/9.477 ms 11070000.ms:88.609 100.318 117.622 9.477 11070000.loss:0 11070030.ping:Sat Nov 7 00:30:17 PST 2009 11070030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=86.7 ms 11070030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=94.5 ms 11070030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=75.5 ms 11070030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=94.5 ms 11070030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=94.8 ms 11070030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11070030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 75.563/89.248/94.827/7.489 ms 11070030.ms:75.563 89.248 94.827 7.489 11070030.loss:0 11070100.ping:Sat Nov 7 01:00:16 PST 2009 11070100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=85.5 ms 11070100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=101 ms 11070100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 11070100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=101 ms 11070100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=93.3 ms 11070100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.516/94.913/101.894/6.251 ms 11070100.ms:85.516 94.913 101.894 6.251 11070100.loss:0 11070130.ping:Sat Nov 7 01:30:17 PST 2009 11070130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=84.5 ms 11070130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=92.8 ms 11070130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=83.0 ms 11070130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=93.3 ms 11070130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=93.3 ms 11070130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 83.087/89.434/93.376/4.606 ms 11070130.ms:83.087 89.434 93.376 4.606 11070130.loss:0 11070200.ping:Sat Nov 7 02:00:17 PST 2009 11070200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=89.9 ms 11070200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=79.1 ms 11070200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=96.0 ms 11070200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=106 ms 11070200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=95.7 ms 11070200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11070200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 79.120/93.377/106.025/8.812 ms 11070200.ms:79.120 93.377 106.025 8.812 11070200.loss:0 11070230.ping:Sat Nov 7 02:30:17 PST 2009 11070230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11070230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11070230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11070230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 11070230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11070230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11070230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.392/39.876/48.573/4.423 ms 11070230.ms:36.392 39.876 48.573 4.423 11070230.loss:0 11070300.ping:Sat Nov 7 03:00:17 PST 2009 11070300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 11070300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11070300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11070300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11070300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11070300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.765/41.098/43.630/1.467 ms 11070300.ms:39.765 41.098 43.630 1.467 11070300.loss:0 11070330.ping:Sat Nov 7 03:30:16 PST 2009 11070330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11070330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=64.9 ms 11070330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 11070330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11070330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11070330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11070330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.858/41.317/64.953/11.837 ms 11070330.ms:34.858 41.317 64.953 11.837 11070330.loss:0 11070400.ping:Sat Nov 7 04:00:16 PST 2009 11070400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11070400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11070400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11070400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11070400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11070400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 11070400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.181/36.945/39.838/1.466 ms 11070400.ms:36.181 36.945 39.838 1.466 11070400.loss:0 11070430.ping:Sat Nov 7 04:30:16 PST 2009 11070430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.9 ms 11070430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11070430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11070430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11070430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.0 ms 11070430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11070430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.922/36.690/40.871/4.664 ms 11070430.ms:30.922 36.690 40.871 4.664 11070430.loss:0 11070500.ping:Sat Nov 7 05:00:16 PST 2009 11070500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11070500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11070500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11070500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11070500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11070500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.816/34.575/35.868/0.696 ms 11070500.ms:33.816 34.575 35.868 0.696 11070500.loss:0 11070530.ping:Sat Nov 7 05:30:16 PST 2009 11070530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=23.3 ms 11070530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.5 ms 11070530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11070530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.4 ms 11070530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11070530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.341/41.773/51.532/10.282 ms 11070530.ms:23.341 41.773 51.532 10.282 11070530.loss:0 11070600.ping:Sat Nov 7 06:00:14 PST 2009 11070600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11070600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=71.5 ms 11070600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11070600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11070600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=78.3 ms 11070600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11070600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.535/53.470/78.341/17.697 ms 11070600.ms:38.535 53.470 78.341 17.697 11070600.loss:0 11070630.ping:Sat Nov 7 06:30:16 PST 2009 11070630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.0 ms 11070630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 11070630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.5 ms 11070630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 11070630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 11070630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.585/31.958/35.787/4.623 ms 11070630.ms:25.585 31.958 35.787 4.623 11070630.loss:0 11070700.ping:Sat Nov 7 07:00:16 PST 2009 11070700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11070700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11070700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11070700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11070700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11070700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.539/37.582/39.266/1.240 ms 11070700.ms:36.539 37.582 39.266 1.240 11070700.loss:0 11070730.ping:Sat Nov 7 07:30:16 PST 2009 11070730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=513 ms 11070730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=311 ms 11070730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=202 ms 11070730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=221 ms 11070730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.7 ms 11070730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 51.703/260.264/513.019/151.529 ms 11070730.ms:51.703 260.264 513.019 151.529 11070730.loss:0 11070800.ping:Sat Nov 7 08:00:16 PST 2009 11070800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11070800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=71.6 ms 11070800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11070800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.5 ms 11070800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11070800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11070800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.598/43.751/71.643/14.592 ms 11070800.ms:28.598 43.751 71.643 14.592 11070800.loss:0 11070830.ping:Sat Nov 7 08:30:16 PST 2009 11070830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11070830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11070830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=63.3 ms 11070830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 11070830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11070830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11070830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.604/44.849/63.382/9.911 ms 11070830.ms:33.604 44.849 63.382 9.911 11070830.loss:0 11070900.ping:Sat Nov 7 09:00:16 PST 2009 11070900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11070900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11070900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 11070900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11070900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=70.7 ms 11070900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11070900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.683/47.149/70.711/11.802 ms 11070900.ms:40.683 47.149 70.711 11.802 11070900.loss:0 11070930.ping:Sat Nov 7 09:30:16 PST 2009 11070930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11070930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11070930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11070930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=107 ms 11070930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11070930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=27.3 ms 11070930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11070930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11070930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.317/48.894/107.261/29.414 ms 11070930.ms:27.317 48.894 107.261 29.414 11070930.loss:0 11071000.ping:Sat Nov 7 10:00:16 PST 2009 11071000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=60.4 ms 11071000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11071000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=72.5 ms 11071000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11071000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11071000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11071000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.482/51.960/72.539/12.466 ms 11071000.ms:41.482 51.960 72.539 12.466 11071000.loss:0 11071030.ping:Sat Nov 7 10:30:16 PST 2009 11071030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=129 ms 11071030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.6 ms 11071030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.4 ms 11071030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11071030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11071030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11071030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.600/54.972/129.525/37.580 ms 11071030.ms:30.600 54.972 129.525 37.580 11071030.loss:0 11071100.ping:Sat Nov 7 11:00:16 PST 2009 11071100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11071100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11071100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=26.4 ms 11071100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11071100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 11071100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11071100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.415/36.294/46.468/6.346 ms 11071100.ms:26.415 36.294 46.468 6.346 11071100.loss:0 11071130.ping:Sat Nov 7 11:30:16 PST 2009 11071130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11071130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=76.6 ms 11071130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11071130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11071130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 11071130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11071130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.395/46.410/76.695/15.672 ms 11071130.ms:33.395 46.410 76.695 15.672 11071130.loss:0 11071200.ping:Sat Nov 7 12:00:16 PST 2009 11071200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=66.0 ms 11071200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11071200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11071200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11071200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11071200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11071200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.003/43.488/66.082/11.306 ms 11071200.ms:37.003 43.488 66.082 11.306 11071200.loss:0 11071230.ping:Sat Nov 7 12:30:16 PST 2009 11071230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=84.6 ms 11071230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=95.6 ms 11071230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=93.3 ms 11071230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=93.0 ms 11071230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=83.9 ms 11071230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11071230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 83.979/90.143/95.698/4.869 ms 11071230.ms:83.979 90.143 95.698 4.869 11071230.loss:0 11071300.ping:Sat Nov 7 13:00:16 PST 2009 11071300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.6 ms 11071300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11071300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=81.9 ms 11071300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=91.9 ms 11071300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=82.7 ms 11071300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11071300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 81.989/90.498/102.193/7.520 ms 11071300.ms:81.989 90.498 102.193 7.520 11071300.loss:0 11071330.ping:Sat Nov 7 13:30:16 PST 2009 11071330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.4 ms 11071330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=90.9 ms 11071330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=91.0 ms 11071330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=86.9 ms 11071330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=106 ms 11071330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms 11071330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 86.904/93.647/106.824/6.847 ms 11071330.ms:86.904 93.647 106.824 6.847 11071330.loss:0 11071400.ping:Sat Nov 7 14:00:16 PST 2009 11071400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=91.0 ms 11071400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=90.1 ms 11071400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=90.1 ms 11071400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=90.1 ms 11071400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=90.1 ms 11071400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11071400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 90.118/90.340/91.084/0.532 ms 11071400.ms:90.118 90.340 91.084 0.532 11071400.loss:0 11071430.ping:Sat Nov 7 14:30:16 PST 2009 11071430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.5 ms 11071430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=81.0 ms 11071430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=90.7 ms 11071430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=91.0 ms 11071430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=81.1 ms 11071430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11071430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 81.040/87.287/92.509/5.108 ms 11071430.ms:81.040 87.287 92.509 5.108 11071430.loss:0 11071500.ping:Sat Nov 7 15:00:16 PST 2009 11071500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.7 ms 11071500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=92.1 ms 11071500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=82.1 ms 11071500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=91.8 ms 11071500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=81.8 ms 11071500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11071500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 81.816/88.337/93.748/5.247 ms 11071500.ms:81.816 88.337 93.748 5.247 11071500.loss:0 11071530.ping:Sat Nov 7 15:30:16 PST 2009 11071530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=96.6 ms 11071530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=88.1 ms 11071530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=88.6 ms 11071530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=98.8 ms 11071530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=88.7 ms 11071530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11071530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 88.130/92.205/98.869/4.597 ms 11071530.ms:88.130 92.205 98.869 4.597 11071530.loss:0 11071600.ping:Sat Nov 7 16:00:16 PST 2009 11071600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11071600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11071600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11071600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11071600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=27.4 ms 11071600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11071600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.417/35.942/38.803/4.282 ms 11071600.ms:27.417 35.942 38.803 4.282 11071600.loss:0 11071630.ping:Sat Nov 7 16:30:17 PST 2009 11071630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11071630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 11071630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11071630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11071630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=62.6 ms 11071630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11071630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.773/40.982/62.630/11.443 ms 11071630.ms:32.773 40.982 62.630 11.443 11071630.loss:0 11071700.ping:Sat Nov 7 17:00:11 PST 2009 11071700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11071700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11071700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11071700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11071700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11071700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11071700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.471/35.165/41.499/3.221 ms 11071700.ms:32.471 35.165 41.499 3.221 11071700.loss:0 11071730.ping:Sat Nov 7 17:30:16 PST 2009 11071730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11071730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11071730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11071730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=62.6 ms 11071730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11071730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11071730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.597/40.971/62.676/11.492 ms 11071730.ms:32.597 40.971 62.676 11.492 11071730.loss:0 11071800.ping:Sat Nov 7 18:00:17 PST 2009 11071800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11071800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11071800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11071800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11071800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11071800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11071800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.522/37.894/39.145/0.626 ms 11071800.ms:37.522 37.894 39.145 0.626 11071800.loss:0 11071830.ping:Sat Nov 7 18:30:17 PST 2009 11071830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11071830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11071830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11071830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11071830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=72.5 ms 11071830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11071830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.602/43.993/72.536/14.761 ms 11071830.ms:32.602 43.993 72.536 14.761 11071830.loss:0 11071900.ping:Sat Nov 7 19:00:16 PST 2009 11071900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11071900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11071900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11071900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11071900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11071900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11071900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.763/40.157/41.783/3.197 ms 11071900.ms:33.763 40.157 41.783 3.197 11071900.loss:0 11071930.ping:Sat Nov 7 19:30:16 PST 2009 11071930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11071930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11071930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11071930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11071930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11071930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11071930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11071930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11071930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.094/35.957/36.926/0.731 ms 11071930.ms:35.094 35.957 36.926 0.731 11071930.loss:0 11072000.ping:Sat Nov 7 20:00:16 PST 2009 11072000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11072000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.4 ms 11072000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=201 ms 11072000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=170 ms 11072000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11072000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=60.9 ms 11072000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11072000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11072000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.091/104.650/201.023/67.295 ms 11072000.ms:41.091 104.650 201.023 67.295 11072000.loss:0 11072030.ping:Sat Nov 7 20:30:16 PST 2009 11072030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11072030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.1 ms 11072030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.6 ms 11072030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=55.5 ms 11072030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11072030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11072030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11072030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11072030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.100/40.447/55.517/9.550 ms 11072030.ms:27.100 40.447 55.517 9.550 11072030.loss:0 11072100.ping:Sat Nov 7 21:00:16 PST 2009 11072100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11072100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=70.0 ms 11072100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11072100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11072100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11072100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=58.3 ms 11072100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11072100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11072100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.813/47.877/70.009/14.133 ms 11072100.ms:31.813 47.877 70.009 14.133 11072100.loss:0 11072130.ping:Sat Nov 7 21:30:17 PST 2009 11072130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11072130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11072130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11072130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.5 ms 11072130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=59.3 ms 11072130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11072130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11072130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11072130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.253/45.703/59.314/7.785 ms 11072130.ms:39.253 45.703 59.314 7.785 11072130.loss:0 11072200.ping:Sat Nov 7 22:00:16 PST 2009 11072200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11072200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11072200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11072200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11072200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11072200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11072200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11072200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11072200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.339/37.355/39.201/1.188 ms 11072200.ms:36.339 37.355 39.201 1.188 11072200.loss:0 11072230.ping:Sat Nov 7 22:30:16 PST 2009 11072230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11072230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11072230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=22.1 ms 11072230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 11072230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=63.3 ms 11072230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 11072230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11072230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11072230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.175/38.669/63.395/13.766 ms 11072230.ms:22.175 38.669 63.395 13.766 11072230.loss:0 11072300.ping:Sat Nov 7 23:00:16 PST 2009 11072300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11072300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11072300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 11072300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11072300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 11072300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11072300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11072300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11072300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.552/39.649/43.748/3.755 ms 11072300.ms:32.552 39.649 43.748 3.755 11072300.loss:0 11072330.ping:Sat Nov 7 23:30:16 PST 2009 11072330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11072330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11072330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.6 ms 11072330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=88.0 ms 11072330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11072330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11072330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11072330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11072330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.665/46.716/88.060/20.896 ms 11072330.ms:30.665 46.716 88.060 20.896 11072330.loss:0 11080000.ping:Sun Nov 8 00:00:13 PST 2009 11080000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11080000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11080000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11080000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=58.7 ms 11080000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11080000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.894/41.808/58.738/8.994 ms 11080000.ms:31.894 41.808 58.738 8.994 11080000.loss:0 11080030.ping:Sun Nov 8 00:30:16 PST 2009 11080030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=57.4 ms 11080030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 11080030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.6 ms 11080030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11080030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=95.6 ms 11080030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.620/50.051/95.646/25.046 ms 11080030.ms:25.620 50.051 95.646 25.046 11080030.loss:0 11080100.ping:Sun Nov 8 01:00:17 PST 2009 11080100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11080100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11080100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=66.6 ms 11080100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11080100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11080100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.408/42.977/66.642/11.855 ms 11080100.ms:36.408 42.977 66.642 11.855 11080100.loss:0 11080130.ping:Sun Nov 8 01:30:16 PST 2009 11080130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11080130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11080130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11080130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=27.8 ms 11080130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.6 ms 11080130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.819/38.166/47.644/6.318 ms 11080130.ms:27.819 38.166 47.644 6.318 11080130.loss:0 11080200.ping:Sun Nov 8 02:00:16 PST 2009 11080200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11080200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 11080200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11080200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11080200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11080200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11080200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.456/40.029/40.831/0.932 ms 11080200.ms:38.456 40.029 40.831 0.932 11080200.loss:0 11080230.ping:Sun Nov 8 02:30:16 PST 2009 11080230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11080230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11080230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11080230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11080230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11080230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11080230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.164/38.297/41.977/4.371 ms 11080230.ms:32.164 38.297 41.977 4.371 11080230.loss:0 11080300.ping:Sun Nov 8 03:00:16 PST 2009 11080300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.8 ms 11080300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=129 ms 11080300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=150 ms 11080300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.1 ms 11080300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11080300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11080300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.862/80.194/150.775/49.933 ms 11080300.ms:28.862 80.194 150.775 49.933 11080300.loss:0 11080330.ping:Sun Nov 8 03:30:16 PST 2009 11080330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11080330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=23.7 ms 11080330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11080330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=263 ms 11080330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 11080330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.714/79.899/263.616/92.075 ms 11080330.ms:23.714 79.899 263.616 92.075 11080330.loss:0 11080400.ping:Sun Nov 8 04:00:16 PST 2009 11080400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11080400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11080400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11080400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11080400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11080400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.546/37.597/39.697/1.255 ms 11080400.ms:36.546 37.597 39.697 1.255 11080400.loss:0 11080430.ping:Sun Nov 8 04:30:16 PST 2009 11080430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=118 ms 11080430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11080430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11080430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=115 ms 11080430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=145 ms 11080430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11080430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.530/90.317/145.838/45.784 ms 11080430.ms:35.530 90.317 145.838 45.784 11080430.loss:0 11080500.ping:Sun Nov 8 05:00:11 PST 2009 11080500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.9 ms 11080500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=63.5 ms 11080500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11080500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.9 ms 11080500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11080500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.129/47.945/63.565/8.604 ms 11080500.ms:41.129 47.945 63.565 8.604 11080500.loss:0 11080530.ping:Sun Nov 8 05:30:16 PST 2009 11080530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11080530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11080530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11080530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11080530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11080530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11080530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.787/38.322/40.022/0.855 ms 11080530.ms:37.787 38.322 40.022 0.855 11080530.loss:0 11080600.ping:Sun Nov 8 06:00:16 PST 2009 11080600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=148 ms 11080600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=109 ms 11080600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=138 ms 11080600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=109 ms 11080600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=78.7 ms 11080600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11080600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 78.716/116.864/148.451/24.718 ms 11080600.ms:78.716 116.864 148.451 24.718 11080600.loss:0 11080630.ping:Sun Nov 8 06:30:16 PST 2009 11080630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=95.5 ms 11080630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11080630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=147 ms 11080630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=137 ms 11080630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11080630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11080630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.296/90.913/147.240/47.316 ms 11080630.ms:36.296 90.913 147.240 47.316 11080630.loss:0 11080700.ping:Sun Nov 8 07:00:16 PST 2009 11080700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=64.9 ms 11080700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 11080700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11080700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 11080700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11080700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11080700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.336/45.308/64.951/10.769 ms 11080700.ms:35.336 45.308 64.951 10.769 11080700.loss:0 11080730.ping:Sun Nov 8 07:30:16 PST 2009 11080730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11080730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=125 ms 11080730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11080730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 11080730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=132 ms 11080730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.937/71.663/132.138/46.562 ms 11080730.ms:31.937 71.663 132.138 46.562 11080730.loss:0 11080800.ping:Sun Nov 8 08:00:16 PST 2009 11080800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11080800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=133 ms 11080800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=23.1 ms 11080800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=93.1 ms 11080800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11080800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11080800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.107/77.523/133.433/41.886 ms 11080800.ms:23.107 77.523 133.433 41.886 11080800.loss:0 11080830.ping:Sun Nov 8 08:30:16 PST 2009 11080830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=134 ms 11080830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 11080830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11080830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=52.0 ms 11080830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=182 ms 11080830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.188/86.566/182.334/60.868 ms 11080830.ms:32.188 86.566 182.334 60.868 11080830.loss:0 11080900.ping:Sun Nov 8 09:00:16 PST 2009 11080900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=200 ms 11080900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=89.4 ms 11080900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11080900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=129 ms 11080900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11080900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11080900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.178/99.552/200.934/60.880 ms 11080900.ms:39.178 99.552 200.934 60.880 11080900.loss:0 11080930.ping:Sun Nov 8 09:30:16 PST 2009 11080930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11080930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=22.0 ms 11080930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=22.2 ms 11080930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=302 ms 11080930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=72.4 ms 11080930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 11080930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11080930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11080930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.041/90.262/302.635/107.801 ms 11080930.ms:22.041 90.262 302.635 107.801 11080930.loss:0 11081000.ping:Sun Nov 8 10:00:16 PST 2009 11081000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11081000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 11081000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11081000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11081000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=322 ms 11081000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11081000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.443/92.989/322.789/114.970 ms 11081000.ms:32.443 92.989 322.789 114.970 11081000.loss:0 11081030.ping:Sun Nov 8 10:30:16 PST 2009 11081030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=203 ms 11081030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=174 ms 11081030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=172 ms 11081030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=212 ms 11081030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=212 ms 11081030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 172.208/195.084/212.272/17.873 ms 11081030.ms:172.208 195.084 212.272 17.873 11081030.loss:0 11081100.ping:Sun Nov 8 11:00:16 PST 2009 11081100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11081100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=158 ms 11081100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11081100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11081100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=146 ms 11081100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.545/83.320/158.802/56.863 ms 11081100.ms:36.545 83.320 158.802 56.863 11081100.loss:0 11081130.ping:Sun Nov 8 11:30:17 PST 2009 11081130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=69.5 ms 11081130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11081130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=67.9 ms 11081130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11081130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11081130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.846/50.286/69.586/15.105 ms 11081130.ms:37.846 50.286 69.586 15.105 11081130.loss:0 11081200.ping:Sun Nov 8 12:00:16 PST 2009 11081200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=56.4 ms 11081200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=207 ms 11081200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=114 ms 11081200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=274 ms 11081200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=144 ms 11081200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 56.412/159.689/274.821/75.422 ms 11081200.ms:56.412 159.689 274.821 75.422 11081200.loss:0 11081230.ping:Sun Nov 8 12:30:16 PST 2009 11081230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=585 ms 11081230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=569 ms 11081230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=579 ms 11081230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=579 ms 11081230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=599 ms 11081230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4766ms 11081230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 569.523/583.004/599.894/9.950 ms 11081230.ms:569.523 583.004 599.894 9.950 11081230.loss:0 11081300.ping:Sun Nov 8 13:00:16 PST 2009 11081300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11081300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11081300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 11081300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=72.0 ms 11081300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11081300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11081300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.910/45.086/72.006/13.901 ms 11081300.ms:33.910 45.086 72.006 13.901 11081300.loss:0 11081330.ping:Sun Nov 8 13:30:16 PST 2009 11081330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 11081330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11081330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11081330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11081330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11081330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11081330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.698/39.209/40.954/0.891 ms 11081330.ms:38.698 39.209 40.954 0.891 11081330.loss:0 11081400.ping:Sun Nov 8 14:00:16 PST 2009 11081400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=89.3 ms 11081400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11081400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=167 ms 11081400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=137 ms 11081400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=97.6 ms 11081400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.076/106.191/167.960/44.309 ms 11081400.ms:38.076 106.191 167.960 44.309 11081400.loss:0 11081430.ping:Sun Nov 8 14:30:16 PST 2009 11081430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11081430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11081430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 11081430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11081430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=62.7 ms 11081430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11081430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.296/41.958/62.757/11.065 ms 11081430.ms:32.296 41.958 62.757 11.065 11081430.loss:0 11081500.ping:Sun Nov 8 15:00:16 PST 2009 11081500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11081500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11081500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.3 ms 11081500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11081500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11081500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11081500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.385/42.922/51.386/4.323 ms 11081500.ms:39.385 42.922 51.386 4.323 11081500.loss:0 11081530.ping:Sun Nov 8 15:30:07 PST 2009 11081530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11081530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=29.0 ms 11081530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11081530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.0 ms 11081530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11081530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.005/35.502/41.061/5.320 ms 11081530.ms:29.005 35.502 41.061 5.320 11081530.loss:0 11081600.ping:Sun Nov 8 16:00:16 PST 2009 11081600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=193 ms 11081600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=192 ms 11081600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=192 ms 11081600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=182 ms 11081600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=191 ms 11081600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 182.102/190.337/193.488/4.175 ms 11081600.ms:182.102 190.337 193.488 4.175 11081600.loss:0 11081630.ping:Sun Nov 8 16:30:16 PST 2009 11081630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=98.3 ms 11081630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11081630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=66.5 ms 11081630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=77.1 ms 11081630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=96.9 ms 11081630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.539/75.080/98.307/22.713 ms 11081630.ms:36.539 75.080 98.307 22.713 11081630.loss:0 11081700.ping:Sun Nov 8 17:00:16 PST 2009 11081700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=83.7 ms 11081700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=92.2 ms 11081700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.1 ms 11081700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11081700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11081700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.637/70.421/92.219/23.389 ms 11081700.ms:41.637 70.421 92.219 23.389 11081700.loss:0 11081730.ping:Sun Nov 8 17:30:16 PST 2009 11081730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11081730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=69.1 ms 11081730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.1 ms 11081730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=100 ms 11081730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=80.6 ms 11081730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11081730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.473/67.837/100.695/22.011 ms 11081730.ms:38.473 67.837 100.695 22.011 11081730.loss:0 11081800.ping:Sun Nov 8 18:00:17 PST 2009 11081800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=86.6 ms 11081800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=86.6 ms 11081800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=86.5 ms 11081800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=286 ms 11081800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=86.2 ms 11081800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11081800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 86.210/126.429/286.080/79.826 ms 11081800.ms:86.210 126.429 286.080 79.826 11081800.loss:0 11081830.ping:Sun Nov 8 18:30:17 PST 2009 11081830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=54.7 ms 11081830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=83.6 ms 11081830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=73.2 ms 11081830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=93.4 ms 11081830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=93.4 ms 11081830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 54.700/79.712/93.495/14.570 ms 11081830.ms:54.700 79.712 93.495 14.570 11081830.loss:0 11081900.ping:Sun Nov 8 19:00:16 PST 2009 11081900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=178 ms 11081900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11081900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=66.9 ms 11081900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=96.4 ms 11081900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=66.2 ms 11081900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.446/88.825/178.086/48.495 ms 11081900.ms:36.446 88.825 178.086 48.495 11081900.loss:0 11081930.ping:Sun Nov 8 19:30:17 PST 2009 11081930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11081930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=26.7 ms 11081930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=25.1 ms 11081930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11081930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=55.1 ms 11081930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11081930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11081930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11081930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.197/35.497/55.112/10.653 ms 11081930.ms:25.197 35.497 55.112 10.653 11081930.loss:0 11082000.ping:Sun Nov 8 20:00:16 PST 2009 11082000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11082000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11082000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11082000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11082000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11082000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 11082000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11082000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11082000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.156/39.088/44.890/5.124 ms 11082000.ms:32.156 39.088 44.890 5.124 11082000.loss:0 11082030.ping:Sun Nov 8 20:30:17 PST 2009 11082030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11082030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.0 ms 11082030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11082030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=69.4 ms 11082030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.1 ms 11082030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11082030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11082030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11082030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.104/41.734/69.471/14.509 ms 11082030.ms:29.104 41.734 69.471 14.509 11082030.loss:0 11082100.ping:Sun Nov 8 21:00:16 PST 2009 11082100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11082100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11082100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11082100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 11082100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11082100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11082100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11082100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11082100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.299/36.755/42.517/4.653 ms 11082100.ms:32.299 36.755 42.517 4.653 11082100.loss:0 11082130.ping:Sun Nov 8 21:30:10 PST 2009 11082130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11082130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 11082130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11082130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11082130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 11082130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 11082130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11082130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11082130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.435/36.867/43.378/3.285 ms 11082130.ms:34.435 36.867 43.378 3.285 11082130.loss:0 11082200.ping:Sun Nov 8 22:00:16 PST 2009 11082200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11082200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11082200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=78.5 ms 11082200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11082200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.4 ms 11082200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11082200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11082200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11082200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.211/48.721/78.587/15.400 ms 11082200.ms:38.211 48.721 78.587 15.400 11082200.loss:0 11082230.ping:Sun Nov 8 22:30:17 PST 2009 11082230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11082230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11082230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11082230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11082230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.6 ms 11082230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11082230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11082230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11082230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.606/39.768/42.830/4.118 ms 11082230.ms:31.606 39.768 42.830 4.118 11082230.loss:0 11082300.ping:Sun Nov 8 23:00:16 PST 2009 11082300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11082300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=180 ms 11082300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11082300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11082300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11082300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11082300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11082300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11082300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.350/63.883/180.658/58.486 ms 11082300.ms:32.350 63.883 180.658 58.486 11082300.loss:0 11082330.ping:Sun Nov 8 23:30:16 PST 2009 11082330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11082330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.0 ms 11082330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.1 ms 11082330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11082330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11082330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11082330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11082330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11082330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.108/52.820/102.120/25.382 ms 11082330.ms:30.108 52.820 102.120 25.382 11082330.loss:0 11090000.ping:Mon Nov 9 00:00:17 PST 2009 11090000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=58.1 ms 11090000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11090000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11090000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=56.4 ms 11090000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11090000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.459/45.351/58.130/9.796 ms 11090000.ms:36.459 45.351 58.130 9.796 11090000.loss:0 11090030.ping:Mon Nov 9 00:30:13 PST 2009 11090030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 11090030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11090030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.7 ms 11090030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11090030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11090030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.710/42.067/51.860/6.411 ms 11090030.ms:31.710 42.067 51.860 6.411 11090030.loss:0 11090100.ping:Mon Nov 9 01:00:16 PST 2009 11090100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.3 ms 11090100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 11090100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11090100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=60.6 ms 11090100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11090100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.618/55.582/92.348/19.819 ms 11090100.ms:40.618 55.582 92.348 19.819 11090100.loss:0 11090130.ping:Mon Nov 9 01:30:16 PST 2009 11090130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11090130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11090130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11090130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 11090130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 11090130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms 11090130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.819/35.810/39.903/2.564 ms 11090130.ms:31.819 35.810 39.903 2.564 11090130.loss:0 11090200.ping:Mon Nov 9 02:00:16 PST 2009 11090200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=57.7 ms 11090200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11090200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=66.9 ms 11090200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11090200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11090200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11090200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.896/47.139/66.978/12.756 ms 11090200.ms:36.896 47.139 66.978 12.756 11090200.loss:0 11090230.ping:Mon Nov 9 02:30:16 PST 2009 11090230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11090230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 11090230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 11090230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11090230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11090230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11090230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.690/40.374/42.174/3.344 ms 11090230.ms:33.690 40.374 42.174 3.344 11090230.loss:0 11090300.ping:Mon Nov 9 03:00:16 PST 2009 11090300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11090300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11090300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11090300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 11090300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=72.9 ms 11090300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11090300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.659/46.197/72.954/13.867 ms 11090300.ms:32.659 46.197 72.954 13.867 11090300.loss:0 11090330.ping:Mon Nov 9 03:30:16 PST 2009 11090330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=139 ms 11090330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=197 ms 11090330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11090330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11090330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=378 ms 11090330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.798/158.357/378.023/125.781 ms 11090330.ms:37.798 158.357 378.023 125.781 11090330.loss:0 11090400.ping:Mon Nov 9 04:00:16 PST 2009 11090400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11090400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=151 ms 11090400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11090400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=121 ms 11090400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=251 ms 11090400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.173/119.380/251.269/80.238 ms 11090400.ms:32.173 119.380 251.269 80.238 11090400.loss:0 11090430.ping:Mon Nov 9 04:30:16 PST 2009 11090430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=68.1 ms 11090430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11090430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11090430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=26.0 ms 11090430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11090430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.091/41.079/68.122/14.207 ms 11090430.ms:26.091 41.079 68.122 14.207 11090430.loss:0 11090500.ping:Mon Nov 9 05:00:16 PST 2009 11090500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 11090500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11090500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11090500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11090500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11090500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11090500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.578/40.728/41.411/0.727 ms 11090500.ms:39.578 40.728 41.411 0.727 11090500.loss:0 11090530.ping:Mon Nov 9 05:30:09 PST 2009 11090530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11090530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11090530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11090530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=66.6 ms 11090530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11090530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.470/43.436/66.697/11.674 ms 11090530.ms:36.470 43.436 66.697 11.674 11090530.loss:0 11090600.ping:Mon Nov 9 06:00:16 PST 2009 11090600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.3 ms 11090600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11090600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11090600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11090600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11090600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.566/35.971/45.356/4.696 ms 11090600.ms:33.566 35.971 45.356 4.696 11090600.loss:0 11090630.ping:Mon Nov 9 06:30:16 PST 2009 11090630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=70.0 ms 11090630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 11090630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11090630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11090630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11090630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11090630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.792/47.622/70.034/11.229 ms 11090630.ms:40.792 47.622 70.034 11.229 11090630.loss:0 11090700.ping:Mon Nov 9 07:00:16 PST 2009 11090700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11090700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11090700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=55.8 ms 11090700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11090700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11090700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms 11090700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.958/44.472/55.876/7.977 ms 11090700.ms:35.958 44.472 55.876 7.977 11090700.loss:0 11090730.ping:Mon Nov 9 07:30:16 PST 2009 11090730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=54.3 ms 11090730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=22.6 ms 11090730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11090730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11090730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=72.5 ms 11090730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.639/45.005/72.544/17.341 ms 11090730.ms:22.639 45.005 72.544 17.341 11090730.loss:0 11090800.ping:Mon Nov 9 08:00:16 PST 2009 11090800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=51.5 ms 11090800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.8 ms 11090800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11090800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=129 ms 11090800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.4 ms 11090800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.729/64.071/129.818/33.134 ms 11090800.ms:39.729 64.071 129.818 33.134 11090800.loss:0 11090830.ping:Mon Nov 9 08:30:16 PST 2009 11090830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11090830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11090830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=24.6 ms 11090830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11090830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11090830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.645/33.060/36.788/4.294 ms 11090830.ms:24.645 33.060 36.788 4.294 11090830.loss:0 11090900.ping:Mon Nov 9 09:00:16 PST 2009 11090900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11090900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11090900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=63.4 ms 11090900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 11090900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=93.4 ms 11090900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11090900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.450/54.849/93.482/21.721 ms 11090900.ms:33.450 54.849 93.482 21.721 11090900.loss:0 11090930.ping:Mon Nov 9 09:30:17 PST 2009 11090930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11090930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.9 ms 11090930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=27.8 ms 11090930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=84.5 ms 11090930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=54.2 ms 11090930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=24.3 ms 11090930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11090930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11090930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.357/47.377/84.522/21.640 ms 11090930.ms:24.357 47.377 84.522 21.640 11090930.loss:0 11091000.ping:Mon Nov 9 10:00:16 PST 2009 11091000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11091000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11091000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11091000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11091000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.4 ms 11091000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.473/39.825/42.899/4.214 ms 11091000.ms:31.473 39.825 42.899 4.214 11091000.loss:0 11091030.ping:Mon Nov 9 10:30:16 PST 2009 11091030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=147 ms 11091030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=48.8 ms 11091030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 11091030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.4 ms 11091030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11091030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11091030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.321/67.409/147.836/40.377 ms 11091030.ms:40.321 67.409 147.836 40.377 11091030.loss:0 11091100.ping:Mon Nov 9 11:00:16 PST 2009 11091100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11091100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11091100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=22.9 ms 11091100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=82.8 ms 11091100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=113 ms 11091100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11091100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.972/60.376/113.090/32.865 ms 11091100.ms:22.972 60.376 113.090 32.865 11091100.loss:0 11091130.ping:Mon Nov 9 11:30:16 PST 2009 11091130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11091130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11091130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11091130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=47.7 ms 11091130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11091130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.852/40.326/47.786/3.810 ms 11091130.ms:37.852 40.326 47.786 3.810 11091130.loss:0 11091200.ping:Mon Nov 9 12:00:16 PST 2009 11091200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=48.7 ms 11091200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=77.0 ms 11091200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=76.8 ms 11091200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.6 ms 11091200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=67.0 ms 11091200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11091200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 46.646/63.252/77.063/13.241 ms 11091200.ms:46.646 63.252 77.063 13.241 11091200.loss:0 11091230.ping:Mon Nov 9 12:30:17 PST 2009 11091230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=51.4 ms 11091230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=52.6 ms 11091230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 11091230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 11091230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=64.6 ms 11091230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11091230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.419/51.162/64.632/7.752 ms 11091230.ms:43.419 51.162 64.632 7.752 11091230.loss:0 11091300.ping:Mon Nov 9 13:00:16 PST 2009 11091300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=62.2 ms 11091300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.0 ms 11091300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=144 ms 11091300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=54.5 ms 11091300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 11091300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11091300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.448/70.517/144.320/37.413 ms 11091300.ms:45.448 70.517 144.320 37.413 11091300.loss:0 11091330.ping:Mon Nov 9 13:30:16 PST 2009 11091330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=51.5 ms 11091330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=72.9 ms 11091330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11091330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11091330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=53.6 ms 11091330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11091330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.253/48.993/72.931/14.742 ms 11091330.ms:33.253 48.993 72.931 14.742 11091330.loss:0 11091400.ping:Mon Nov 9 14:00:16 PST 2009 11091400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 11091400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11091400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=22.5 ms 11091400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11091400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=72.2 ms 11091400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.570/53.384/102.570/29.728 ms 11091400.ms:22.570 53.384 102.570 29.728 11091400.loss:0 11091430.ping:Mon Nov 9 14:30:16 PST 2009 11091430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=76.8 ms 11091430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=65.5 ms 11091430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 11091430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.2 ms 11091430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11091430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.262/53.623/76.880/15.249 ms 11091430.ms:35.262 53.623 76.880 15.249 11091430.loss:0 11091500.ping:Mon Nov 9 15:00:16 PST 2009 11091500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 11091500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=76.6 ms 11091500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=56.1 ms 11091500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11091500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11091500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.063/46.627/76.604/17.620 ms 11091500.ms:28.063 46.627 76.604 17.620 11091500.loss:0 11091530.ping:Mon Nov 9 15:30:16 PST 2009 11091530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=79.3 ms 11091530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=77.5 ms 11091530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 11091530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=27.0 ms 11091530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11091530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.009/53.693/79.352/21.203 ms 11091530.ms:27.009 53.693 79.352 21.203 11091530.loss:0 11091600.ping:Mon Nov 9 16:00:16 PST 2009 11091600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=70.0 ms 11091600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=78.2 ms 11091600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=78.2 ms 11091600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=81.7 ms 11091600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=58.3 ms 11091600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 58.381/73.329/81.756/8.414 ms 11091600.ms:58.381 73.329 81.756 8.414 11091600.loss:0 11091630.ping:Mon Nov 9 16:30:16 PST 2009 11091630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11091630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11091630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11091630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=87.2 ms 11091630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11091630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.020/48.065/87.212/19.598 ms 11091630.ms:37.020 48.065 87.212 19.598 11091630.loss:0 11091700.ping:Mon Nov 9 17:00:17 PST 2009 11091700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11091700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=124 ms 11091700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=64.5 ms 11091700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11091700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 11091700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.443/60.667/124.102/33.481 ms 11091700.ms:34.443 60.667 124.102 33.481 11091700.loss:0 11091730.ping:Mon Nov 9 17:30:16 PST 2009 11091730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.7 ms 11091730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=71.7 ms 11091730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=152 ms 11091730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=143 ms 11091730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=174 ms 11091730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3996ms 11091730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.720/118.567/174.243/48.340 ms 11091730.ms:50.720 118.567 174.243 48.340 11091730.loss:0 11091800.ping:Mon Nov 9 18:00:17 PST 2009 11091800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=159 ms 11091800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=310 ms 11091800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=568 ms 11091800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=368 ms 11091800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=248 ms 11091800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 159.701/330.985/568.274/137.349 ms 11091800.ms:159.701 330.985 568.274 137.349 11091800.loss:0 11091830.ping:Mon Nov 9 18:30:16 PST 2009 11091830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=54.4 ms 11091830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=55.7 ms 11091830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=22.8 ms 11091830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11091830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.5 ms 11091830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.816/42.096/55.702/12.634 ms 11091830.ms:22.816 42.096 55.702 12.634 11091830.loss:0 11091900.ping:Mon Nov 9 19:00:17 PST 2009 11091900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11091900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11091900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11091900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.6 ms 11091900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.0 ms 11091900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11091900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.660/40.198/50.071/6.484 ms 11091900.ms:29.660 40.198 50.071 6.484 11091900.loss:0 11091930.ping:Mon Nov 9 19:30:16 PST 2009 11091930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11091930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11091930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11091930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 11091930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11091930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11091930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11091930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11091930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.690/40.109/48.566/4.308 ms 11091930.ms:36.690 40.109 48.566 4.308 11091930.loss:0 11092000.ping:Mon Nov 9 20:00:16 PST 2009 11092000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11092000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11092000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=26.1 ms 11092000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11092000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11092000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=55.9 ms 11092000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11092000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11092000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.164/38.423/55.923/9.673 ms 11092000.ms:26.164 38.423 55.923 9.673 11092000.loss:0 11092030.ping:Mon Nov 9 20:30:16 PST 2009 11092030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11092030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11092030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11092030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.6 ms 11092030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11092030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11092030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11092030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11092030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.670/37.006/40.601/4.246 ms 11092030.ms:28.670 37.006 40.601 4.246 11092030.loss:0 11092100.ping:Mon Nov 9 21:00:17 PST 2009 11092100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11092100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 11092100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11092100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.6 ms 11092100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11092100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.5 ms 11092100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11092100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11092100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.606/42.089/51.572/6.372 ms 11092100.ms:31.606 42.089 51.572 6.372 11092100.loss:0 11092130.ping:Mon Nov 9 21:30:16 PST 2009 11092130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11092130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11092130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11092130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11092130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.3 ms 11092130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11092130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11092130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11092130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.445/42.749/50.355/3.850 ms 11092130.ms:40.445 42.749 50.355 3.850 11092130.loss:0 11092200.ping:Mon Nov 9 22:00:16 PST 2009 11092200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11092200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11092200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11092200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11092200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11092200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11092200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11092200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11092200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.215/42.622/49.121/3.275 ms 11092200.ms:40.215 42.622 49.121 3.275 11092200.loss:0 11092230.ping:Mon Nov 9 22:30:16 PST 2009 11092230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11092230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.7 ms 11092230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 11092230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11092230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.2 ms 11092230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11092230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11092230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11092230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.764/41.091/50.251/5.945 ms 11092230.ms:31.764 41.091 50.251 5.945 11092230.loss:0 11092300.ping:Mon Nov 9 23:00:16 PST 2009 11092300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11092300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 11092300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11092300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11092300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11092300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=79.0 ms 11092300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11092300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11092300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.234/48.223/79.064/15.469 ms 11092300.ms:39.234 48.223 79.064 15.469 11092300.loss:0 11092330.ping:Mon Nov 9 23:30:16 PST 2009 11092330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11092330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11092330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11092330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11092330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=60.1 ms 11092330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11092330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11092330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11092330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.067/44.458/60.122/7.852 ms 11092330.ms:40.067 44.458 60.122 7.852 11092330.loss:0 11100000.ping:Tue Nov 10 00:00:16 PST 2009 11100000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=76.9 ms 11100000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11100000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11100000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11100000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11100000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11100000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.028/46.429/76.925/15.256 ms 11100000.ms:38.028 46.429 76.925 15.256 11100000.loss:0 11100030.ping:Tue Nov 10 00:30:16 PST 2009 11100030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=25.9 ms 11100030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11100030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11100030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.1 ms 11100030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=63.9 ms 11100030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.995/40.516/63.936/13.044 ms 11100030.ms:25.995 40.516 63.936 13.044 11100030.loss:0 11100100.ping:Tue Nov 10 01:00:16 PST 2009 11100100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11100100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11100100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.7 ms 11100100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=54.9 ms 11100100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11100100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11100100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.761/42.198/54.928/7.670 ms 11100100.ms:33.761 42.198 54.928 7.670 11100100.loss:0 11100130.ping:Tue Nov 10 01:30:16 PST 2009 11100130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11100130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11100130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.3 ms 11100130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11100130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.9 ms 11100130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11100130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.594/41.598/48.307/5.376 ms 11100130.ms:36.594 41.598 48.307 5.376 11100130.loss:0 11100200.ping:Tue Nov 10 02:00:16 PST 2009 11100200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 11100200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11100200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.3 ms 11100200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=77.4 ms 11100200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=147 ms 11100200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11100200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.352/64.806/147.346/44.778 ms 11100200.ms:28.352 64.806 147.346 44.778 11100200.loss:0 11100230.ping:Tue Nov 10 02:30:16 PST 2009 11100230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=53.0 ms 11100230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11100230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=72.2 ms 11100230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11100230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 11100230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.045/50.331/72.227/11.737 ms 11100230.ms:42.045 50.331 72.227 11.737 11100230.loss:0 11100300.ping:Tue Nov 10 03:00:16 PST 2009 11100300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11100300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11100300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11100300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11100300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11100300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.882/37.331/38.748/0.741 ms 11100300.ms:36.882 37.331 38.748 0.741 11100300.loss:0 11100330.ping:Tue Nov 10 03:30:16 PST 2009 11100330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11100330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11100330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11100330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.7 ms 11100330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11100330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.102/40.123/51.769/7.149 ms 11100330.ms:32.102 40.123 51.769 7.149 11100330.loss:0 11100400.ping:Tue Nov 10 04:00:16 PST 2009 11100400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11100400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.8 ms 11100400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11100400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.0 ms 11100400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.0 ms 11100400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11100400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.859/41.460/51.096/8.571 ms 11100400.ms:30.859 41.460 51.096 8.571 11100400.loss:0 11100430.ping:Tue Nov 10 04:30:16 PST 2009 11100430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.5 ms 11100430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.7 ms 11100430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11100430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=58.2 ms 11100430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11100430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4056ms 11100430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.880/45.147/58.217/7.399 ms 11100430.ms:36.880 45.147 58.217 7.399 11100430.loss:0 11100500.ping:Tue Nov 10 05:00:16 PST 2009 11100500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11100500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11100500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=141 ms 11100500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=129 ms 11100500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=208 ms 11100500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11100500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.817/110.747/208.845/66.024 ms 11100500.ms:36.817 110.747 208.845 66.024 11100500.loss:0 11100530.ping:Tue Nov 10 05:30:16 PST 2009 11100530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11100530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=65.9 ms 11100530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11100530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.6 ms 11100530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=55.4 ms 11100530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.535/48.047/65.969/11.389 ms 11100530.ms:35.535 48.047 65.969 11.389 11100530.loss:0 11100600.ping:Tue Nov 10 06:00:16 PST 2009 11100600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11100600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11100600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=70.5 ms 11100600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11100600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11100600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.573/46.935/70.512/11.809 ms 11100600.ms:40.573 46.935 70.512 11.809 11100600.loss:0 11100630.ping:Tue Nov 10 06:30:16 PST 2009 11100630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 11100630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 11100630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11100630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=63.7 ms 11100630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=53.2 ms 11100630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.401/43.796/63.743/12.472 ms 11100630.ms:33.401 43.796 63.743 12.472 11100630.loss:0 11100700.ping:Tue Nov 10 07:00:16 PST 2009 11100700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=82.2 ms 11100700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11100700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11100700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 11100700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11100700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11100700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.233/43.649/82.286/19.323 ms 11100700.ms:33.233 43.649 82.286 19.323 11100700.loss:0 11100730.ping:Tue Nov 10 07:30:16 PST 2009 11100730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=61.0 ms 11100730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 11100730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11100730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=63.4 ms 11100730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=23.4 ms 11100730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11100730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.467/44.570/63.478/15.725 ms 11100730.ms:23.467 44.570 63.478 15.725 11100730.loss:0 11100800.ping:Tue Nov 10 08:00:16 PST 2009 11100800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=84.0 ms 11100800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=65.1 ms 11100800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11100800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=56.6 ms 11100800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11100800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11100800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.942/55.648/84.090/18.213 ms 11100800.ms:35.942 55.648 84.090 18.213 11100800.loss:0 11100830.ping:Tue Nov 10 08:30:16 PST 2009 11100830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=58.9 ms 11100830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=27.3 ms 11100830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.3 ms 11100830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=27.3 ms 11100830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=27.2 ms 11100830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.287/37.643/58.950/13.185 ms 11100830.ms:27.287 37.643 58.950 13.185 11100830.loss:0 11100900.ping:Tue Nov 10 09:00:16 PST 2009 11100900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11100900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11100900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11100900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11100900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.0 ms 11100900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.762/40.318/48.024/3.912 ms 11100900.ms:37.762 40.318 48.024 3.912 11100900.loss:0 11100930.ping:Tue Nov 10 09:30:16 PST 2009 11100930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11100930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=230 ms 11100930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=28.7 ms 11100930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=58.9 ms 11100930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.7 ms 11100930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=59.1 ms 11100930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11100930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11100930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.728/81.502/230.849/75.857 ms 11100930.ms:28.728 81.502 230.849 75.857 11100930.loss:0 11101000.ping:Tue Nov 10 10:00:16 PST 2009 11101000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=63.2 ms 11101000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11101000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.1 ms 11101000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=71.6 ms 11101000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=72.0 ms 11101000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.812/58.195/72.046/15.042 ms 11101000.ms:31.812 58.195 72.046 15.042 11101000.loss:0 11101030.ping:Tue Nov 10 10:30:16 PST 2009 11101030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=66.4 ms 11101030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=97.5 ms 11101030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=118 ms 11101030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11101030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=78.7 ms 11101030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11101030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.561/79.973/118.524/27.185 ms 11101030.ms:38.561 79.973 118.524 27.185 11101030.loss:0 11101100.ping:Tue Nov 10 11:00:16 PST 2009 11101100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11101100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.7 ms 11101100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 11101100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=74.9 ms 11101100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 11101100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.878/49.950/74.974/13.035 ms 11101100.ms:36.878 49.950 74.974 13.035 11101100.loss:0 11101130.ping:Tue Nov 10 11:30:16 PST 2009 11101130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=247 ms 11101130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=58.8 ms 11101130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=136 ms 11101130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=96.1 ms 11101130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.7 ms 11101130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.724/117.017/247.957/72.702 ms 11101130.ms:45.724 117.017 247.957 72.702 11101130.loss:0 11101200.ping:Tue Nov 10 12:00:16 PST 2009 11101200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 11101200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 11101200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11101200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11101200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 11101200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.984/35.410/43.134/3.923 ms 11101200.ms:32.984 35.410 43.134 3.923 11101200.loss:0 11101230.ping:Tue Nov 10 12:30:16 PST 2009 11101230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=385 ms 11101230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=335 ms 11101230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=345 ms 11101230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=362 ms 11101230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=355 ms 11101230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 335.416/356.794/385.027/16.867 ms 11101230.ms:335.416 356.794 385.027 16.867 11101230.loss:0 11101300.ping:Tue Nov 10 13:00:16 PST 2009 11101300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=224 ms 11101300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=279 ms 11101300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=173 ms 11101300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=252 ms 11101300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=222 ms 11101300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 173.256/230.574/279.212/35.351 ms 11101300.ms:173.256 230.574 279.212 35.351 11101300.loss:0 11101330.ping:Tue Nov 10 13:30:16 PST 2009 11101330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=546 ms 11101330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=541 ms 11101330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=559 ms 11101330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=452 ms 11101330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=503 ms 11101330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4095ms 11101330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 452.579/520.819/559.692/38.949 ms 11101330.ms:452.579 520.819 559.692 38.949 11101330.loss:0 11101400.ping:Tue Nov 10 14:00:16 PST 2009 11101400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=428 ms 11101400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=466 ms 11101400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=448 ms 11101400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=418 ms 11101400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=457 ms 11101400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 418.803/444.082/466.944/17.919 ms 11101400.ms:418.803 444.082 466.944 17.919 11101400.loss:0 11101430.ping:Tue Nov 10 14:30:16 PST 2009 11101430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=577 ms 11101430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=520 ms 11101430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=559 ms 11101430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=569 ms 11101430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=491 ms 11101430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4685ms 11101430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 491.307/543.772/577.892/32.688 ms 11101430.ms:491.307 543.772 577.892 32.688 11101430.loss:0 11101500.ping:Tue Nov 10 15:00:16 PST 2009 11101500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=355 ms 11101500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=354 ms 11101500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=364 ms 11101500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=404 ms 11101500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=344 ms 11101500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 344.458/364.750/404.462/20.890 ms 11101500.ms:344.458 364.750 404.462 20.890 11101500.loss:0 11101530.ping:Tue Nov 10 15:30:16 PST 2009 11101530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=359 ms 11101530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=349 ms 11101530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=412 ms 11101530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=491 ms 11101530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=553 ms 11101530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11101530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 349.899/433.518/553.932/78.378 ms 11101530.ms:349.899 433.518 553.932 78.378 11101530.loss:0 11101600.ping:Tue Nov 10 16:00:17 PST 2009 11101600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=533 ms 11101600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=519 ms 11101600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=427 ms 11101600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=166 ms 11101600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=183 ms 11101600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4069ms 11101600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 166.193/366.139/533.602/160.296 ms 11101600.ms:166.193 366.139 533.602 160.296 11101600.loss:0 11101630.ping:Tue Nov 10 16:30:17 PST 2009 11101630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11101630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=78.6 ms 11101630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=58.6 ms 11101630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11101630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.4 ms 11101630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.746/52.968/78.671/14.677 ms 11101630.ms:38.746 52.968 78.671 14.677 11101630.loss:0 11101700.ping:Tue Nov 10 17:00:08 PST 2009 11101700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11101700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11101700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11101700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11101700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.2 ms 11101700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.085/42.477/50.293/3.953 ms 11101700.ms:40.085 42.477 50.293 3.953 11101700.loss:0 11101730.ping:Tue Nov 10 17:30:17 PST 2009 11101730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11101730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=81.7 ms 11101730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11101730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11101730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=52.6 ms 11101730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11101730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.059/52.147/81.747/15.359 ms 11101730.ms:41.059 52.147 81.747 15.359 11101730.loss:0 11101800.ping:Tue Nov 10 18:00:17 PST 2009 11101800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=73.2 ms 11101800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11101800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11101800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.6 ms 11101800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11101800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.717/50.041/73.254/12.221 ms 11101800.ms:41.717 50.041 73.254 12.221 11101800.loss:0 11101830.ping:Tue Nov 10 18:30:12 PST 2009 11101830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11101830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11101830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11101830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=61.9 ms 11101830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=60.8 ms 11101830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.150/49.857/61.935/9.449 ms 11101830.ms:41.150 49.857 61.935 9.449 11101830.loss:0 11101900.ping:Tue Nov 10 19:00:16 PST 2009 11101900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=77.3 ms 11101900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=97.2 ms 11101900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=85.7 ms 11101900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=85.8 ms 11101900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=135 ms 11101900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 77.378/96.405/135.856/20.712 ms 11101900.ms:77.378 96.405 135.856 20.712 11101900.loss:0 11101930.ping:Tue Nov 10 19:30:16 PST 2009 11101930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11101930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=64.5 ms 11101930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11101930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11101930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=52.8 ms 11101930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11101930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11101930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11101930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.469/44.935/64.524/12.337 ms 11101930.ms:32.469 44.935 64.524 12.337 11101930.loss:0 11102000.ping:Tue Nov 10 20:00:08 PST 2009 11102000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11102000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 11102000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11102000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 11102000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=72.4 ms 11102000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=72.0 ms 11102000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11102000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11102000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.937/50.354/72.403/18.168 ms 11102000.ms:31.937 50.354 72.403 18.168 11102000.loss:0 11102030.ping:Tue Nov 10 20:30:16 PST 2009 11102030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11102030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=749 ms 11102030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=758 ms 11102030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=766 ms 11102030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=758 ms 11102030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=767 ms 11102030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11102030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4501ms 11102030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 749.024/760.084/767.639/6.823 ms 11102030.ms:749.024 760.084 767.639 6.823 11102030.loss:0 11102100.ping:Tue Nov 10 21:00:16 PST 2009 11102100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11102100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=485 ms 11102100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=486 ms 11102100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=474 ms 11102100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=474 ms 11102100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=504 ms 11102100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11102100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11102100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 474.210/485.073/504.057/10.951 ms 11102100.ms:474.210 485.073 504.057 10.951 11102100.loss:0 11102130.ping:Tue Nov 10 21:30:17 PST 2009 11102130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11102130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=924 ms 11102130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=899 ms 11102130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=861 ms 11102130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=890 ms 11102130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=871 ms 11102130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11102130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4873ms 11102130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 861.223/889.629/924.578/22.186 ms 11102130.ms:861.223 889.629 924.578 22.186 11102130.loss:0 11102200.ping:Tue Nov 10 22:00:16 PST 2009 11102200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11102200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=526 ms 11102200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=499 ms 11102200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=446 ms 11102200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=508 ms 11102200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=536 ms 11102200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11102200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4049ms 11102200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 446.333/503.467/536.381/31.317 ms 11102200.ms:446.333 503.467 536.381 31.317 11102200.loss:0 11102230.ping:Tue Nov 10 22:30:16 PST 2009 11102230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11102230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=180 ms 11102230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=345 ms 11102230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=315 ms 11102230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=338 ms 11102230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=564 ms 11102230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11102230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11102230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 180.045/348.901/564.787/123.553 ms 11102230.ms:180.045 348.901 564.787 123.553 11102230.loss:0 11102300.ping:Tue Nov 10 23:00:16 PST 2009 11102300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11102300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=425 ms 11102300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=477 ms 11102300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=456 ms 11102300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=446 ms 11102300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=466 ms 11102300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11102300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11102300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 425.806/454.499/477.721/17.735 ms 11102300.ms:425.806 454.499 477.721 17.735 11102300.loss:0 11102330.ping:Tue Nov 10 23:30:16 PST 2009 11102330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11102330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=80.5 ms 11102330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11102330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11102330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11102330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11102330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11102330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11102330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.776/47.214/80.542/16.665 ms 11102330.ms:38.776 47.214 80.542 16.665 11102330.loss:0 11110000.ping:Wed Nov 11 00:00:17 PST 2009 11110000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 11110000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=71.6 ms 11110000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=61.6 ms 11110000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=111 ms 11110000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=212 ms 11110000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.182/98.022/212.023/62.299 ms 11110000.ms:33.182 98.022 212.023 62.299 11110000.loss:0 11110030.ping:Wed Nov 11 00:30:16 PST 2009 11110030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.5 ms 11110030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11110030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11110030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11110030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.9 ms 11110030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.586/43.366/49.103/7.473 ms 11110030.ms:30.586 43.366 49.103 7.473 11110030.loss:0 11110100.ping:Wed Nov 11 01:00:16 PST 2009 11110100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=373 ms 11110100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11110100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11110100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11110100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=201 ms 11110100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11110100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.418/138.759/373.769/133.198 ms 11110100.ms:39.418 138.759 373.769 133.198 11110100.loss:0 11110130.ping:Wed Nov 11 01:30:16 PST 2009 11110130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=268 ms 11110130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11110130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11110130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11110130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11110130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.417/83.031/268.288/92.628 ms 11110130.ms:36.417 83.031 268.288 92.628 11110130.loss:0 11110200.ping:Wed Nov 11 02:00:16 PST 2009 11110200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=115 ms 11110200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=173 ms 11110200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=163 ms 11110200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=183 ms 11110200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 11110200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.317/135.896/183.636/51.881 ms 11110200.ms:43.317 135.896 183.636 51.881 11110200.loss:0 11110230.ping:Wed Nov 11 02:30:16 PST 2009 11110230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11110230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11110230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11110230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=62.5 ms 11110230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 11110230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.594/42.981/62.510/10.670 ms 11110230.ms:32.594 42.981 62.510 10.670 11110230.loss:0 11110300.ping:Wed Nov 11 03:00:16 PST 2009 11110300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11110300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11110300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11110300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11110300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11110300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.279/35.773/37.360/0.831 ms 11110300.ms:35.279 35.773 37.360 0.831 11110300.loss:0 11110330.ping:Wed Nov 11 03:30:16 PST 2009 11110330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11110330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11110330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11110330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=152 ms 11110330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11110330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.101/56.678/152.406/47.868 ms 11110330.ms:32.101 56.678 152.406 47.868 11110330.loss:0 11110400.ping:Wed Nov 11 04:00:16 PST 2009 11110400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=99.3 ms 11110400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.9 ms 11110400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 11110400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=181 ms 11110400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11110400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11110400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.915/82.562/181.173/53.838 ms 11110400.ms:40.915 82.562 181.173 53.838 11110400.loss:0 11110430.ping:Wed Nov 11 04:30:16 PST 2009 11110430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=91.7 ms 11110430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=202 ms 11110430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=260 ms 11110430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=140 ms 11110430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=29.8 ms 11110430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.873/145.004/260.263/80.916 ms 11110430.ms:29.873 145.004 260.263 80.916 11110430.loss:0 11110500.ping:Wed Nov 11 05:00:16 PST 2009 11110500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11110500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=48.8 ms 11110500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11110500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.9 ms 11110500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=46.8 ms 11110500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11110500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.966/44.398/48.847/4.062 ms 11110500.ms:37.966 44.398 48.847 4.062 11110500.loss:0 11110530.ping:Wed Nov 11 05:30:16 PST 2009 11110530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11110530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=60.4 ms 11110530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=81.6 ms 11110530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11110530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11110530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11110530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.818/55.141/81.602/15.159 ms 11110530.ms:39.818 55.141 81.602 15.159 11110530.loss:0 11110600.ping:Wed Nov 11 06:00:16 PST 2009 11110600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=182 ms 11110600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=221 ms 11110600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11110600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=30.7 ms 11110600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11110600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.717/103.230/221.227/81.608 ms 11110600.ms:30.717 103.230 221.227 81.608 11110600.loss:0 11110630.ping:Wed Nov 11 06:30:16 PST 2009 11110630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=51.6 ms 11110630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.8 ms 11110630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11110630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11110630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11110630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.743/44.260/51.668/5.349 ms 11110630.ms:39.743 44.260 51.668 5.349 11110630.loss:0 11110700.ping:Wed Nov 11 07:00:16 PST 2009 11110700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11110700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11110700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.2 ms 11110700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11110700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=118 ms 11110700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11110700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.426/55.866/118.466/31.581 ms 11110700.ms:36.426 55.866 118.466 31.581 11110700.loss:0 11110730.ping:Wed Nov 11 07:30:17 PST 2009 11110730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11110730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11110730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11110730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11110730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11110730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.266/39.925/41.696/3.330 ms 11110730.ms:33.266 39.925 41.696 3.330 11110730.loss:0 11110800.ping:Wed Nov 11 08:00:16 PST 2009 11110800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11110800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.3 ms 11110800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=218 ms 11110800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=269 ms 11110800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.3 ms 11110800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.334/121.666/269.760/101.410 ms 11110800.ms:31.334 121.666 269.760 101.410 11110800.loss:0 11110830.ping:Wed Nov 11 08:30:09 PST 2009 11110830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=123 ms 11110830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11110830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11110830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11110830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=61.6 ms 11110830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.829/62.256/123.711/31.662 ms 11110830.ms:41.829 62.256 123.711 31.662 11110830.loss:0 11110900.ping:Wed Nov 11 09:00:16 PST 2009 11110900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=123 ms 11110900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=154 ms 11110900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11110900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=92.2 ms 11110900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11110900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.307/91.150/154.850/44.453 ms 11110900.ms:42.307 91.150 154.850 44.453 11110900.loss:0 11110930.ping:Wed Nov 11 09:30:16 PST 2009 11110930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11110930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11110930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11110930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11110930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11110930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.1 ms 11110930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11110930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11110930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.374/39.607/47.197/3.831 ms 11110930.ms:37.374 39.607 47.197 3.831 11110930.loss:0 11111000.ping:Wed Nov 11 10:00:16 PST 2009 11111000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11111000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=52.5 ms 11111000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11111000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11111000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=62.0 ms 11111000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.752/58.598/102.254/23.812 ms 11111000.ms:33.752 58.598 102.254 23.812 11111000.loss:0 11111030.ping:Wed Nov 11 10:30:16 PST 2009 11111030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11111030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11111030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.0 ms 11111030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11111030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11111030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11111030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.690/41.135/49.031/3.966 ms 11111030.ms:38.690 41.135 49.031 3.966 11111030.loss:0 11111100.ping:Wed Nov 11 11:00:16 PST 2009 11111100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.7 ms 11111100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.0 ms 11111100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11111100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 11111100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=73.8 ms 11111100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.997/48.984/73.887/13.287 ms 11111100.ms:33.997 48.984 73.887 13.287 11111100.loss:0 11111130.ping:Wed Nov 11 11:30:16 PST 2009 11111130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=48.2 ms 11111130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.9 ms 11111130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.9 ms 11111130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=78.2 ms 11111130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=166 ms 11111130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11111130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 46.935/77.440/166.776/46.246 ms 11111130.ms:46.935 77.440 166.776 46.246 11111130.loss:0 11111200.ping:Wed Nov 11 12:00:17 PST 2009 11111200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=91.2 ms 11111200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=52.0 ms 11111200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.0 ms 11111200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=52.2 ms 11111200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11111200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11111200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.084/53.929/91.229/20.077 ms 11111200.ms:32.084 53.929 91.229 20.077 11111200.loss:0 11111230.ping:Wed Nov 11 12:30:16 PST 2009 11111230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11111230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=63.3 ms 11111230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 11111230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.7 ms 11111230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=60.5 ms 11111230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.790/51.539/63.335/9.191 ms 11111230.ms:40.790 51.539 63.335 9.191 11111230.loss:0 11111300.ping:Wed Nov 11 13:00:17 PST 2009 11111300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=57.1 ms 11111300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=25.6 ms 11111300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.7 ms 11111300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.1 ms 11111300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 11111300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.640/44.230/57.185/10.248 ms 11111300.ms:25.640 44.230 57.185 10.248 11111300.loss:0 11111330.ping:Wed Nov 11 13:30:16 PST 2009 11111330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.2 ms 11111330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=91.1 ms 11111330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 11111330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.4 ms 11111330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.3 ms 11111330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 48.305/57.937/91.181/16.663 ms 11111330.ms:48.305 57.937 91.181 16.663 11111330.loss:0 11111400.ping:Wed Nov 11 14:00:17 PST 2009 11111400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 11111400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.3 ms 11111400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=53.2 ms 11111400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11111400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=53.1 ms 11111400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.383/48.427/53.202/5.153 ms 11111400.ms:41.383 48.427 53.202 5.153 11111400.loss:0 11111430.ping:Wed Nov 11 14:30:17 PST 2009 11111430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11111430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11111430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11111430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11111430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11111430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.353/35.220/36.570/1.003 ms 11111430.ms:34.353 35.220 36.570 1.003 11111430.loss:0 11111500.ping:Wed Nov 11 15:00:16 PST 2009 11111500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11111500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=56.1 ms 11111500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11111500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=69.0 ms 11111500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.1 ms 11111500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11111500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.200/48.915/69.082/12.587 ms 11111500.ms:35.200 48.915 69.082 12.587 11111500.loss:0 11111530.ping:Wed Nov 11 15:30:16 PST 2009 11111530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=70.5 ms 11111530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=66.1 ms 11111530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=56.0 ms 11111530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.3 ms 11111530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=86.2 ms 11111530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 46.332/65.058/86.288/13.527 ms 11111530.ms:46.332 65.058 86.288 13.527 11111530.loss:0 11111600.ping:Wed Nov 11 16:00:17 PST 2009 11111600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.8 ms 11111600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11111600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.2 ms 11111600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11111600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=108 ms 11111600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.108/57.490/108.984/26.200 ms 11111600.ms:39.108 57.490 108.984 26.200 11111600.loss:0 11111630.ping:Wed Nov 11 16:30:16 PST 2009 11111630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11111630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11111630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11111630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11111630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11111630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.811/34.187/35.359/0.611 ms 11111630.ms:33.811 34.187 35.359 0.611 11111630.loss:0 11111700.ping:Wed Nov 11 17:00:17 PST 2009 11111700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=48.7 ms 11111700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=76.7 ms 11111700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.9 ms 11111700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=76.5 ms 11111700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=77.0 ms 11111700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 46.991/65.213/77.027/14.169 ms 11111700.ms:46.991 65.213 77.027 14.169 11111700.loss:0 11111730.ping:Wed Nov 11 17:30:16 PST 2009 11111730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=73.5 ms 11111730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=64.6 ms 11111730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=75.7 ms 11111730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=71.5 ms 11111730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=54.5 ms 11111730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 54.509/68.005/75.798/7.702 ms 11111730.ms:54.509 68.005 75.798 7.702 11111730.loss:0 11111800.ping:Wed Nov 11 18:00:16 PST 2009 11111800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11111800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11111800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11111800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.9 ms 11111800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11111800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11111800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.487/37.221/42.944/4.750 ms 11111800.ms:32.487 37.221 42.944 4.750 11111800.loss:0 11111830.ping:Wed Nov 11 18:30:16 PST 2009 11111830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11111830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11111830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.0 ms 11111830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11111830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=81.6 ms 11111830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11111830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.060/46.726/81.698/17.869 ms 11111830.ms:31.060 46.726 81.698 17.869 11111830.loss:0 11111900.ping:Wed Nov 11 19:00:17 PST 2009 11111900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=538 ms 11111900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=371 ms 11111900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=406 ms 11111900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=297 ms 11111900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=216 ms 11111900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4021ms 11111900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 216.538/365.957/538.059/108.003 ms 11111900.ms:216.538 365.957 538.059 108.003 11111900.loss:0 11111930.ping:Wed Nov 11 19:30:16 PST 2009 11111930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11111930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.9 ms 11111930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11111930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11111930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11111930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.4 ms 11111930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11111930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11111930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.470/39.739/42.931/4.182 ms 11111930.ms:31.470 39.739 42.931 4.182 11111930.loss:0 11112000.ping:Wed Nov 11 20:00:16 PST 2009 11112000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11112000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11112000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11112000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11112000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11112000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.1 ms 11112000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11112000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11112000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.855/40.574/50.142/5.798 ms 11112000.ms:31.855 40.574 50.142 5.798 11112000.loss:0 11112030.ping:Wed Nov 11 20:30:16 PST 2009 11112030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11112030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11112030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11112030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.1 ms 11112030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11112030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11112030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11112030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11112030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.013/39.934/47.107/3.734 ms 11112030.ms:37.013 39.934 47.107 3.734 11112030.loss:0 11112100.ping:Wed Nov 11 21:00:17 PST 2009 11112100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11112100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11112100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=60.7 ms 11112100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11112100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=22.2 ms 11112100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11112100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11112100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11112100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.217/39.245/60.709/12.742 ms 11112100.ms:22.217 39.245 60.709 12.742 11112100.loss:0 11112130.ping:Wed Nov 11 21:30:16 PST 2009 11112130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11112130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=446 ms 11112130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=358 ms 11112130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=427 ms 11112130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=407 ms 11112130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=417 ms 11112130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11112130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4009ms 11112130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 358.712/411.491/446.482/29.391 ms 11112130.ms:358.712 411.491 446.482 29.391 11112130.loss:0 11112200.ping:Wed Nov 11 22:00:16 PST 2009 11112200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11112200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.1 ms 11112200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=68.2 ms 11112200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11112200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11112200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11112200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11112200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11112200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.190/43.017/68.202/13.526 ms 11112200.ms:27.190 43.017 68.202 13.526 11112200.loss:0 11112230.ping:Wed Nov 11 22:30:16 PST 2009 11112230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11112230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=72.7 ms 11112230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 11112230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11112230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11112230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11112230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11112230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11112230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.585/47.736/72.761/12.565 ms 11112230.ms:40.585 47.736 72.761 12.565 11112230.loss:0 11112300.ping:Wed Nov 11 23:00:16 PST 2009 11112300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11112300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11112300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11112300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11112300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11112300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11112300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11112300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11112300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.159/40.778/41.753/0.990 ms 11112300.ms:39.159 40.778 41.753 0.990 11112300.loss:0 11112330.ping:Wed Nov 11 23:30:16 PST 2009 11112330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11112330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11112330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11112330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11112330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11112330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11112330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11112330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11112330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.413/50.903/102.705/26.220 ms 11112330.ms:32.413 50.903 102.705 26.220 11112330.loss:0 11120000.ping:Thu Nov 12 00:00:17 PST 2009 11120000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11120000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11120000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11120000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11120000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=141 ms 11120000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.576/59.627/141.257/40.960 ms 11120000.ms:32.576 59.627 141.257 40.960 11120000.loss:0 11120030.ping:Thu Nov 12 00:30:12 PST 2009 11120030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11120030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11120030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11120030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=110 ms 11120030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11120030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.447/54.930/110.731/27.910 ms 11120030.ms:40.447 54.930 110.731 27.910 11120030.loss:0 11120100.ping:Thu Nov 12 01:00:16 PST 2009 11120100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11120100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=207 ms 11120100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11120100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=57.4 ms 11120100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=187 ms 11120100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.841/105.831/207.617/75.334 ms 11120100.ms:37.841 105.831 207.617 75.334 11120100.loss:0 11120130.ping:Thu Nov 12 01:30:16 PST 2009 11120130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11120130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11120130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11120130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 11120130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11120130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11120130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.774/38.594/42.596/4.722 ms 11120130.ms:32.774 38.594 42.596 4.722 11120130.loss:0 11120200.ping:Thu Nov 12 02:00:16 PST 2009 11120200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11120200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=157 ms 11120200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=157 ms 11120200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11120200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11120200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11120200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.945/85.200/157.542/59.041 ms 11120200.ms:36.945 85.200 157.542 59.041 11120200.loss:0 11120230.ping:Thu Nov 12 02:30:16 PST 2009 11120230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11120230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=152 ms 11120230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11120230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11120230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=27.9 ms 11120230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 11120230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.901/58.782/152.594/47.169 ms 11120230.ms:27.901 58.782 152.594 47.169 11120230.loss:0 11120300.ping:Thu Nov 12 03:00:16 PST 2009 11120300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11120300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=211 ms 11120300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.8 ms 11120300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=198 ms 11120300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11120300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.933/108.627/211.811/79.227 ms 11120300.ms:38.933 108.627 211.811 79.227 11120300.loss:0 11120330.ping:Thu Nov 12 03:30:16 PST 2009 11120330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11120330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=52.0 ms 11120330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=81.9 ms 11120330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11120330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=52.0 ms 11120330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.671/52.350/81.946/16.316 ms 11120330.ms:33.671 52.350 81.946 16.316 11120330.loss:0 11120400.ping:Thu Nov 12 04:00:16 PST 2009 11120400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11120400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11120400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11120400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 11120400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 11120400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11120400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.328/38.434/43.428/4.710 ms 11120400.ms:32.328 38.434 43.428 4.710 11120400.loss:0 11120430.ping:Thu Nov 12 04:30:16 PST 2009 11120430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11120430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=25.5 ms 11120430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=244 ms 11120430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11120430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11120430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11120430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.548/74.698/244.251/84.850 ms 11120430.ms:25.548 74.698 244.251 84.850 11120430.loss:0 11120500.ping:Thu Nov 12 05:00:16 PST 2009 11120500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=46.6 ms 11120500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=68.8 ms 11120500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11120500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11120500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11120500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11120500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.411/46.329/68.805/11.649 ms 11120500.ms:38.411 46.329 68.805 11.649 11120500.loss:0 11120530.ping:Thu Nov 12 05:30:16 PST 2009 11120530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11120530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11120530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11120530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11120530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11120530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11120530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.606/37.706/37.844/0.147 ms 11120530.ms:37.606 37.706 37.844 0.147 11120530.loss:0 11120600.ping:Thu Nov 12 06:00:16 PST 2009 11120600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11120600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11120600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.7 ms 11120600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=22.5 ms 11120600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11120600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.545/29.589/34.523/4.603 ms 11120600.ms:22.545 29.589 34.523 4.603 11120600.loss:0 11120630.ping:Thu Nov 12 06:30:11 PST 2009 11120630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11120630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11120630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11120630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11120630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11120630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.737/40.857/42.880/1.269 ms 11120630.ms:39.737 40.857 42.880 1.269 11120630.loss:0 11120700.ping:Thu Nov 12 07:00:16 PST 2009 11120700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11120700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11120700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 11120700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11120700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11120700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.446/36.911/42.726/4.662 ms 11120700.ms:32.446 36.911 42.726 4.662 11120700.loss:0 11120730.ping:Thu Nov 12 07:30:16 PST 2009 11120730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11120730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11120730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11120730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11120730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11120730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11120730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.160/36.766/37.702/0.966 ms 11120730.ms:35.160 36.766 37.702 0.966 11120730.loss:0 11120800.ping:Thu Nov 12 08:00:17 PST 2009 11120800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11120800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11120800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=53.9 ms 11120800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 11120800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11120800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11120800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.036/53.586/102.059/25.380 ms 11120800.ms:33.036 53.586 102.059 25.380 11120800.loss:0 11120830.ping:Thu Nov 12 08:30:16 PST 2009 11120830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11120830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11120830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11120830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11120830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=81.1 ms 11120830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.232/49.663/81.197/15.784 ms 11120830.ms:41.232 49.663 81.197 15.784 11120830.loss:0 11120900.ping:Thu Nov 12 09:00:16 PST 2009 11120900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11120900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11120900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11120900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11120900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11120900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.089/37.080/38.989/1.143 ms 11120900.ms:36.089 37.080 38.989 1.143 11120900.loss:0 11120930.ping:Thu Nov 12 09:30:07 PST 2009 11120930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11120930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11120930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11120930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=83.3 ms 11120930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11120930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11120930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11120930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11120930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.747/61.358/102.100/26.296 ms 11120930.ms:39.747 61.358 102.100 26.296 11120930.loss:0 11121000.ping:Thu Nov 12 10:00:17 PST 2009 11121000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.9 ms 11121000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 11121000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=87.3 ms 11121000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 11121000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=74.1 ms 11121000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 44.352/59.233/87.354/18.055 ms 11121000.ms:44.352 59.233 87.354 18.055 11121000.loss:0 11121030.ping:Thu Nov 12 10:30:16 PST 2009 11121030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.6 ms 11121030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11121030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=57.2 ms 11121030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11121030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11121030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 11121030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.152/43.947/57.216/8.419 ms 11121030.ms:37.152 43.947 57.216 8.419 11121030.loss:0 11121100.ping:Thu Nov 12 11:00:16 PST 2009 11121100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11121100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11121100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11121100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11121100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=84.6 ms 11121100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11121100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.327/45.673/84.660/19.748 ms 11121100.ms:33.327 45.673 84.660 19.748 11121100.loss:0 11121130.ping:Thu Nov 12 11:30:16 PST 2009 11121130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=52.9 ms 11121130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 11121130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11121130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=281 ms 11121130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11121130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.995/89.884/281.596/96.086 ms 11121130.ms:31.995 89.884 281.596 96.086 11121130.loss:0 11121200.ping:Thu Nov 12 12:00:16 PST 2009 11121200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=58.1 ms 11121200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=67.6 ms 11121200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11121200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=54.6 ms 11121200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=55.0 ms 11121200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.183/54.146/67.666/10.579 ms 11121200.ms:35.183 54.146 67.666 10.579 11121200.loss:0 11121230.ping:Thu Nov 12 12:30:16 PST 2009 11121230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=61.7 ms 11121230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.1 ms 11121230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=30.0 ms 11121230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11121230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11121230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.063/40.606/61.753/11.385 ms 11121230.ms:30.063 40.606 61.753 11.385 11121230.loss:0 11121300.ping:Thu Nov 12 13:00:17 PST 2009 11121300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11121300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11121300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 11121300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 11121300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=55.1 ms 11121300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11121300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.736/38.080/55.141/8.567 ms 11121300.ms:32.736 38.080 55.141 8.567 11121300.loss:0 11121330.ping:Thu Nov 12 13:30:16 PST 2009 11121330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=113 ms 11121330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11121330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11121330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=60.1 ms 11121330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11121330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.859/58.718/113.621/28.543 ms 11121330.ms:39.859 58.718 113.621 28.543 11121330.loss:0 11121400.ping:Thu Nov 12 14:00:16 PST 2009 11121400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 11121400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=67.2 ms 11121400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11121400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=56.8 ms 11121400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=46.8 ms 11121400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.035/47.280/67.275/13.866 ms 11121400.ms:28.035 47.280 67.275 13.866 11121400.loss:0 11121430.ping:Thu Nov 12 14:30:16 PST 2009 11121430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=685 ms 11121430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=649 ms 11121430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=638 ms 11121430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=708 ms 11121430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=707 ms 11121430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4377ms 11121430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 638.347/677.961/708.155/29.169 ms 11121430.ms:638.347 677.961 708.155 29.169 11121430.loss:0 11121500.ping:Thu Nov 12 15:00:16 PST 2009 11121500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11121500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11121500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=98.7 ms 11121500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11121500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=109 ms 11121500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11121500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.885/64.296/109.075/32.503 ms 11121500.ms:36.885 64.296 109.075 32.503 11121500.loss:0 11121530.ping:Thu Nov 12 15:30:16 PST 2009 11121530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=77.2 ms 11121530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=66.0 ms 11121530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.3 ms 11121530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 11121530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=136 ms 11121530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.764/72.895/136.057/34.614 ms 11121530.ms:35.764 72.895 136.057 34.614 11121530.loss:0 11121600.ping:Thu Nov 12 16:00:17 PST 2009 11121600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=209 ms 11121600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=187 ms 11121600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=165 ms 11121600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=155 ms 11121600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=126 ms 11121600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 126.214/168.655/209.147/28.298 ms 11121600.ms:126.214 168.655 209.147 28.298 11121600.loss:0 11121630.ping:Thu Nov 12 16:30:15 PST 2009 11121630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11121630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=62.5 ms 11121630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 11121630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=209 ms 11121630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11121630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.369/80.570/209.985/65.225 ms 11121630.ms:39.369 80.570 209.985 65.225 11121630.loss:0 11121700.ping:Thu Nov 12 17:00:17 PST 2009 11121700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.1 ms 11121700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.2 ms 11121700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.1 ms 11121700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.8 ms 11121700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 11121700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 48.504/58.168/92.100/16.996 ms 11121700.ms:48.504 58.168 92.100 16.996 11121700.loss:0 11121730.ping:Thu Nov 12 17:30:16 PST 2009 11121730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.2 ms 11121730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=202 ms 11121730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=121 ms 11121730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=202 ms 11121730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=161 ms 11121730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 93.208/156.227/202.026/43.292 ms 11121730.ms:93.208 156.227 202.026 43.292 11121730.loss:0 11121800.ping:Thu Nov 12 18:00:17 PST 2009 11121800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 11121800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.0 ms 11121800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 11121800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=88.3 ms 11121800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.1 ms 11121800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 48.180/56.977/88.342/15.697 ms 11121800.ms:48.180 56.977 88.342 15.697 11121800.loss:0 11121830.ping:Thu Nov 12 18:30:16 PST 2009 11121830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=53.9 ms 11121830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=61.2 ms 11121830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=54.9 ms 11121830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.8 ms 11121830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=52.0 ms 11121830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 52.029/55.212/61.271/3.178 ms 11121830.ms:52.029 55.212 61.271 3.178 11121830.loss:0 11121900.ping:Thu Nov 12 19:00:16 PST 2009 11121900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.1 ms 11121900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=103 ms 11121900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=70.7 ms 11121900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=70.5 ms 11121900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=70.2 ms 11121900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 70.201/81.363/103.115/13.729 ms 11121900.ms:70.201 81.363 103.115 13.729 11121900.loss:0 11121930.ping:Thu Nov 12 19:30:17 PST 2009 11121930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11121930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.7 ms 11121930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.4 ms 11121930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 11121930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 11121930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=85.2 ms 11121930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11121930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11121930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.145/54.207/85.277/15.571 ms 11121930.ms:45.145 54.207 85.277 15.571 11121930.loss:0 11122000.ping:Thu Nov 12 20:00:16 PST 2009 11122000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11122000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11122000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11122000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=68.4 ms 11122000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=58.0 ms 11122000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11122000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11122000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11122000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.834/48.219/68.421/12.689 ms 11122000.ms:37.834 48.219 68.421 12.689 11122000.loss:0 11122030.ping:Thu Nov 12 20:30:17 PST 2009 11122030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11122030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11122030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=95.8 ms 11122030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 11122030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=63.0 ms 11122030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.9 ms 11122030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11122030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11122030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.984/53.925/95.851/23.512 ms 11122030.ms:32.984 53.925 95.851 23.512 11122030.loss:0 11122100.ping:Thu Nov 12 21:00:16 PST 2009 11122100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11122100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=63.1 ms 11122100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=64.4 ms 11122100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 11122100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.0 ms 11122100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.0 ms 11122100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11122100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11122100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.053/45.437/64.432/15.043 ms 11122100.ms:32.053 45.437 64.432 15.043 11122100.loss:0 11122130.ping:Thu Nov 12 21:30:08 PST 2009 11122130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11122130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=58.9 ms 11122130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.5 ms 11122130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.4 ms 11122130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=47.1 ms 11122130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=57.4 ms 11122130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11122130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11122130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 47.183/51.718/58.954/5.321 ms 11122130.ms:47.183 51.718 58.954 5.321 11122130.loss:0 11122200.ping:Thu Nov 12 22:00:16 PST 2009 11122200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11122200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 11122200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11122200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11122200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=52.1 ms 11122200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11122200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11122200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11122200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.924/48.226/52.128/4.568 ms 11122200.ms:41.924 48.226 52.128 4.568 11122200.loss:0 11122230.ping:Thu Nov 12 22:30:16 PST 2009 11122230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11122230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=44.7 ms 11122230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=125 ms 11122230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=56.7 ms 11122230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=47.0 ms 11122230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=46.7 ms 11122230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11122230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11122230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 44.703/64.235/125.839/31.085 ms 11122230.ms:44.703 64.235 125.839 31.085 11122230.loss:0 11122300.ping:Thu Nov 12 23:00:16 PST 2009 11122300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11122300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 11122300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=52.0 ms 11122300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.2 ms 11122300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11122300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11122300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11122300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11122300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.682/48.580/52.268/4.373 ms 11122300.ms:41.682 48.580 52.268 4.373 11122300.loss:0 11122330.ping:Thu Nov 12 23:30:13 PST 2009 11122330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11122330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=52.5 ms 11122330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11122330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=60.9 ms 11122330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=60.9 ms 11122330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.5 ms 11122330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11122330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11122330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.158/53.223/60.951/7.382 ms 11122330.ms:41.158 53.223 60.951 7.382 11122330.loss:0 11130000.ping:Fri Nov 13 00:00:16 PST 2009 11130000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.9 ms 11130000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 11130000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.4 ms 11130000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11130000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11130000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.975/46.226/51.883/7.740 ms 11130000.ms:31.975 46.226 51.883 7.740 11130000.loss:0 11130030.ping:Fri Nov 13 00:30:16 PST 2009 11130030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=76.1 ms 11130030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=66.8 ms 11130030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=74.8 ms 11130030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11130030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.2 ms 11130030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.310/59.274/76.151/16.931 ms 11130030.ms:34.310 59.274 76.151 16.931 11130030.loss:0 11130100.ping:Fri Nov 13 01:00:16 PST 2009 11130100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=57.5 ms 11130100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.1 ms 11130100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=53.5 ms 11130100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 11130100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.5 ms 11130100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.240/48.375/57.509/5.970 ms 11130100.ms:43.240 48.375 57.509 5.970 11130100.loss:0 11130130.ping:Fri Nov 13 01:30:16 PST 2009 11130130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 11130130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 11130130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.1 ms 11130130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.3 ms 11130130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11130130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11130130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.668/41.686/46.306/5.114 ms 11130130.ms:34.668 41.686 46.306 5.114 11130130.loss:0 11130200.ping:Fri Nov 13 02:00:13 PST 2009 11130200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=61.2 ms 11130200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11130200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=59.6 ms 11130200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.8 ms 11130200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.0 ms 11130200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.601/52.070/61.276/7.834 ms 11130200.ms:39.601 52.070 61.276 7.834 11130200.loss:0 11130230.ping:Fri Nov 13 02:30:16 PST 2009 11130230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11130230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=88.1 ms 11130230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.0 ms 11130230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.2 ms 11130230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.1 ms 11130230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.562/54.841/88.187/16.868 ms 11130230.ms:41.562 54.841 88.187 16.868 11130230.loss:0 11130300.ping:Fri Nov 13 03:00:16 PST 2009 11130300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.6 ms 11130300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=129 ms 11130300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11130300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=59.1 ms 11130300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11130300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11130300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 47.686/66.826/129.113/31.412 ms 11130300.ms:47.686 66.826 129.113 31.412 11130300.loss:0 11130330.ping:Fri Nov 13 03:30:16 PST 2009 11130330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.8 ms 11130330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 11130330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.5 ms 11130330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.9 ms 11130330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11130330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11130330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.059/53.463/93.837/20.545 ms 11130330.ms:36.059 53.463 93.837 20.545 11130330.loss:0 11130400.ping:Fri Nov 13 04:00:16 PST 2009 11130400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=54.6 ms 11130400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 11130400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 11130400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=93.0 ms 11130400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=52.9 ms 11130400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.099/57.431/93.079/18.450 ms 11130400.ms:43.099 57.431 93.079 18.450 11130400.loss:0 11130430.ping:Fri Nov 13 04:30:17 PST 2009 11130430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=87.6 ms 11130430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=24.2 ms 11130430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.2 ms 11130430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.8 ms 11130430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11130430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 11130430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.201/48.831/87.656/21.802 ms 11130430.ms:24.201 48.831 87.656 21.802 11130430.loss:0 11130500.ping:Fri Nov 13 05:00:16 PST 2009 11130500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11130500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 11130500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11130500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.8 ms 11130500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11130500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.058/41.426/47.294/4.658 ms 11130500.ms:37.058 41.426 47.294 4.658 11130500.loss:0 11130530.ping:Fri Nov 13 05:30:16 PST 2009 11130530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11130530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=59.9 ms 11130530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.2 ms 11130530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.0 ms 11130530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 11130530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.280/50.449/59.937/5.929 ms 11130530.ms:41.280 50.449 59.937 5.929 11130530.loss:0 11130600.ping:Fri Nov 13 06:00:16 PST 2009 11130600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=59.3 ms 11130600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11130600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=79.5 ms 11130600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.8 ms 11130600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11130600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11130600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.081/55.211/79.596/13.777 ms 11130600.ms:39.081 55.211 79.596 13.777 11130600.loss:0 11130630.ping:Fri Nov 13 06:30:16 PST 2009 11130630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11130630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11130630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=27.9 ms 11130630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.1 ms 11130630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11130630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.951/38.478/48.144/6.423 ms 11130630.ms:27.951 38.478 48.144 6.423 11130630.loss:0 11130700.ping:Fri Nov 13 07:00:16 PST 2009 11130700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11130700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11130700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11130700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=93.0 ms 11130700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 11130700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11130700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.834/50.036/93.009/21.754 ms 11130700.ms:32.834 50.036 93.009 21.754 11130700.loss:0 11130730.ping:Fri Nov 13 07:30:17 PST 2009 11130730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=357 ms 11130730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=316 ms 11130730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=306 ms 11130730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=356 ms 11130730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=286 ms 11130730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 286.166/324.475/357.703/28.202 ms 11130730.ms:286.166 324.475 357.703 28.202 11130730.loss:0 11130800.ping:Fri Nov 13 08:00:16 PST 2009 11130800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=68.2 ms 11130800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=189 ms 11130800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11130800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11130800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 11130800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11130800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.462/76.051/189.627/57.780 ms 11130800.ms:40.462 76.051 189.627 57.780 11130800.loss:0 11130830.ping:Fri Nov 13 08:30:16 PST 2009 11130830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11130830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11130830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11130830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=115 ms 11130830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11130830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.804/52.226/115.965/31.874 ms 11130830.ms:35.804 52.226 115.965 31.874 11130830.loss:0 11130900.ping:Fri Nov 13 09:00:16 PST 2009 11130900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=57.9 ms 11130900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=59.0 ms 11130900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=63.2 ms 11130900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.9 ms 11130900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11130900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11130900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.724/51.196/63.265/11.513 ms 11130900.ms:32.724 51.196 63.265 11.513 11130900.loss:0 11130930.ping:Fri Nov 13 09:30:16 PST 2009 11130930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11130930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11130930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11130930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.8 ms 11130930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.8 ms 11130930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 11130930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11130930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11130930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.577/45.252/50.843/6.027 ms 11130930.ms:37.577 45.252 50.843 6.027 11130930.loss:0 11131000.ping:Fri Nov 13 10:00:16 PST 2009 11131000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=84.9 ms 11131000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 11131000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=55.0 ms 11131000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11131000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=173 ms 11131000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11131000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.137/79.925/173.150/49.043 ms 11131000.ms:43.137 79.925 173.150 49.043 11131000.loss:0 11131030.ping:Fri Nov 13 10:30:16 PST 2009 11131030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 11131030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=67.9 ms 11131030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.2 ms 11131030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=47.9 ms 11131030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.8 ms 11131030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11131030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 47.895/52.551/67.988/7.756 ms 11131030.ms:47.895 52.551 67.988 7.756 11131030.loss:0 11131100.ping:Fri Nov 13 11:00:16 PST 2009 11131100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=104 ms 11131100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 11131100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=85.0 ms 11131100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=64.7 ms 11131100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=73.0 ms 11131100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11131100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.265/74.169/104.742/20.480 ms 11131100.ms:43.265 74.169 104.742 20.480 11131100.loss:0 11131130.ping:Fri Nov 13 11:30:17 PST 2009 11131130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11131130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.9 ms 11131130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=58.6 ms 11131130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=59.7 ms 11131130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11131130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11131130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.784/48.803/59.774/9.184 ms 11131130.ms:37.784 48.803 59.774 9.184 11131130.loss:0 11131200.ping:Fri Nov 13 12:00:17 PST 2009 11131200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=73.5 ms 11131200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=63.0 ms 11131200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11131200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.2 ms 11131200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11131200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11131200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.403/54.343/73.564/12.359 ms 11131200.ms:41.403 54.343 73.564 12.359 11131200.loss:0 11131230.ping:Fri Nov 13 12:30:16 PST 2009 11131230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=383 ms 11131230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=509 ms 11131230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=538 ms 11131230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=568 ms 11131230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=491 ms 11131230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131230.ping:6 packets transmitted, 5 received, 16% packet loss, time 5345ms 11131230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 383.881/498.250/568.375/62.851 ms 11131230.ms:383.881 498.250 568.375 62.851 11131230.loss:16 11131300.ping:Fri Nov 13 13:00:17 PST 2009 11131300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=46.8 ms 11131300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11131300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=99.2 ms 11131300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=59.2 ms 11131300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.7 ms 11131300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11131300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.006/58.821/99.250/21.343 ms 11131300.ms:38.006 58.821 99.250 21.343 11131300.loss:0 11131330.ping:Fri Nov 13 13:30:09 PST 2009 11131330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=480 ms 11131330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=188 ms 11131330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=66.6 ms 11131330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 11131330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 11131330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4173ms 11131330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 44.604/164.930/480.322/166.507 ms 11131330.ms:44.604 164.930 480.322 166.507 11131330.loss:0 11131400.ping:Fri Nov 13 14:00:16 PST 2009 11131400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=70.7 ms 11131400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=81.7 ms 11131400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.7 ms 11131400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11131400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=236 ms 11131400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11131400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.169/96.897/236.133/70.906 ms 11131400.ms:43.169 96.897 236.133 70.906 11131400.loss:0 11131430.ping:Fri Nov 13 14:30:16 PST 2009 11131430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.8 ms 11131430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 11131430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=59.9 ms 11131430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.2 ms 11131430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 11131430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11131430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 46.292/49.402/59.984/5.320 ms 11131430.ms:46.292 49.402 59.984 5.320 11131430.loss:0 11131500.ping:Fri Nov 13 15:00:17 PST 2009 11131500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.6 ms 11131500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=48.6 ms 11131500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=57.4 ms 11131500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=87.3 ms 11131500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 11131500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11131500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 47.288/58.275/87.339/14.948 ms 11131500.ms:47.288 58.275 87.339 14.948 11131500.loss:0 11131530.ping:Fri Nov 13 15:30:16 PST 2009 11131530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11131530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.0 ms 11131530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.4 ms 11131530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=78.4 ms 11131530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11131530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11131530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.534/50.195/78.472/15.027 ms 11131530.ms:36.534 50.195 78.472 15.027 11131530.loss:0 11131600.ping:Fri Nov 13 16:00:17 PST 2009 11131600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.3 ms 11131600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.0 ms 11131600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.7 ms 11131600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=85.7 ms 11131600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.3 ms 11131600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11131600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.354/54.249/85.752/15.768 ms 11131600.ms:45.354 54.249 85.752 15.768 11131600.loss:0 11131630.ping:Fri Nov 13 16:30:16 PST 2009 11131630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.6 ms 11131630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.6 ms 11131630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.8 ms 11131630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.6 ms 11131630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 11131630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11131630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 48.536/49.666/51.652/1.268 ms 11131630.ms:48.536 49.666 51.652 1.268 11131630.loss:0 11131700.ping:Fri Nov 13 17:00:16 PST 2009 11131700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.9 ms 11131700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=79.0 ms 11131700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=369 ms 11131700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.3 ms 11131700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=99.4 ms 11131700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11131700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 47.994/129.361/369.978/121.810 ms 11131700.ms:47.994 129.361 369.978 121.810 11131700.loss:0 11131730.ping:Fri Nov 13 17:30:17 PST 2009 11131730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 11131730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11131730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=62.3 ms 11131730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.3 ms 11131730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=171 ms 11131730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11131730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.330/74.886/171.816/48.974 ms 11131730.ms:40.330 74.886 171.816 48.974 11131730.loss:0 11131800.ping:Fri Nov 13 18:00:10 PST 2009 11131800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131800.ping:From jimbo.YAK.net (207.47.3.211) icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable 11131800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131800.ping:2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1009ms 11131800.ms:399 399 399 11131800.loss:100 11131830.ping:Fri Nov 13 18:30:16 PST 2009 11131830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11131830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 11131830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11131830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11131830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=27.0 ms 11131830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11131830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.003/37.511/47.203/6.445 ms 11131830.ms:27.003 37.511 47.203 6.445 11131830.loss:0 11131900.ping:Fri Nov 13 19:00:14 PST 2009 11131900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11131900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11131900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11131900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11131900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11131900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11131900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.089/36.603/38.330/0.881 ms 11131900.ms:36.089 36.603 38.330 0.881 11131900.loss:0 11131930.ping:Fri Nov 13 19:30:16 PST 2009 11131930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11131930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=891 ms 11131930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=69.1 ms 11131930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=91.1 ms 11131930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=518 ms 11131930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=547 ms 11131930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11131930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4234ms 11131930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.142/423.611/891.733/309.746 ms 11131930.ms:69.142 423.611 891.733 309.746 11131930.loss:0 11132000.ping:Fri Nov 13 20:00:16 PST 2009 11132000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11132000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11132000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=184 ms 11132000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11132000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 11132000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=24.3 ms 11132000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11132000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11132000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.301/62.883/184.222/60.824 ms 11132000.ms:24.301 62.883 184.222 60.824 11132000.loss:0 11132030.ping:Fri Nov 13 20:30:16 PST 2009 11132030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11132030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.4 ms 11132030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11132030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=29.4 ms 11132030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11132030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11132030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11132030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11132030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.438/38.835/47.443/5.716 ms 11132030.ms:29.438 38.835 47.443 5.716 11132030.loss:0 11132100.ping:Fri Nov 13 21:00:16 PST 2009 11132100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11132100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11132100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11132100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11132100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11132100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11132100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11132100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11132100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.321/35.734/41.307/4.168 ms 11132100.ms:32.321 35.734 41.307 4.168 11132100.loss:0 11132130.ping:Fri Nov 13 21:30:16 PST 2009 11132130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11132130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11132130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11132130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11132130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11132130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11132130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11132130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11132130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.661/40.910/41.543/0.747 ms 11132130.ms:39.661 40.910 41.543 0.747 11132130.loss:0 11132200.ping:Fri Nov 13 22:00:16 PST 2009 11132200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11132200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11132200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11132200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=76.6 ms 11132200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11132200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11132200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11132200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11132200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.427/44.999/76.686/15.862 ms 11132200.ms:36.427 44.999 76.686 15.862 11132200.loss:0 11132230.ping:Fri Nov 13 22:30:16 PST 2009 11132230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11132230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 11132230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11132230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.4 ms 11132230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=25.4 ms 11132230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11132230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11132230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11132230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.429/30.749/35.215/4.383 ms 11132230.ms:25.429 30.749 35.215 4.383 11132230.loss:0 11132300.ping:Fri Nov 13 23:00:10 PST 2009 11132300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11132300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11132300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=141 ms 11132300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 11132300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=182 ms 11132300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11132300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11132300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11132300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.549/102.125/182.995/55.566 ms 11132300.ms:40.549 102.125 182.995 55.566 11132300.loss:0 11132330.ping:Fri Nov 13 23:30:16 PST 2009 11132330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11132330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.5 ms 11132330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11132330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11132330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=121 ms 11132330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=61.1 ms 11132330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11132330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11132330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.584/61.902/121.533/30.705 ms 11132330.ms:41.584 61.902 121.533 30.705 11132330.loss:0 11140000.ping:Sat Nov 14 00:00:16 PST 2009 11140000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11140000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11140000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11140000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=58.5 ms 11140000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11140000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11140000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.484/41.849/58.500/8.356 ms 11140000.ms:36.484 41.849 58.500 8.356 11140000.loss:0 11140030.ping:Sat Nov 14 00:30:16 PST 2009 11140030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 11140030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=26.4 ms 11140030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11140030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11140030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11140030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11140030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.435/35.751/40.653/4.940 ms 11140030.ms:26.435 35.751 40.653 4.940 11140030.loss:0 11140100.ping:Sat Nov 14 01:00:10 PST 2009 11140100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11140100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=202 ms 11140100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11140100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=182 ms 11140100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11140100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.772/97.428/202.795/78.076 ms 11140100.ms:32.772 97.428 202.795 78.076 11140100.loss:0 11140130.ping:Sat Nov 14 01:30:16 PST 2009 11140130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11140130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11140130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=125 ms 11140130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11140130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11140130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.135/53.744/125.323/35.799 ms 11140130.ms:35.135 53.744 125.323 35.799 11140130.loss:0 11140200.ping:Sat Nov 14 02:00:16 PST 2009 11140200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=222 ms 11140200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=150 ms 11140200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11140200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11140200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11140200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.040/98.884/222.459/75.100 ms 11140200.ms:40.040 98.884 222.459 75.100 11140200.loss:0 11140230.ping:Sat Nov 14 02:30:16 PST 2009 11140230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11140230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11140230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11140230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11140230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11140230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11140230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.489/40.831/41.599/0.829 ms 11140230.ms:39.489 40.831 41.599 0.829 11140230.loss:0 11140300.ping:Sat Nov 14 03:00:16 PST 2009 11140300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11140300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11140300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11140300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11140300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11140300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.250/36.742/38.231/0.766 ms 11140300.ms:36.250 36.742 38.231 0.766 11140300.loss:0 11140330.ping:Sat Nov 14 03:30:09 PST 2009 11140330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11140330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11140330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11140330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=79.7 ms 11140330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11140330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.647/48.111/79.741/15.838 ms 11140330.ms:39.647 48.111 79.741 15.838 11140330.loss:0 11140400.ping:Sat Nov 14 04:00:16 PST 2009 11140400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11140400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11140400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 11140400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=64.5 ms 11140400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 11140400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11140400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.370/41.762/64.500/11.836 ms 11140400.ms:33.370 41.762 64.500 11.836 11140400.loss:0 11140430.ping:Sat Nov 14 04:30:16 PST 2009 11140430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11140430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11140430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11140430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11140430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11140430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11140430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.591/36.561/38.079/1.001 ms 11140430.ms:35.591 36.561 38.079 1.001 11140430.loss:0 11140500.ping:Sat Nov 14 05:00:16 PST 2009 11140500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11140500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 11140500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11140500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11140500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11140500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11140500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.274/38.770/46.426/3.901 ms 11140500.ms:36.274 38.770 46.426 3.901 11140500.loss:0 11140530.ping:Sat Nov 14 05:30:16 PST 2009 11140530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11140530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=141 ms 11140530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=71.6 ms 11140530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11140530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=121 ms 11140530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.523/81.977/141.828/43.043 ms 11140530.ms:33.523 81.977 141.828 43.043 11140530.loss:0 11140600.ping:Sat Nov 14 06:00:16 PST 2009 11140600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=29.0 ms 11140600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11140600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=70.5 ms 11140600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11140600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11140600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11140600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.069/43.082/70.502/14.201 ms 11140600.ms:29.069 43.082 70.502 14.201 11140600.loss:0 11140630.ping:Sat Nov 14 06:30:09 PST 2009 11140630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=52.9 ms 11140630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 11140630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11140630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11140630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=69.9 ms 11140630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.993/49.244/69.929/11.367 ms 11140630.ms:39.993 49.244 69.929 11.367 11140630.loss:0 11140700.ping:Sat Nov 14 07:00:16 PST 2009 11140700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 11140700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.1 ms 11140700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11140700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=71.1 ms 11140700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=30.6 ms 11140700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.653/41.417/71.119/15.333 ms 11140700.ms:30.653 41.417 71.119 15.333 11140700.loss:0 11140730.ping:Sat Nov 14 07:30:16 PST 2009 11140730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=287 ms 11140730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=287 ms 11140730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=314 ms 11140730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=294 ms 11140730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=274 ms 11140730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 274.037/291.456/314.195/13.112 ms 11140730.ms:274.037 291.456 314.195 13.112 11140730.loss:0 11140800.ping:Sat Nov 14 08:00:16 PST 2009 11140800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11140800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11140800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11140800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11140800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11140800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11140800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.780/38.141/42.717/4.338 ms 11140800.ms:32.780 38.141 42.717 4.338 11140800.loss:0 11140830.ping:Sat Nov 14 08:30:17 PST 2009 11140830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11140830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=112 ms 11140830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11140830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11140830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=121 ms 11140830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11140830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.253/70.181/121.775/38.475 ms 11140830.ms:33.253 70.181 121.775 38.475 11140830.loss:0 11140900.ping:Sat Nov 14 09:00:17 PST 2009 11140900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11140900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=61.7 ms 11140900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11140900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 11140900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 11140900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11140900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.993/42.322/61.744/10.501 ms 11140900.ms:32.993 42.322 61.744 10.501 11140900.loss:0 11140930.ping:Sat Nov 14 09:30:17 PST 2009 11140930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11140930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=24.2 ms 11140930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 11140930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=102 ms 11140930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11140930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11140930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11140930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11140930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.213/48.521/102.069/27.614 ms 11140930.ms:24.213 48.521 102.069 27.614 11140930.loss:0 11141000.ping:Sat Nov 14 10:00:17 PST 2009 11141000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11141000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11141000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11141000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=58.7 ms 11141000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11141000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11141000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.144/42.009/58.771/8.435 ms 11141000.ms:37.144 42.009 58.771 8.435 11141000.loss:0 11141030.ping:Sat Nov 14 10:30:16 PST 2009 11141030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11141030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11141030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=54.3 ms 11141030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 11141030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11141030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11141030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.156/40.731/54.379/7.777 ms 11141030.ms:34.156 40.731 54.379 7.777 11141030.loss:0 11141100.ping:Sat Nov 14 11:00:17 PST 2009 11141100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=51.2 ms 11141100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=59.4 ms 11141100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11141100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=59.5 ms 11141100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11141100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11141100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.249/49.807/59.589/9.053 ms 11141100.ms:39.249 49.807 59.589 9.053 11141100.loss:0 11141130.ping:Sat Nov 14 11:30:16 PST 2009 11141130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11141130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11141130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 11141130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11141130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=182 ms 11141130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11141130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.266/64.723/182.512/59.012 ms 11141130.ms:32.266 64.723 182.512 59.012 11141130.loss:0 11141200.ping:Sat Nov 14 12:00:17 PST 2009 11141200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=359 ms 11141200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=250 ms 11141200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=201 ms 11141200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=71.3 ms 11141200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11141200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11141200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.545/185.032/359.817/117.185 ms 11141200.ms:41.545 185.032 359.817 117.185 11141200.loss:0 11141230.ping:Sat Nov 14 12:30:17 PST 2009 11141230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11141230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11141230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11141230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=76.6 ms 11141230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=56.3 ms 11141230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11141230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.670/49.479/76.691/15.360 ms 11141230.ms:36.670 49.479 76.691 15.360 11141230.loss:0 11141300.ping:Sat Nov 14 13:00:16 PST 2009 11141300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11141300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11141300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11141300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=71.7 ms 11141300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11141300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11141300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.570/46.111/71.736/13.199 ms 11141300.ms:33.570 46.111 71.736 13.199 11141300.loss:0 11141330.ping:Sat Nov 14 13:30:16 PST 2009 11141330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=164 ms 11141330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=165 ms 11141330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=166 ms 11141330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=266 ms 11141330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=166 ms 11141330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11141330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 164.544/186.140/266.880/40.378 ms 11141330.ms:164.544 186.140 266.880 40.378 11141330.loss:0 11141400.ping:Sat Nov 14 14:00:17 PST 2009 11141400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11141400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11141400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11141400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11141400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11141400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11141400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.719/38.678/41.443/3.062 ms 11141400.ms:32.719 38.678 41.443 3.062 11141400.loss:0 11141430.ping:Sat Nov 14 14:30:17 PST 2009 11141430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=60.8 ms 11141430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11141430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 11141430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11141430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11141430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11141430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.613/42.141/60.803/10.287 ms 11141430.ms:32.613 42.141 60.803 10.287 11141430.loss:0 11141500.ping:Sat Nov 14 15:00:16 PST 2009 11141500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=321 ms 11141500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=309 ms 11141500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=229 ms 11141500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=219 ms 11141500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=259 ms 11141500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11141500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 219.952/268.304/321.726/41.162 ms 11141500.ms:219.952 268.304 321.726 41.162 11141500.loss:0 11141530.ping:Sat Nov 14 15:30:16 PST 2009 11141530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11141530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11141530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 11141530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 11141530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 11141530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11141530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.536/34.052/34.908/0.883 ms 11141530.ms:32.536 34.052 34.908 0.883 11141530.loss:0 11141600.ping:Sat Nov 14 16:00:16 PST 2009 11141600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11141600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11141600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11141600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11141600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11141600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11141600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.906/37.359/37.635/0.360 ms 11141600.ms:36.906 37.359 37.635 0.360 11141600.loss:0 11141630.ping:Sat Nov 14 16:30:16 PST 2009 11141630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11141630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=56.6 ms 11141630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11141630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=26.4 ms 11141630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11141630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11141630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.459/38.963/56.616/9.792 ms 11141630.ms:26.459 38.963 56.616 9.792 11141630.loss:0 11141700.ping:Sat Nov 14 17:00:13 PST 2009 11141700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=375 ms 11141700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=379 ms 11141700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=390 ms 11141700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=389 ms 11141700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=390 ms 11141700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4154ms 11141700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 375.200/384.906/390.250/6.473 ms 11141700.ms:375.200 384.906 390.250 6.473 11141700.loss:0 11141730.ping:Sat Nov 14 17:30:16 PST 2009 11141730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 11141730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11141730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 11141730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11141730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11141730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11141730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.382/33.760/35.940/1.352 ms 11141730.ms:32.382 33.760 35.940 1.352 11141730.loss:0 11141800.ping:Sat Nov 14 18:00:16 PST 2009 11141800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=972 ms 11141800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=438 ms 11141800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=768 ms 11141800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=778 ms 11141800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=817 ms 11141800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4474ms 11141800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 438.331/755.145/972.016/174.407 ms 11141800.ms:438.331 755.145 972.016 174.407 11141800.loss:0 11141830.ping:Sat Nov 14 18:30:16 PST 2009 11141830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11141830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=69.6 ms 11141830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 11141830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11141830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11141830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11141830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.546/45.993/69.662/11.864 ms 11141830.ms:38.546 45.993 69.662 11.864 11141830.loss:0 11141900.ping:Sat Nov 14 19:00:16 PST 2009 11141900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11141900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11141900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11141900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=27.4 ms 11141900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11141900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11141900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.420/34.942/37.622/3.843 ms 11141900.ms:27.420 34.942 37.622 3.843 11141900.loss:0 11141930.ping:Sat Nov 14 19:30:16 PST 2009 11141930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11141930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=162 ms 11141930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=187 ms 11141930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=160 ms 11141930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=161 ms 11141930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=190 ms 11141930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11141930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11141930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 160.753/172.472/190.668/13.438 ms 11141930.ms:160.753 172.472 190.668 13.438 11141930.loss:0 11142000.ping:Sat Nov 14 20:00:16 PST 2009 11142000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11142000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 11142000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11142000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.5 ms 11142000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11142000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.3 ms 11142000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11142000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11142000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.321/45.792/51.590/4.673 ms 11142000.ms:41.321 45.792 51.590 4.673 11142000.loss:0 11142030.ping:Sat Nov 14 20:30:16 PST 2009 11142030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11142030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=184 ms 11142030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=65.1 ms 11142030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11142030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11142030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=96.4 ms 11142030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11142030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11142030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.137/83.644/184.056/54.904 ms 11142030.ms:36.137 83.644 184.056 54.904 11142030.loss:0 11142100.ping:Sat Nov 14 21:00:16 PST 2009 11142100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11142100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11142100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 11142100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.8 ms 11142100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11142100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 11142100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11142100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11142100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.650/38.043/43.846/4.683 ms 11142100.ms:33.650 38.043 43.846 4.683 11142100.loss:0 11142130.ping:Sat Nov 14 21:30:16 PST 2009 11142130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11142130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11142130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11142130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11142130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11142130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11142130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11142130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11142130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.258/37.677/38.426/0.846 ms 11142130.ms:36.258 37.677 38.426 0.846 11142130.loss:0 11142200.ping:Sat Nov 14 22:00:16 PST 2009 11142200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11142200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=213 ms 11142200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11142200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=53.5 ms 11142200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11142200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11142200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11142200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11142200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.859/76.151/213.218/68.844 ms 11142200.ms:34.859 76.151 213.218 68.844 11142200.loss:0 11142230.ping:Sat Nov 14 22:30:09 PST 2009 11142230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11142230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=211 ms 11142230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=232 ms 11142230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=203 ms 11142230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 11142230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11142230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11142230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11142230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.799/142.557/232.153/90.082 ms 11142230.ms:32.799 142.557 232.153 90.082 11142230.loss:0 11142300.ping:Sat Nov 14 23:00:17 PST 2009 11142300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11142300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 11142300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11142300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11142300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.3 ms 11142300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 11142300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11142300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11142300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.322/37.718/41.284/4.392 ms 11142300.ms:31.322 37.718 41.284 4.392 11142300.loss:0 11142330.ping:Sat Nov 14 23:30:17 PST 2009 11142330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11142330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11142330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11142330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11142330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11142330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11142330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11142330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11142330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.135/36.710/37.627/0.612 ms 11142330.ms:36.135 36.710 37.627 0.612 11142330.loss:0 11150000.ping:Sun Nov 15 00:00:16 PST 2009 11150000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=172 ms 11150000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11150000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 11150000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11150000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11150000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11150000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.089/62.420/172.977/55.279 ms 11150000.ms:34.089 62.420 172.977 55.279 11150000.loss:0 11150030.ping:Sun Nov 15 00:30:16 PST 2009 11150030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11150030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11150030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11150030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11150030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11150030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11150030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.839/37.449/38.335/0.919 ms 11150030.ms:35.839 37.449 38.335 0.919 11150030.loss:0 11150100.ping:Sun Nov 15 01:00:16 PST 2009 11150100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=365 ms 11150100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=364 ms 11150100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=333 ms 11150100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=393 ms 11150100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=373 ms 11150100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11150100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 333.441/366.087/393.727/19.438 ms 11150100.ms:333.441 366.087 393.727 19.438 11150100.loss:0 11150130.ping:Sun Nov 15 01:30:16 PST 2009 11150130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=70.2 ms 11150130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11150130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11150130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 11150130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11150130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11150130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.015/42.591/70.251/14.385 ms 11150130.ms:28.015 42.591 70.251 14.385 11150130.loss:0 11150200.ping:Sun Nov 15 02:00:17 PST 2009 11150200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 11150200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11150200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11150200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11150200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11150200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11150200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.059/35.681/43.199/3.866 ms 11150200.ms:33.059 35.681 43.199 3.866 11150200.loss:0 11150230.ping:Sun Nov 15 02:30:16 PST 2009 11150230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11150230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11150230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=65.7 ms 11150230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11150230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11150230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11150230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.897/42.856/65.777/11.487 ms 11150230.ms:35.897 42.856 65.777 11.487 11150230.loss:0 11150300.ping:Sun Nov 15 03:00:11 PST 2009 11150300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 11150300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 11150300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.3 ms 11150300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11150300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.4 ms 11150300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11150300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.435/40.023/51.321/7.511 ms 11150300.ms:31.435 40.023 51.321 7.511 11150300.loss:0 11150330.ping:Sun Nov 15 03:30:16 PST 2009 11150330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11150330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=138 ms 11150330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11150330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11150330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=195 ms 11150330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11150330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.069/88.893/195.893/66.594 ms 11150330.ms:36.069 88.893 195.893 66.594 11150330.loss:0 11150400.ping:Sun Nov 15 04:00:16 PST 2009 11150400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.9 ms 11150400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11150400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=29.2 ms 11150400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.8 ms 11150400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11150400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11150400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.817/34.251/43.128/5.799 ms 11150400.ms:28.817 34.251 43.128 5.799 11150400.loss:0 11150430.ping:Sun Nov 15 04:30:16 PST 2009 11150430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=24.0 ms 11150430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11150430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11150430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11150430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=62.1 ms 11150430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11150430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.058/40.640/62.154/12.644 ms 11150430.ms:24.058 40.640 62.154 12.644 11150430.loss:0 11150500.ping:Sun Nov 15 05:00:16 PST 2009 11150500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11150500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=74.7 ms 11150500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=144 ms 11150500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=194 ms 11150500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=134 ms 11150500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11150500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.862/117.167/194.842/55.407 ms 11150500.ms:36.862 117.167 194.842 55.407 11150500.loss:0 11150530.ping:Sun Nov 15 05:30:16 PST 2009 11150530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 11150530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.7 ms 11150530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=58.0 ms 11150530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=58.0 ms 11150530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11150530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11150530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.773/47.460/58.090/9.562 ms 11150530.ms:35.773 47.460 58.090 9.562 11150530.loss:0 11150600.ping:Sun Nov 15 06:00:16 PST 2009 11150600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=147 ms 11150600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11150600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 11150600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11150600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=138 ms 11150600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11150600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.655/81.027/147.949/50.987 ms 11150600.ms:38.655 81.027 147.949 50.987 11150600.loss:0 11150630.ping:Sun Nov 15 06:30:16 PST 2009 11150630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11150630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11150630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11150630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11150630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11150630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11150630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.877/38.256/38.994/0.400 ms 11150630.ms:37.877 38.256 38.994 0.400 11150630.loss:0 11150700.ping:Sun Nov 15 07:00:16 PST 2009 11150700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 11150700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=81.0 ms 11150700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11150700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11150700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11150700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11150700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.001/49.488/81.077/15.814 ms 11150700.ms:41.001 49.488 81.077 15.814 11150700.loss:0 11150730.ping:Sun Nov 15 07:30:16 PST 2009 11150730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11150730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=136 ms 11150730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=96.0 ms 11150730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11150730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=56.6 ms 11150730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11150730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.944/71.816/136.528/39.315 ms 11150730.ms:33.944 71.816 136.528 39.315 11150730.loss:0 11150800.ping:Sun Nov 15 08:00:16 PST 2009 11150800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=571 ms 11150800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=649 ms 11150800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=680 ms 11150800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=681 ms 11150800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=752 ms 11150800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4790ms 11150800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 571.567/667.089/752.832/58.596 ms 11150800.ms:571.567 667.089 752.832 58.596 11150800.loss:0 11150830.ping:Sun Nov 15 08:30:16 PST 2009 11150830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11150830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11150830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11150830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11150830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11150830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11150830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.668/38.092/39.457/0.981 ms 11150830.ms:36.668 38.092 39.457 0.981 11150830.loss:0 11150900.ping:Sun Nov 15 09:00:16 PST 2009 11150900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11150900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11150900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11150900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 11150900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 11150900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11150900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.437/40.939/41.703/0.881 ms 11150900.loss:0 11150900.ms:39.437 40.939 41.703 0.881 11150930.ping:Sun Nov 15 09:30:16 PST 2009 11150930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11150930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11150930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11150930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11150930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11150930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=78.4 ms 11150930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11150930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11150930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.576/45.957/78.430/16.255 ms 11150930.ms:36.576 45.957 78.430 16.255 11150930.loss:0 11151000.ping:Sun Nov 15 10:00:16 PST 2009 11151000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11151000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=77.8 ms 11151000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11151000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11151000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11151000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.972/46.359/77.804/15.742 ms 11151000.ms:37.972 46.359 77.804 15.742 11151000.loss:0 11151030.ping:Sun Nov 15 10:30:16 PST 2009 11151030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=58.8 ms 11151030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 11151030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11151030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=47.0 ms 11151030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11151030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11151030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.857/43.850/58.824/8.344 ms 11151030.ms:36.857 43.850 58.824 8.344 11151030.loss:0 11151100.ping:Sun Nov 15 11:00:16 PST 2009 11151100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11151100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11151100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11151100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.8 ms 11151100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11151100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11151100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.867/32.687/35.859/3.965 ms 11151100.ms:24.867 32.687 35.859 3.965 11151100.loss:0 11151130.ping:Sun Nov 15 11:30:16 PST 2009 11151130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=59.8 ms 11151130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11151130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 11151130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11151130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=30.7 ms 11151130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11151130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.792/42.651/59.823/9.442 ms 11151130.ms:30.792 42.651 59.823 9.442 11151130.loss:0 11151200.ping:Sun Nov 15 12:00:16 PST 2009 11151200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11151200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=48.8 ms 11151200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11151200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 11151200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11151200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11151200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.110/41.761/48.863/5.015 ms 11151200.ms:36.110 41.761 48.863 5.015 11151200.loss:0 11151230.ping:Sun Nov 15 12:30:17 PST 2009 11151230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=69.1 ms 11151230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11151230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=27.8 ms 11151230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=507 ms 11151230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11151230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.863/135.932/507.434/186.274 ms 11151230.ms:27.863 135.932 507.434 186.274 11151230.loss:0 11151300.ping:Sun Nov 15 13:00:17 PST 2009 11151300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=60.2 ms 11151300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11151300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11151300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11151300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=68.1 ms 11151300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.207/48.635/68.144/12.958 ms 11151300.ms:38.207 48.635 68.144 12.958 11151300.loss:0 11151330.ping:Sun Nov 15 13:30:16 PST 2009 11151330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11151330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11151330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11151330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11151330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 11151330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.132/33.676/35.104/0.737 ms 11151330.ms:33.132 33.676 35.104 0.737 11151330.loss:0 11151400.ping:Sun Nov 15 14:00:17 PST 2009 11151400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11151400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=114 ms 11151400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=30.6 ms 11151400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11151400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.7 ms 11151400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11151400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.638/49.948/114.375/32.403 ms 11151400.ms:30.638 49.948 114.375 32.403 11151400.loss:0 11151430.ping:Sun Nov 15 14:30:17 PST 2009 11151430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11151430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11151430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11151430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11151430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=27.3 ms 11151430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.379/35.915/39.426/4.334 ms 11151430.ms:27.379 35.915 39.426 4.334 11151430.loss:0 11151500.ping:Sun Nov 15 15:00:17 PST 2009 11151500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=44.2 ms 11151500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11151500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=62.7 ms 11151500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 11151500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11151500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4010ms 11151500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.196/44.419/62.778/10.062 ms 11151500.ms:32.196 44.419 62.778 10.062 11151500.loss:0 11151530.ping:Sun Nov 15 15:30:17 PST 2009 11151530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11151530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11151530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11151530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=73.0 ms 11151530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11151530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.221/41.641/73.097/15.742 ms 11151530.ms:33.221 41.641 73.097 15.742 11151530.loss:0 11151600.ping:Sun Nov 15 16:00:16 PST 2009 11151600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11151600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11151600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11151600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11151600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11151600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11151600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.341/37.800/38.440/0.841 ms 11151600.ms:36.341 37.800 38.440 0.841 11151600.loss:0 11151630.ping:Sun Nov 15 16:30:16 PST 2009 11151630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=67.2 ms 11151630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11151630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=55.0 ms 11151630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11151630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11151630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.083/45.545/67.215/13.292 ms 11151630.ms:35.083 45.545 67.215 13.292 11151630.loss:0 11151700.ping:Sun Nov 15 17:00:16 PST 2009 11151700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11151700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11151700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11151700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11151700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11151700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.003/38.655/42.302/4.190 ms 11151700.ms:33.003 38.655 42.302 4.190 11151700.loss:0 11151730.ping:Sun Nov 15 17:30:09 PST 2009 11151730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=81.4 ms 11151730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 11151730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=69.5 ms 11151730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=89.5 ms 11151730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=30.6 ms 11151730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.686/62.165/89.522/23.138 ms 11151730.ms:30.686 62.165 89.522 23.138 11151730.loss:0 11151800.ping:Sun Nov 15 18:00:17 PST 2009 11151800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11151800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 11151800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11151800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=67.8 ms 11151800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=57.8 ms 11151800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11151800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.028/46.389/67.860/14.408 ms 11151800.ms:28.028 46.389 67.860 14.408 11151800.loss:0 11151830.ping:Sun Nov 15 18:30:16 PST 2009 11151830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 11151830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11151830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=66.8 ms 11151830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11151830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11151830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11151830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.613/42.430/66.860/12.249 ms 11151830.ms:34.613 42.430 66.860 12.249 11151830.loss:0 11151900.ping:Sun Nov 15 19:00:16 PST 2009 11151900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11151900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11151900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11151900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11151900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11151900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11151900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.864/38.387/39.735/0.726 ms 11151900.ms:37.864 38.387 39.735 0.726 11151900.loss:0 11151930.ping:Sun Nov 15 19:30:16 PST 2009 11151930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11151930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11151930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 11151930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11151930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=64.6 ms 11151930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=24.6 ms 11151930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11151930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11151930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.698/37.955/64.690/13.809 ms 11151930.ms:24.698 37.955 64.690 13.809 11151930.loss:0 11152000.ping:Sun Nov 15 20:00:16 PST 2009 11152000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11152000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=195 ms 11152000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=284 ms 11152000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=194 ms 11152000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=234 ms 11152000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=214 ms 11152000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11152000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11152000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 194.985/224.563/284.076/33.012 ms 11152000.ms:194.985 224.563 284.076 33.012 11152000.loss:0 11152030.ping:Sun Nov 15 20:30:16 PST 2009 11152030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11152030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11152030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11152030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11152030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 11152030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11152030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11152030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11152030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.939/40.075/48.556/4.287 ms 11152030.ms:36.939 40.075 48.556 4.287 11152030.loss:0 11152100.ping:Sun Nov 15 21:00:17 PST 2009 11152100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11152100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=382 ms 11152100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=452 ms 11152100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=563 ms 11152100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=683 ms 11152100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=523 ms 11152100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11152100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11152100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 382.127/521.222/683.761/102.251 ms 11152100.ms:382.127 521.222 683.761 102.251 11152100.loss:0 11152130.ping:Sun Nov 15 21:30:16 PST 2009 11152130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11152130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11152130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11152130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11152130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 11152130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 11152130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11152130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11152130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.729/38.270/43.460/4.603 ms 11152130.ms:32.729 38.270 43.460 4.603 11152130.loss:0 11152200.ping:Sun Nov 15 22:00:16 PST 2009 11152200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11152200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11152200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.3 ms 11152200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11152200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 11152200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 11152200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11152200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11152200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.333/41.063/51.864/6.845 ms 11152200.ms:30.333 41.063 51.864 6.845 11152200.loss:0 11152230.ping:Sun Nov 15 22:30:12 PST 2009 11152230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11152230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=82.6 ms 11152230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11152230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11152230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=110 ms 11152230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=60.3 ms 11152230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11152230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11152230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.459/66.914/110.657/26.838 ms 11152230.ms:40.459 66.914 110.657 26.838 11152230.loss:0 11152300.ping:Sun Nov 15 23:00:16 PST 2009 11152300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11152300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 11152300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11152300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11152300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11152300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 11152300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11152300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11152300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.807/34.420/35.291/0.985 ms 11152300.ms:32.807 34.420 35.291 0.985 11152300.loss:0 11152330.ping:Sun Nov 15 23:30:16 PST 2009 11152330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11152330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.5 ms 11152330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=60.3 ms 11152330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11152330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11152330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11152330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11152330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11152330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.543/42.556/60.377/9.532 ms 11152330.ms:31.543 42.556 60.377 9.532 11152330.loss:0 11160000.ping:Mon Nov 16 00:00:16 PST 2009 11160000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 11160000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 11160000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.4 ms 11160000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.5 ms 11160000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=25.2 ms 11160000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11160000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.200/32.781/45.542/7.437 ms 11160000.ms:25.200 32.781 45.542 7.437 11160000.loss:0 11160030.ping:Mon Nov 16 00:30:16 PST 2009 11160030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=145 ms 11160030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=154 ms 11160030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=134 ms 11160030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=154 ms 11160030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=174 ms 11160030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11160030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 134.398/152.521/174.240/13.118 ms 11160030.ms:134.398 152.521 174.240 13.118 11160030.loss:0 11160100.ping:Mon Nov 16 01:00:16 PST 2009 11160100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11160100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11160100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 11160100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11160100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 11160100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11160100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.515/33.145/33.530/0.391 ms 11160100.ms:32.515 33.145 33.530 0.391 11160100.loss:0 11160130.ping:Mon Nov 16 01:30:16 PST 2009 11160130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 11160130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 11160130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11160130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11160130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11160130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.860/36.439/38.386/0.985 ms 11160130.ms:35.860 36.439 38.386 0.985 11160130.loss:0 11160200.ping:Mon Nov 16 02:00:16 PST 2009 11160200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 11160200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11160200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11160200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11160200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11160200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.811/37.327/38.865/0.803 ms 11160200.ms:36.811 37.327 38.865 0.803 11160200.loss:0 11160230.ping:Mon Nov 16 02:30:17 PST 2009 11160230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=101 ms 11160230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11160230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11160230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11160230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=89.6 ms 11160230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.745/62.260/101.693/27.535 ms 11160230.ms:39.745 62.260 101.693 27.535 11160230.loss:0 11160300.ping:Mon Nov 16 03:00:16 PST 2009 11160300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=88.8 ms 11160300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=107 ms 11160300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=97.3 ms 11160300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=117 ms 11160300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=117 ms 11160300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 88.810/105.612/117.334/11.207 ms 11160300.ms:88.810 105.612 117.334 11.207 11160300.loss:0 11160330.ping:Mon Nov 16 03:30:16 PST 2009 11160330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=119 ms 11160330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=177 ms 11160330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11160330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 11160330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=87.7 ms 11160330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11160330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.043/90.125/177.850/55.026 ms 11160330.ms:28.043 90.125 177.850 55.026 11160330.loss:0 11160400.ping:Mon Nov 16 04:00:16 PST 2009 11160400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11160400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 11160400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11160400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11160400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11160400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.029/38.050/39.867/1.266 ms 11160400.ms:37.029 38.050 39.867 1.266 11160400.loss:0 11160430.ping:Mon Nov 16 04:30:17 PST 2009 11160430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=24.5 ms 11160430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=64.2 ms 11160430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11160430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11160430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11160430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11160430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.522/38.151/64.233/13.548 ms 11160430.ms:24.522 38.151 64.233 13.548 11160430.loss:0 11160500.ping:Mon Nov 16 05:00:16 PST 2009 11160500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 11160500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11160500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=29.1 ms 11160500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11160500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11160500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11160500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.152/37.469/40.754/4.211 ms 11160500.ms:29.152 37.469 40.754 4.211 11160500.loss:0 11160530.ping:Mon Nov 16 05:30:16 PST 2009 11160530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11160530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11160530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 11160530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 11160530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=81.8 ms 11160530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11160530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.242/47.371/81.892/17.593 ms 11160530.ms:32.242 47.371 81.892 17.593 11160530.loss:0 11160600.ping:Mon Nov 16 06:00:17 PST 2009 11160600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 11160600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=119 ms 11160600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11160600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11160600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11160600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11160600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.198/57.433/119.616/31.351 ms 11160600.ms:39.198 57.433 119.616 31.351 11160600.loss:0 11160630.ping:Mon Nov 16 06:30:17 PST 2009 11160630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 11160630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=23.3 ms 11160630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=110 ms 11160630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=70.0 ms 11160630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=90.0 ms 11160630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.344/65.209/110.220/33.135 ms 11160630.ms:23.344 65.209 110.220 33.135 11160630.loss:0 11160700.ping:Mon Nov 16 07:00:16 PST 2009 11160700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11160700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=125 ms 11160700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11160700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11160700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11160700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.165/53.720/125.721/36.009 ms 11160700.ms:35.165 53.720 125.721 36.009 11160700.loss:0 11160730.ping:Mon Nov 16 07:30:17 PST 2009 11160730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=56.5 ms 11160730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 11160730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11160730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=54.7 ms 11160730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=24.6 ms 11160730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.613/41.123/56.596/12.467 ms 11160730.ms:24.613 41.123 56.596 12.467 11160730.loss:0 11160800.ping:Mon Nov 16 08:00:17 PST 2009 11160800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11160800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 11160800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11160800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 11160800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=175 ms 11160800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.497/63.941/175.547/55.807 ms 11160800.ms:35.497 63.941 175.547 55.807 11160800.loss:0 11160830.ping:Mon Nov 16 08:30:16 PST 2009 11160830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.6 ms 11160830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11160830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 11160830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.9 ms 11160830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 11160830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11160830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.959/34.187/42.658/5.622 ms 11160830.ms:24.959 34.187 42.658 5.622 11160830.loss:0 11160900.ping:Mon Nov 16 09:00:17 PST 2009 11160900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=44.0 ms 11160900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 11160900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=55.8 ms 11160900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11160900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=72.2 ms 11160900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.972/51.849/72.201/11.253 ms 11160900.ms:41.972 51.849 72.201 11.253 11160900.loss:0 11160930.ping:Mon Nov 16 09:30:16 PST 2009 11160930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11160930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=69.5 ms 11160930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=67.5 ms 11160930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11160930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11160930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=77.2 ms 11160930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11160930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11160930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.402/57.838/77.241/16.987 ms 11160930.ms:37.402 57.838 77.241 16.987 11160930.loss:0 11161000.ping:Mon Nov 16 10:00:16 PST 2009 11161000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11161000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=68.4 ms 11161000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 11161000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11161000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 11161000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=26.2 ms 11161000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11161000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11161000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.246/40.803/68.407/14.357 ms 11161000.ms:26.246 40.803 68.407 14.357 11161000.loss:0 11161030.ping:Mon Nov 16 10:30:16 PST 2009 11161030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11161030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=179 ms 11161030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=60.6 ms 11161030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=151 ms 11161030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=242 ms 11161030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=252 ms 11161030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11161030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11161030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 60.699/177.253/252.039/69.420 ms 11161030.ms:60.699 177.253 252.039 69.420 11161030.loss:0 11161100.ping:Mon Nov 16 11:00:16 PST 2009 11161100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11161100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11161100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.5 ms 11161100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11161100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11161100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11161100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11161100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11161100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.213/39.930/47.520/3.878 ms 11161100.ms:37.213 39.930 47.520 3.878 11161100.loss:0 11161130.ping:Mon Nov 16 11:30:16 PST 2009 11161130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11161130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.6 ms 11161130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=73.9 ms 11161130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=184 ms 11161130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=154 ms 11161130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=135 ms 11161130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11161130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11161130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.673/118.292/184.853/52.413 ms 11161130.ms:42.673 118.292 184.853 52.413 11161130.loss:0 11161200.ping:Mon Nov 16 12:00:16 PST 2009 11161200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11161200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11161200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11161200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11161200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11161200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 11161200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11161200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11161200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.140/38.717/40.074/0.713 ms 11161200.ms:38.140 38.717 40.074 0.713 11161200.loss:0 11161230.ping:Mon Nov 16 12:30:16 PST 2009 11161230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11161230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=71.8 ms 11161230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=29.9 ms 11161230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11161230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.7 ms 11161230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11161230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11161230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11161230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.742/42.335/71.886/15.468 ms 11161230.ms:29.742 42.335 71.886 15.468 11161230.loss:0 11162230.ping:Mon Nov 16 22:30:17 PST 2009 11162230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11162230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11162230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11162230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11162230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 11162230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11162230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11162230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 11162230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.074/39.252/39.415/0.287 ms 11162230.ms:39.074 39.252 39.415 0.287 11162230.loss:0 11162330.ping:Mon Nov 16 23:30:17 PST 2009 11162330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11162330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 11162330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 11162330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11162330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 11162330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=91.0 ms 11162330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11162330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11162330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.577/51.374/91.062/19.872 ms 11162330.ms:39.577 51.374 91.062 19.872 11162330.loss:0 11170000.ping:Tue Nov 17 00:00:16 PST 2009 11170000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=78.8 ms 11170000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 11170000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=66.2 ms 11170000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11170000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11170000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11170000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.388/51.647/78.842/17.565 ms 11170000.ms:36.388 51.647 78.842 17.565 11170000.loss:0 11170030.ping:Tue Nov 17 00:30:16 PST 2009 11170030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 11170030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=172 ms 11170030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=93.0 ms 11170030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.4 ms 11170030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 11170030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11170030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.788/80.769/172.546/49.535 ms 11170030.ms:41.788 80.769 172.546 49.535 11170030.loss:0 11170100.ping:Tue Nov 17 01:00:16 PST 2009 11170100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11170100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 11170100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11170100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=54.1 ms 11170100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11170100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11170100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.708/38.363/54.140/7.937 ms 11170100.ms:33.708 38.363 54.140 7.937 11170100.loss:0 11170130.ping:Tue Nov 17 01:30:16 PST 2009 11170130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=25.7 ms 11170130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11170130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11170130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 11170130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11170130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11170130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.771/34.993/38.673/4.671 ms 11170130.ms:25.771 34.993 38.673 4.671 11170130.loss:0 11170200.ping:Tue Nov 17 02:00:17 PST 2009 11170200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 11170200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 11170200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11170200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11170200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 11170200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11170200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.807/34.811/36.586/1.128 ms 11170200.ms:33.807 34.811 36.586 1.128 11170200.loss:0 11170230.ping:Tue Nov 17 02:30:17 PST 2009 11170230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=371 ms 11170230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=247 ms 11170230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=275 ms 11170230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=325 ms 11170230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=265 ms 11170230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4086ms 11170230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 247.511/296.948/371.963/45.512 ms 11170230.ms:247.511 296.948 371.963 45.512 11170230.loss:0 11170300.ping:Tue Nov 17 03:00:16 PST 2009 11170300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11170300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.8 ms 11170300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11170300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11170300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11170300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11170300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.581/40.249/47.858/3.939 ms 11170300.ms:37.581 40.249 47.858 3.939 11170300.loss:0 11170330.ping:Tue Nov 17 03:30:16 PST 2009 11170330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=63.3 ms 11170330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 11170330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11170330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11170330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 11170330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11170330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.512/40.552/63.340/11.396 ms 11170330.ms:34.512 40.552 63.340 11.396 11170330.loss:0 11170400.ping:Tue Nov 17 04:00:16 PST 2009 11170400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=220 ms 11170400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=197 ms 11170400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11170400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11170400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11170400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11170400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.430/106.177/220.127/84.262 ms 11170400.ms:37.430 106.177 220.127 84.262 11170400.loss:0 11170430.ping:Tue Nov 17 04:30:16 PST 2009 11170430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 11170430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11170430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=22.8 ms 11170430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11170430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11170430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11170430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.817/34.256/41.998/6.957 ms 11170430.ms:22.817 34.256 41.998 6.957 11170430.loss:0 11170500.ping:Tue Nov 17 05:00:16 PST 2009 11170500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11170500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11170500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11170500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11170500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11170500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11170500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.292/37.519/37.755/0.266 ms 11170500.ms:37.292 37.519 37.755 0.266 11170500.loss:0 11170530.ping:Tue Nov 17 05:30:16 PST 2009 11170530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=60.7 ms 11170530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11170530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.6 ms 11170530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11170530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=60.3 ms 11170530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11170530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.523/48.958/60.700/9.490 ms 11170530.ms:40.523 48.958 60.700 9.490 11170530.loss:0 11170600.ping:Tue Nov 17 06:00:16 PST 2009 11170600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=158 ms 11170600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=167 ms 11170600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=178 ms 11170600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=167 ms 11170600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=88.1 ms 11170600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11170600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 88.180/152.068/178.338/32.581 ms 11170600.ms:88.180 152.068 178.338 32.581 11170600.loss:0 11170630.ping:Tue Nov 17 06:30:16 PST 2009 11170630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11170630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11170630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11170630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11170630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=60.4 ms 11170630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11170630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.281/44.404/60.468/8.033 ms 11170630.ms:40.281 44.404 60.468 8.033 11170630.loss:0 11170700.ping:Tue Nov 17 07:00:16 PST 2009 11170700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.3 ms 11170700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 11170700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.2 ms 11170700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 11170700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=29.0 ms 11170700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11170700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.051/43.208/49.311/8.069 ms 11170700.ms:29.051 43.208 49.311 8.069 11170700.loss:0 11170730.ping:Tue Nov 17 07:30:16 PST 2009 11170730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=62.4 ms 11170730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 11170730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11170730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 11170730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11170730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11170730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.965/46.226/62.404/8.090 ms 11170730.ms:41.965 46.226 62.404 8.090 11170730.loss:0 11170800.ping:Tue Nov 17 08:00:16 PST 2009 11170800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=67.5 ms 11170800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 11170800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11170800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 11170800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11170800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11170800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.499/44.631/67.544/11.461 ms 11170800.ms:38.499 44.631 67.544 11.461 11170800.loss:0 11170830.ping:Tue Nov 17 08:30:16 PST 2009 11170830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.4 ms 11170830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.1 ms 11170830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 11170830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11170830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11170830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 11170830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.123/36.165/40.251/4.795 ms 11170830.ms:30.123 36.165 40.251 4.795 11170830.loss:0 11170900.ping:Tue Nov 17 09:00:16 PST 2009 11170900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=191 ms 11170900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=219 ms 11170900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=199 ms 11170900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=219 ms 11170900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=179 ms 11170900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11170900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 179.259/201.657/219.433/15.790 ms 11170900.ms:179.259 201.657 219.433 15.790 11170900.loss:0 11170930.ping:Tue Nov 17 09:30:16 PST 2009 11170930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11170930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 11170930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 11170930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=24.2 ms 11170930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.3 ms 11170930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 11170930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11170930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11170930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.295/31.761/42.492/6.850 ms 11170930.ms:24.295 31.761 42.492 6.850 11170930.loss:0 11171000.ping:Tue Nov 17 10:00:16 PST 2009 11171000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=29.2 ms 11171000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 11171000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 11171000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11171000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=26.9 ms 11171000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11171000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.944/35.564/47.204/7.134 ms 11171000.ms:26.944 35.564 47.204 7.134 11171000.loss:0 11171030.ping:Tue Nov 17 10:30:16 PST 2009 11171030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 11171030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 11171030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.9 ms 11171030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 11171030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.6 ms 11171030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11171030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.878/42.991/51.982/7.708 ms 11171030.ms:33.878 42.991 51.982 7.708 11171030.loss:0 11171100.ping:Tue Nov 17 11:00:16 PST 2009 11171100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.2 ms 11171100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11171100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 11171100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=76.9 ms 11171100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 11171100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11171100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.171/46.383/76.922/15.636 ms 11171100.ms:36.171 46.383 76.922 15.636 11171100.loss:0 11171130.ping:Tue Nov 17 11:30:16 PST 2009 11171130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=472 ms 11171130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=556 ms 11171130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=458 ms 11171130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=427 ms 11171130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=415 ms 11171130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4026ms 11171130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 415.972/466.123/556.736/49.633 ms 11171130.ms:415.972 466.123 556.736 49.633 11171130.loss:0 11171200.ping:Tue Nov 17 12:00:16 PST 2009 11171200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11171200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=80.4 ms 11171200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=109 ms 11171200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=59.3 ms 11171200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.3 ms 11171200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11171200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.732/67.248/109.329/25.284 ms 11171200.ms:37.732 67.248 109.329 25.284 11171200.loss:0 11171230.ping:Tue Nov 17 12:30:16 PST 2009 11171230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 11171230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 11171230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11171230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=58.8 ms 11171230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.4 ms 11171230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11171230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.878/43.731/58.807/9.213 ms 11171230.ms:31.878 43.731 58.807 9.213 11171230.loss:0 11171300.ping:Tue Nov 17 13:00:16 PST 2009 11171300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 11171300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11171300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 11171300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 11171300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 11171300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11171300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.576/38.649/45.412/3.602 ms 11171300.ms:35.576 38.649 45.412 3.602 11171300.loss:0 11171330.ping:Tue Nov 17 13:30:14 PST 2009 11171330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 11171330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=103 ms 11171330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 11171330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11171330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=70.5 ms 11171330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11171330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.466/59.560/103.479/24.725 ms 11171330.ms:40.466 59.560 103.479 24.725 11171330.loss:0 11171400.ping:Tue Nov 17 14:00:17 PST 2009 11171400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11171400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=78.3 ms 11171400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11171400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=109 ms 11171400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 11171400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11171400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.667/60.733/109.201/28.687 ms 11171400.ms:37.667 60.733 109.201 28.687 11171400.loss:0 11171430.ping:Tue Nov 17 14:30:16 PST 2009 11171430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 11171430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=62.1 ms 11171430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 11171430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11171430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 11171430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11171430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.013/46.398/62.146/7.895 ms 11171430.ms:42.013 46.398 62.146 7.895 11171430.loss:0 11171500.ping:Tue Nov 17 15:00:17 PST 2009 11171500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 11171500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=27.4 ms 11171500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 11171500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=57.1 ms 11171500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 11171500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11171500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.460/39.751/57.160/9.659 ms 11171500.ms:27.460 39.751 57.160 9.659 11171500.loss:0 11171530.ping:Tue Nov 17 15:30:16 PST 2009 11171530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 11171530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 11171530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11171530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11171530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 11171530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11171530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.828/38.388/40.088/0.869 ms 11171530.ms:37.828 38.388 40.088 0.869 11171530.loss:0 11171600.ping:Tue Nov 17 16:00:16 PST 2009 11171600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=190 ms 11171600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=122 ms 11171600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 11171600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=162 ms 11171600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=155 ms 11171600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11171600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.036/132.804/190.483/54.385 ms 11171600.ms:33.036 132.804 190.483 54.385 11171600.loss:0 11171630.ping:Tue Nov 17 16:30:16 PST 2009 11171630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=238 ms 11171630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=266 ms 11171630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=286 ms 11171630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=267 ms 11171630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=306 ms 11171630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11171630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 238.195/272.932/306.584/22.782 ms 11171630.ms:238.195 272.932 306.584 22.782 11171630.loss:0 11171700.ping:Tue Nov 17 17:00:17 PST 2009 11171700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11171700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=69.3 ms 11171700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=190 ms 11171700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=110 ms 11171700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11171700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11171700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.089/89.827/190.810/56.835 ms 11171700.ms:38.089 89.827 190.810 56.835 11171700.loss:0 11171730.ping:Tue Nov 17 17:30:16 PST 2009 11171730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 11171730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11171730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=182 ms 11171730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=101 ms 11171730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=271 ms 11171730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11171730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.553/126.968/271.146/89.096 ms 11171730.ms:39.553 126.968 271.146 89.096 11171730.loss:0 11171800.ping:Tue Nov 17 18:00:16 PST 2009 11171800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=62.1 ms 11171800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11171800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11171800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 11171800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 11171800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11171800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.217/44.660/62.147/8.744 ms 11171800.ms:40.217 44.660 62.147 8.744 11171800.loss:0 11171830.ping:Tue Nov 17 18:30:16 PST 2009 11171830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.0 ms 11171830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11171830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=59.3 ms 11171830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 11171830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 11171830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 11171830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.025/41.683/59.315/9.389 ms 11171830.ms:31.025 41.683 59.315 9.389 11171830.loss:0 11171900.ping:Tue Nov 17 19:00:17 PST 2009 11171900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 11171900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11171900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 11171900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 11171900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 11171900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11171900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.864/37.314/38.010/0.846 ms 11171900.ms:35.864 37.314 38.010 0.846 11171900.loss:0 11171930.ping:Tue Nov 17 19:30:16 PST 2009 11171930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11171930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=215 ms 11171930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.6 ms 11171930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=76.7 ms 11171930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 11171930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 11171930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11171930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 11171930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.972/82.293/215.091/67.985 ms 11171930.ms:36.972 82.293 215.091 67.985 11171930.loss:0 11172000.ping:Tue Nov 17 20:00:17 PST 2009 11172000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11172000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=96.0 ms 11172000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=63.6 ms 11172000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.0 ms 11172000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 11172000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=53.7 ms 11172000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11172000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11172000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.004/58.293/96.005/21.278 ms 11172000.ms:34.004 58.293 96.005 21.278 11172000.loss:0 11172030.ping:Tue Nov 17 20:30:16 PST 2009 11172030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11172030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 11172030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 11172030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 11172030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 11172030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 11172030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11172030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11172030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.396/33.006/34.674/0.849 ms 11172030.ms:32.396 33.006 34.674 0.849 11172030.loss:0 11172100.ping:Tue Nov 17 21:00:16 PST 2009 11172100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11172100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 11172100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=106 ms 11172100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.5 ms 11172100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 11172100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 11172100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11172100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 11172100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.685/53.055/106.825/27.205 ms 11172100.ms:35.685 53.055 106.825 27.205 11172100.loss:0 11172130.ping:Tue Nov 17 21:30:16 PST 2009 11172130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11172130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 11172130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 11172130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 11172130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11172130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 11172130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11172130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11172130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.175/40.719/42.285/0.809 ms 11172130.ms:40.175 40.719 42.285 0.809 11172130.loss:0 11172200.ping:Tue Nov 17 22:00:17 PST 2009 11172200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11172200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 11172200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 11172200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 11172200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11172200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 11172200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11172200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11172200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.143/35.668/37.430/0.891 ms 11172200.ms:35.143 35.668 37.430 0.891 11172200.loss:0 11172230.ping:Tue Nov 17 22:30:16 PST 2009 11172230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11172230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 11172230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 11172230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 11172230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 11172230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 11172230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 11172230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 11172230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.069/36.593/38.143/0.790 ms 11172230.ms:36.069 36.593 38.143 0.790 11172230.loss:0 11172300.ping:Tue Nov 17 23:00:16 PST 2009 11172300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 11172300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=435 ms 11172300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=464 ms 11